Liverpool FC Forum

andy_g wrote:

Emerald Red wrote:

andy_g wrote:

Emerald Red wrote:Then b*tch about squad depth after he does it, and beforehand he b*tched about us being overstaffed.

jesus christ. how many more people are going to stubbornly refuse to see that there is no contradiction in saying that LFC is overstaffed but that the first team squad is also light? i know there is a tendency for the hard core hodgson haters to dissect and criticise his every utterance but this one just takes the biscuit.

Why does it take the biscuit when it's 100% truth?

show me the original quote where his 'overstaffed' comment is explicitly referring to the fact we have too many first team players and i'll take it all back. i'll send you some chocolates as well.

bigmick wrote:It is incredible to me that every day otherwise sensible people simply cannot see how ridiculous they are being about the whole Hodgson thing It's one thing to not believe he is the right man for the job, even that he ought to be replaced immediately, but it is entirely another to conduct the witch hunt and silliness you get on here. People aren't losing the plot, they have already completely lost it. When you consider we are level on points with the spot in which we finished last season, it becomes all the more bizarre.

Pictures of i-pads and the like, then completely getting the wrong end of the stick about what the symbols mean before slagging Roy off because you can't understand what you're looking at The World truly has gone mad.

bigmick wrote:It is incredible to me that every day otherwise sensible people simply cannot see how ridiculous they are being about the whole Hodgson thing It's one thing to not believe he is the right man for the job, even that he ought to be replaced immediately, but it is entirely another to conduct the witch hunt and silliness you get on here. People aren't losing the plot, they have already completely lost it. When you consider we are level on points with the spot in which we finished last season, it becomes all the more bizarre.

Pictures of i-pads and the like, then completely getting the wrong end of the stick about what the symbols mean before slagging Roy off because you can't understand what you're looking at The World truly has gone mad.

rocky29 wrote:

bigmick wrote:It is incredible to me that every day otherwise sensible people simply cannot see how ridiculous they are being about the whole Hodgson thing It's one thing to not believe he is the right man for the job, even that he ought to be replaced immediately, but it is entirely another to conduct the witch hunt and silliness you get on here. People aren't losing the plot, they have already completely lost it. When you consider we are level on points with the spot in which we finished last season, it becomes all the more bizarre.

Pictures of i-pads and the like, then completely getting the wrong end of the stick about what the symbols mean before slagging Roy off because you can't understand what you're looking at The World truly has gone mad.

leave it mick you wont this argument. Seems that some members have special treatment where as you and i are just seen as troublemakers just because we dont agree with there views.

supersub wrote:

rocky29 wrote:

bigmick wrote:It is incredible to me that every day otherwise sensible people simply cannot see how ridiculous they are being about the whole Hodgson thing It's one thing to not believe he is the right man for the job, even that he ought to be replaced immediately, but it is entirely another to conduct the witch hunt and silliness you get on here. People aren't losing the plot, they have already completely lost it. When you consider we are level on points with the spot in which we finished last season, it becomes all the more bizarre.

Pictures of i-pads and the like, then completely getting the wrong end of the stick about what the symbols mean before slagging Roy off because you can't understand what you're looking at The World truly has gone mad.

leave it mick you wont this argument. Seems that some members have special treatment where as you and i are just seen as troublemakers just because we dont agree with there views.

No mick has some valid points that should be addressed by others that feel he may have mis-interpreted what they have said , whereas you on the other hand are clearly on this forum to act as a WUM....

andy_g wrote:i'll leap to your defense, rocky mate. there's no way you're a wum - you're not smart enough.

Benny The Noon wrote:

andy_g wrote:i'll leap to your defense, rocky mate. there's no way you're a wum - you're not smart enough.

parchpea wrote:With chants of attack attack ringing out every game lately I think we are just fed up with safe football which started under Houllier and was continued by Benitez and now through to Hodgson. I understand we had success under the former managers reigns but its never been pretty for a long time and personally Im fed up with it now. Maybe its the just the way the modern game has gone seeing as most top managers and sides employ this cagey game but not since Roy Evans employed wings backs and the days of McManaman, Fowler and Collymore have I genuinely been excited by attacking football at Liverpool. Its been a long stretch of defensive coaches for us and it will Hodgsons undoing no question about it.

Benny The Noon wrote:

parchpea wrote:With chants of attack attack ringing out every game lately I think we are just fed up with safe football which started under Houllier and was continued by Benitez and now through to Hodgson. I understand we had success under the former managers reigns but its never been pretty for a long time and personally Im fed up with it now. Maybe its the just the way the modern game has gone seeing as most top managers and sides employ this cagey game but not since Roy Evans employed wings backs and the days of McManaman, Fowler and Collymore have I genuinely been excited by attacking football at Liverpool. Its been a long stretch of defensive coaches for us and it will Hodgsons undoing no question about it.

If we were challenging and getting results I don't think too many would complain about the style but when we are struggling and looking to turn a corner to move up the table and we need to grab wins against teams at the bottom then people will be annoyed if we are defensive .

Benny The Noon wrote:

andy_g wrote:i'll leap to your defense, rocky mate. there's no way you're a wum - you're not smart enough.