Liverpool FC Forum

supersub » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:00 am wrote:Tranmere set to sign Suarez on a short term loan deal from June 1st. The initial loan for 3 months will expire August 31st. Tranmere's league season starts Saturday 3rd August with a league cup 1st leg game Wednesday 31st July. Luis Suarez will be unable to play in Tranmere's 3 league games and the 2 league cup games before the Premier League season kicks off on the 17th August, due to the ban imposed by the English FA. Suarez will probably return to Liverpool before the league campaign starts and will therefore serve out his 1 game remaining ban on the opening day of the Premiership season.

Benny The Noon » Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:53 pm wrote:

devaney » Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:36 pm wrote:It takes a very special kind of t.osser that spends three days advocating that Suarez should be punished and then complains that the sentence was too severe. The media sh.itstorm guaranteed that an example would be made of Luis. Massive shame that some of our own so-called supporters felt it necessary to stick the boot in as well.

It's called people believing there to be a middle ground

Believing that the act deserved punishment but nowhere near getting 10 games - maximum 5-6 possibly with a few suspended. That way it's a strong punishment without it going too far without justification

So that's why I believe that Suarez did deserve to be punished but that 10 games was way over the top

damjan193 » Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:03 pm wrote:

supersub » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:00 am wrote:Tranmere set to sign Suarez on a short term loan deal from June 1st. The initial loan for 3 months will expire August 31st. Tranmere's league season starts Saturday 3rd August with a league cup 1st leg game Wednesday 31st July. Luis Suarez will be unable to play in Tranmere's 3 league games and the 2 league cup games before the Premier League season kicks off on the 17th August, due to the ban imposed by the English FA. Suarez will probably return to Liverpool before the league campaign starts and will therefore serve out his 1 game remaining ban on the opening day of the Premiership season.

Can we really do this?

LFC1990 » Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:57 pm wrote:Wow what a  crazy place this is. You have liverpool fans thinking the ban was the correct descion and others saying Suarez purposely done it to get a transfer when if anything it would stop him moving to the likes of Bayern or Barcelona.

devaney » Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:05 pm wrote:

Benny The Noon » Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:53 pm wrote:

devaney » Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:36 pm wrote:It takes a very special kind of t.osser that spends three days advocating that Suarez should be punished and then complains that the sentence was too severe. The media sh.itstorm guaranteed that an example would be made of Luis. Massive shame that some of our own so-called supporters felt it necessary to stick the boot in as well.

It's called people believing there to be a middle ground

Believing that the act deserved punishment but nowhere near getting 10 games - maximum 5-6 possibly with a few suspended. That way it's a strong punishment without it going too far without justification

So that's why I believe that Suarez did deserve to be punished but that 10 games was way over the top

And right on time number one t.osser arrives !!! What the fk did you expect? You have personally commented more on Suarez's latest indiscretion than anybody else and have strongly advocated time after time that he needed to be punished. Because of Cameron, the media, opposing fans and the likes of fkg clowns like you he has ended up with a ten game ban.

devaney » Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:05 pm wrote:

Benny The Noon » Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:53 pm wrote:

devaney » Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:36 pm wrote:It takes a very special kind of t.osser that spends three days advocating that Suarez should be punished and then complains that the sentence was too severe. The media sh.itstorm guaranteed that an example would be made of Luis. Massive shame that some of our own so-called supporters felt it necessary to stick the boot in as well.

It's called people believing there to be a middle ground

Believing that the act deserved punishment but nowhere near getting 10 games - maximum 5-6 possibly with a few suspended. That way it's a strong punishment without it going too far without justification

So that's why I believe that Suarez did deserve to be punished but that 10 games was way over the top

And right on time number one t.osser arrives !!! What the fk did you expect? You have personally commented more on Suarez's latest indiscretion than anybody else and have strongly advocated time after time that he needed to be punished. Because of Cameron, the media, opposing fans and the likes of fkg clowns like you he has ended up with a ten game ban.

LFC1990 » Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:57 pm wrote:Wow what a  crazy place this is. You have liverpool fans thinking the ban was the correct descion and others saying Suarez purposely done it to get a transfer when if anything it would stop him moving to the likes of Bayern or Barcelona.

I mentioned this in the past. We have relied on Luis Suarez in the last two seasons very heavily. The man is a fantastic player and the most skillful we have ever had here.

Its about time the fans and Team showed Luis some support. If this biting hadnt happend and luid turned round at the end of the season saying he wanted to Leave people would ask him to show some loyalty. How about we show some loyalty towards Luis and stand by him in his time of need.

Also to the people who want to sell him say we get 50 million for him. There isnt a single person who would be interested in coming here that would even be half as good as Luis.

Its good to see some support from Pepe and Rodgers for Luis or more rage at the length of the ban

devaney » Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:16 pm wrote:BTG - I don't have to go back too far to find you telling somebody to fk off and calling somebody else a clown. If that is your idea of civility then 22 years in the military clearly taught you fk all.......

Benny The Noon » Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:53 pm wrote:

devaney » Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:36 pm wrote:It takes a very special kind of t.osser that spends three days advocating that Suarez should be punished and then complains that the sentence was too severe. The media sh.itstorm guaranteed that an example would be made of Luis. Massive shame that some of our own so-called supporters felt it necessary to stick the boot in as well.

It's called people believing there to be a middle ground

Believing that the act deserved punishment but nowhere near getting 10 games - maximum 5-6 possibly with a few suspended. That way it's a strong punishment without it going too far without justification

So that's why I believe that Suarez did deserve to be punished but that 10 games was way over the top

damjan193 » Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:24 pm wrote:

Benny The Noon » Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:53 pm wrote:

devaney » Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:36 pm wrote:It takes a very special kind of t.osser that spends three days advocating that Suarez should be punished and then complains that the sentence was too severe. The media sh.itstorm guaranteed that an example would be made of Luis. Massive shame that some of our own so-called supporters felt it necessary to stick the boot in as well.

It's called people believing there to be a middle ground

Believing that the act deserved punishment but nowhere near getting 10 games - maximum 5-6 possibly with a few suspended. That way it's a strong punishment without it going too far without justification

So that's why I believe that Suarez did deserve to be punished but that 10 games was way over the top

I don't think anyone disagrees that Suarez should be punished, the length of the suspension is the problem. I also agreed that Suarez should be banned for 5-6 games (4 being the most reasonable), but you seem like you have a personal hatred towards Suarez.

supersub » Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:45 am wrote:I don't think Benny will be happy until Suarez is driven from the club with "only me" and heimdall waving gleefully behind him......

ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:38 am wrote:

Benny The Noon » Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:46 am wrote:

supersub » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:43 am wrote:I would have suggested the customary 3 game ban , defoe default case, and then a hearty welcome back given to him by a capacity crowd at Anfield for the final game against QPR....give the lad your support

Suarez gets our support - shame he keeps putting on the line with his actions

3 games was never going to given when for his last incident of this nature he was given 7 games.

thats got nothing to do with it, the F.A cant take what happened in holland into consideration.
what i want to know is why did defoe only get a yellow card for something that warrants a 10 match ban?
all that stuff about defoe couldnt be done because the ref saw the incident and dealt with it on the pitch is rubbish, the ref saw thatchers forearm smash on mendez and booked him but after the game the F.A over ruled the ref and gave thatcher a 8 match ban.
now if biting is seen as worthy as a 10 game ban (2 more than thatchers forearm smash) why didnt the F.A over rule the ref in the defoe`s/mascherano incident?