Liverpool FC Forum

by **dawson99** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 9:58 pm

bavlondon wrote:
dawson99 wrote:the stat is fact, nothing harder factwise than stats. And no one wanted the old manager to stick around.

last 6 games record is all we can go by really, we need to win more, but we're winning more than the first 10 games or whatever... and the last 6 games stat, whats wrong with it? Just because it takes away another reason for you to have a go?

Sorry but why exacltly do we only go by the last 6 games? Is that because the last few games contain 1 or 2 games where we haven't been gash? If you want to look at facts then look here.

The fact is we replaced a manager with a win % of over 55% with someone whos record is around 30%. You can twist and skew stats all you want mate but it doesn't sweep any of this under the carpet. This stink is too big to cover up.

we got rid of a manager whod lost the plot... its that simple, and we're watching hik lose the plot at inter as well. It dont matetr if he knows the people if hes sh!t at his job

Now we got Roy, who needs a bedding in, now in his last 6 he is starting to work it out...

i use the last 6 as thats what the papers and everyon else in the world uses, last 6.. check the coupons, thats what they use too.

by **tubby** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:03 pm

So now you are going from using facts to an opinion? What's this last 6 business? :laugh:

I prefer to judge him on everything he has done so far, the bigger picture see.

by **dawson99** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:04 pm

bavlondon wrote:So now you are going from using facts to an opinion? What's this last 6 business? I prefer to judge him on everything he has done so far, the bigger picture see.

how can you get abig picture if after 3 games you lot wanted him gone? :wwww

keep trying, getting betetr though.

He has to be given til at least Christmas, and even thats a pretty small damn picture

by **tubby** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:15 pm

Who said 3 games? I said everything we have seen so far ie since he got here and i've not been impressed. Look mate the fact is if he was getting results or we were showing some positive signs then there wouldn't be so many people on his back. Forget about the results even, there is no passion in the players no nothing. Ok we looked good against Chelsea for 20 mins but 20 mins in a quater of a season just isn't enough.

Also the way he talks to the press is a joke too. Im starting to think the guy is pretty arrogant. He comes across as a nice enough guy but at times when backed in a corner his responses have been of the tone that he is demanding respect. You would never see any self respecting manager actually come and say they are one of the most respected managers in Europe or trying to justify their tactics with a list of the clubs they have been at. We don't need him to remind us of where he has been, although maybe he has a point re the scandi clubs.

At least Comoilli sees the funny side of it though.

He probably will be given until xmas, unless we implode and lose 4 or 5 on the trot.

by **Thommo's perm** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:19 pm

Benny The Noon wrote:
dawson99 wrote:the stat is fact, nothing harder factwise than stats. And no one wanted the old manager to stick around.

last 6 games record is all we can go by really, we need to win more, but we're winning more than the first 10 games or whatever... and the last 6 games stat, whats wrong with it? Just because it takes away another reason for you to have a go?

Im pretty sure plenty wanted the previous manager to stay . So no thommo we want all agree his time was up . You have your opinion I have mine neither is the same opinion as everyone . Simple as that

This is what I mean
"Simple as that" One of your favourite sayings, as if youve sussed the truth and its final, no question.

I disagree (as you might have guessed). As I see it Benitezes time was up as a matter of course. Same as any other manager who was bereft of ideas after years of trying and failing to win anything. I know Roy looks that way at he moment but the owner has publicly stated that we shouldnt blame him for our current plight. It matters not a jot to me if thousands hate Roy and thousands love Benitez. It doesnt sway me either way because I make my own mind up.
You keep repeating, ad nauseum, how cr'ap we are playing this season with the exceptions of a few games, most notably arsenal, skanks and chelsea. I agree we are playing badly, but really, what did you expect?

by **SumScouser** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:39 pm

The sooner he's gone the better,the man is way out of his depth

by **tubby** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:42 pm

SumScouser wrote:The sooner he's gone the better,the man is way out of his depth

Welcome to the forum mate.

by **Dundalk** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:42 pm

Youve been waiting since June to say that

by **Redman in wales** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:45 pm

gerrard injured

dont know how serious. walking off though

by **Thommo's perm** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:45 pm

SumScouser wrote:The sooner he's gone the better,the man is way out of his depth

Thats a great phrase
Could you explain what it means please?

by **tubby** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:47 pm

Redman in wales wrote:gerrard injured dont know how serious. walking off though

Did Capello really need to play him for 80+ mins? England are :censored:

anyway.

by **NANNY RED** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:48 pm

SumScouser wrote:The sooner he's gone the better,the man is way out of his depth

Its so hard for some to understand that though lad ,

by **Thommo's perm** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:49 pm

bavlondon wrote:
Redman in wales wrote:gerrard injured dont know how serious. walking off though

Did Capello really need to play him for 80+ mins? England are anyway.

Yes he did because theyre even worse without him
Fu*king england again!

:angry:

by **NANNY RED** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:49 pm

Hodgson for ENGERLUND , GET A CAMPAIN GOIN :nod

by **Thommo's perm** » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:51 pm

Yeah and get Capello up here

Liverpool FC Forum

ROY HODGSON - Official Thread

Who is online