Roy's Liverpool - How's it Evolving? - Set Up, Tactics, In-Depth Footy Chat

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby Emerald Red » Sat Aug 28, 2010 3:11 am

Octsky wrote:so far Roy has been correcting Rafa's mistakes, n very much work-in-progress.

Sami Hypia: rafa (sold off), Roy (try to sign back, club wont release)

Peter Crouch: rafa (sold off), Roy (try to sign back, scored hat trick to put spurs into Champs league)

Bellamy: rafa, sold. few BPL club wants to sign him but deem too dangerous for ManC, loan to div 1

Aurellio:Rafa, sold. Roy, Resign

Alonso: rafa, sold, player lost faith in manager, signs Aquaman as replacement.

Aquaman: Rafa, Signed, injured for 3 months, didnt play much, fitness still a doubt. Roy, loan to Juve to save wage n protect value.

Arbeloa: Rafa, sold. player spend majority season on RM's bench. spend 18m to sign Johnson.
as a result we have no back up striker for Torres. Roy, looking for backup striker bf transfer window close in a few wks time.

Reira n Beneyou: useful wingers, fed up with Rafa, sold. Roy, signs Joe Cole.

Lucas: featured too much under Rafa. Roy, sign Poulsen to increase competition.

Highly rated youngsters: not used by rafa. Roy, trying to blend them slowly into 1st team.

i just hope that Roy wont commit too many mistakes for the next manager (if) to correct them again.

Some of the biggest, most lopsided bollox I've ever read on this forum, and that is a statement right there in itself. Absolutely unreal how a person can spew so much sh*te in a single post.
Image
User avatar
Emerald Red
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7289
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:22 pm
Location: Ireland

Postby maguskwt » Sat Aug 28, 2010 3:25 am

Emerald Red wrote:
Octsky wrote:so far Roy has been correcting Rafa's mistakes, n very much work-in-progress.

Sami Hypia: rafa (sold off), Roy (try to sign back, club wont release)

Peter Crouch: rafa (sold off), Roy (try to sign back, scored hat trick to put spurs into Champs league)

Bellamy: rafa, sold. few BPL club wants to sign him but deem too dangerous for ManC, loan to div 1

Aurellio:Rafa, sold. Roy, Resign

Alonso: rafa, sold, player lost faith in manager, signs Aquaman as replacement.

Aquaman: Rafa, Signed, injured for 3 months, didnt play much, fitness still a doubt. Roy, loan to Juve to save wage n protect value.

Arbeloa: Rafa, sold. player spend majority season on RM's bench. spend 18m to sign Johnson.
as a result we have no back up striker for Torres. Roy, looking for backup striker bf transfer window close in a few wks time.

Reira n Beneyou: useful wingers, fed up with Rafa, sold. Roy, signs Joe Cole.

Lucas: featured too much under Rafa. Roy, sign Poulsen to increase competition.

Highly rated youngsters: not used by rafa. Roy, trying to blend them slowly into 1st team.

i just hope that Roy wont commit too many mistakes for the next manager (if) to correct them again.

Some of the biggest, most lopsided bollox I've ever read on this forum, and that is a statement right there in itself. Absolutely unreal how a person can spew so much sh*te in a single post.

:laugh:
Image
maguskwt
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8232
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:39 pm

Postby Emerald Red » Sat Aug 28, 2010 3:31 am

Bermenstein wrote:Well if Roy likes his 4-4-2, I'd like to see Kuyt given a run with Torres up front, with J Cole operating from the Right coming in or playing wide.

Image

The only thing that would stop us being successful using a 442, is that our Full backs are not defensively sound enough to carry it out really effectively. And certainly J Cole and Babel can not compensate for the weakness in our full back positions.

So thats the downside to 442.

I think you're wrong IMO in saying that there is only one downside to stop a 4-4-2 working with the players we have, and it's got nothing to do with the center backs at all. With the way you have that midfield set up, it highlights the massive problem we have just in front of the back four with Lucas or Poulsen, neither of which are likely to carry the ball into the middle and spray it around with great effect or confidence to supply our wide men, of which I've kept pointing out are neither natural wingers, nor great crossers or really skilled on the ball with the obvious exception of Joe Cole, who does all his best work centrally anyway.

I'd drop Cole into where Gerrard is playing there just in behind Torres, and have Kuyt back over on the right, with Gerrard and Lucas playing just off each other flat across the middle. Our midfield wouldn't get overrun like it did against City that way and we'd be more solid and compact overall.

Edit - sorry, I thought you said centre-backs instead of full-backs, of which I then agree, hence my point on Lucas/Poulsen being a concern. Johnson is known to be a bit of a liabillity charging down the pitch, which sometimes leaves Carragher exposed and Lucas finds himself being dragged to that side to cover. When this happens, our midfield just opens up like the red sea if Gerrard is in an advanced position.
Last edited by Emerald Red on Sat Aug 28, 2010 3:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Emerald Red
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7289
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:22 pm
Location: Ireland

Postby Octsky » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:00 am

Emerald Red wrote:
Octsky wrote:so far Roy has been correcting Rafa's mistakes, n very much work-in-progress.

Sami Hypia: rafa (sold off), Roy (try to sign back, club wont release)

Peter Crouch: rafa (sold off), Roy (try to sign back, scored hat trick to put spurs into Champs league)

Bellamy: rafa, sold. few BPL club wants to sign him but deem too dangerous for ManC, loan to div 1

Aurellio:Rafa, sold. Roy, Resign

Alonso: rafa, sold, player lost faith in manager, signs Aquaman as replacement.

Aquaman: Rafa, Signed, injured for 3 months, didnt play much, fitness still a doubt. Roy, loan to Juve to save wage n protect value.

Arbeloa: Rafa, sold. player spend majority season on RM's bench. spend 18m to sign Johnson.
as a result we have no back up striker for Torres. Roy, looking for backup striker bf transfer window close in a few wks time.

Reira n Beneyou: useful wingers, fed up with Rafa, sold. Roy, signs Joe Cole.

Lucas: featured too much under Rafa. Roy, sign Poulsen to increase competition.

Highly rated youngsters: not used by rafa. Roy, trying to blend them slowly into 1st team.

i just hope that Roy wont commit too many mistakes for the next manager (if) to correct them again.

Some of the biggest, most lopsided bollox I've ever read on this forum, and that is a statement right there in itself. Absolutely unreal how a person can spew so much sh*te in a single post.

we did resign Aurellio, tried to resign Hypia, strong linked with Crouch, Bellamy (to some extend).

Reira and Benny, Alonso left becoz they couldn't spend another min with Rafa. Joe cole came in.

Dani Pacheno threatens to leave, and get the number 15 instead of #42 from Roy and starts to feature for the first team.

the season we sign Johnson is the season Torres got injured for half of the season n we arent covered.

saw from the board we signed Raúl meireles. so if RM is signed to replace masch, the Poulsen is signed for what??
to replace Lucas.

ya loads of rubbish. Rafa shouldnt have left, n now he is talking of changing Inter, present euro champs n treble winners for the better after they lost in the Super cup.
User avatar
Octsky
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 1716
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 5:23 pm
Location: mauritius

Postby fivecups » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:37 am

Scottbot wrote:
stmichael wrote:
Scottbot wrote:Just for those who point blank claim 4-4-2 does not work in the Premiership or in big games I think it's worth pointing out that Spurs played it yesterday and dished out a 4-0 hammering and they also employed in the opener AGAINST CITY and absolutely spanked em in that first half despite somehow failing to score. The personnel and tempo of your passing is JUST as important as the formation selected.

if spurs play 4-4-2 against anyone decent in the CL they'll get spanked.

playing 4-4-2 against city the other day was a mistake but the extent to which gray used it as a stick to beat rafa with was tiresome and laughable. before the game hodgson was apparently "brave" for playing 4-4-2 and we had to listen to gray waffling on about how benitez wouldn't have played two upfront and then had to endure another five minutes of how gerrard should be playing centre mid blah blah blah.

we end up getting spanked 3-0 and yet because it's roy and he's english we'll let him off. if that had been rafa in charge of us he'd have got pulled to shreds. and don't even get me started on spurs. redknapp isn't a tactician in the slightest. they get results by having a high tempo passing game. even if spurs get a tonking in the cl the pundits over here still won't question harry's tactics one bit. it'll be oh spurs are naive at this level and other such nonsense. his tactics were shocking in the first half of the first leg against young boys and yet when they asked tony cottee in the studio if redknapp got his tactics wrong we got a "no i don't think so". once again had it been us under rafa he'd have got slaughtered.

rant over. why am i so angry on my birthday? :angry:  :D

Belated Happy Birthday dude! I agree oon Andy Gray, he didn't half go on about playing the 4-4-2 away and so forth and it got a bit tedious. Must admit I was a little bit surprised to see us set up that way and my first thought was that's brave but it could be a big mistake (which it proved to be). But then watching the first 10 minutes and seeing as City weren't even playing with a proper number 9 I started to think we might just have stolen the initiative here but the personel was all wrong, we sat too deep and our passing was slow and lethargic. However, I still stand by what I say about Spurs, i've been immensely impressed with what i've seen so far this season. They may well get a hammering playing 4-4-2 in Europe but I think they'll surprise a few people. WAtch them play and notice how big they make the pitch, how quickly they move the ball, the play of their wide players, and how effectively they use Crouch/Defoe in the forward positions. It's classic 4-4-2 play. The formation is not dead and buried, not if you play it correctly. I hope (and believe) the best way for us to play is with Torres up front on his own but if Hodgson wants to play some 4-4-2 it may take him some time to get it right because he plainly got it wrong the other night.

Speaking as someone who has virtually discounted 4-4-2 from the modern game they are excellent points Scott. I'll keep a closer eye on them to see how that goes - I did watch them play City and there was no question, they were the better team by far. I wonder if that influenced Roy's decision to play 4-4-2 last week?

Clearly 4-4-2 can and does work at times, for me though, it get's beaten by a 4-5-1 setup more often than not. I remember United beating us at Anfield a few years ago by controlling the midfield with 5 men against 4 - Scholes had a field day.

I was also wondering how much our tactical analysis differs from that of a top level manager. Let's face it, there are millions of managers in the world but very few manage at the top level - the ones we discuss are the best in the world. How much more in-depth is their thinking than ours? For instance in chess, a bog standard player thinks 2 or 3 moves ahead but a grandmaster will be thinking 8 or 9 moves ahead - something that is exponentially more difficult to do. They are on another level. Is it the same in football management?
User avatar
fivecups
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 4264
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 12:32 am
Location: Belfast

Postby Owzat » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:48 am

Octsky

FWIW I certainly don't believe trying to/actually resigning Aurelio, Crouch, Bellamy and Hyypia would be/were wise moves anyway. Aurelio was injury prone, Hyypia gave us good service but sometimes it is better to say thanks and everyone move on. Crouch was never that good, just because he scored a hat-trick against a mickey mouse side doesn't make him all better now. Bellamy never really cut it with us, and that golfing incident should not be forgotten any more than the Itandje disgrace, the club doesn't need that kind of press.

Riera looked good but didn't deliver, then fell out so we don't need his type here.

Aquilani never proved himself one way or the other, mainly because he wasn't given enough chance, but frankly how do you fit him into the side?!?! He's what many might consider a luxury player


Can't really argue re Arbeloa, although Arbeloa made some defensive mistakes himself so was far from perfect

Once Rafa tried to sell Alonso and buy Barry, Alonso's departure was inevitable and perhaps so was Rafa's. Sad that a supposed top manager can't see the value of one of his key players and so highly rated Barry who is at best just outside the top echelon but truly is a completely different player and a poor man's Gerrard.

Lucas played so much because he fitted the system Rafa wanted to play more than Aquilani could/would, granted that makes the signing of Aquilani even more ridiculous, but hey ho

But try and ignore ER's twa'tish remark, most people who come out with such responses and zilch to back it up don't have the capacity to. Should be a straight red card offence as it doesn't even offer an attempt to back up what is doubtless a breach of forum rules but mods don't seem to bother with. Must be something about the place he comes from, he's not the only one
Never buy from PC World, product quality is poor and their 'customer service' is even poorer
User avatar
Owzat
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7487
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 8:55 am
Location: England

Postby fivecups » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:09 am

Good points Owzat - apart from the Belfast racism :p ! I'd add a few things to it.

Aquilani, apparently wasn't just physically injured but had psychologically issues as well. Supposedly he wasn't training well and made multiple excuses to get out of playing games, very strange, but again not someone we need at the club.

Arbeloa only had a year left on his contract. He wanted to play for Real. We could either accept £2.5 million or force him to stay and risk him disrupting the dressing room, leaving on a free a year later.

The Alonso/ Barry thing was clearly a huge balls up as we ended up with neither. I think Barrys an excellent player, we'll see that this season but Alonso was pure magic. In Rafa's defense on this one, Alonso had his two worst seasons at the club until 08/9 and Rafa wanted Barry above Keane, but we'll not reopen that can of worms. I wasn't in favour of trying to sell Alonso at any time.
User avatar
fivecups
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 4264
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 12:32 am
Location: Belfast

Postby Thommo's perm » Sat Aug 28, 2010 8:10 am

fivecups wrote:Good points Owzat - apart from the Belfast racism :p ! I'd add a few things to it.

Aquilani, apparently wasn't just physically injured but had psychologically issues as well. Supposedly he wasn't training well and made multiple excuses to get out of playing games, very strange, but again not someone we need at the club.

Arbeloa only had a year left on his contract. He wanted to play for Real. We could either accept £2.5 million or force him to stay and risk him disrupting the dressing room, leaving on a free a year later.

The Alonso/ Barry thing was clearly a huge balls up as we ended up with neither. I think Barrys an excellent player, we'll see that this season but Alonso was pure magic. In Rafa's defense on this one, Alonso had his two worst seasons at the club until 08/9 and Rafa wanted Barry above Keane, but we'll not reopen that can of worms. I wasn't in favour of trying to sell Alonso at any time.

"Aquilani, apparently wasn't just physically injured but had psychologically issues as well. Supposedly he wasn't training well and made multiple excuses to get out of playing games"

Where did you get this information from...?
???
User avatar
Thommo's perm
 
Posts: 6383
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:57 am
Location: liverpool

Postby The Raven » Sat Aug 28, 2010 8:20 am

Thommo's perm wrote:
fivecups wrote:Good points Owzat - apart from the Belfast racism :p ! I'd add a few things to it.

Aquilani, apparently wasn't just physically injured but had psychologically issues as well. Supposedly he wasn't training well and made multiple excuses to get out of playing games, very strange, but again not someone we need at the club.

Arbeloa only had a year left on his contract. He wanted to play for Real. We could either accept £2.5 million or force him to stay and risk him disrupting the dressing room, leaving on a free a year later.

The Alonso/ Barry thing was clearly a huge balls up as we ended up with neither. I think Barrys an excellent player, we'll see that this season but Alonso was pure magic. In Rafa's defense on this one, Alonso had his two worst seasons at the club until 08/9 and Rafa wanted Barry above Keane, but we'll not reopen that can of worms. I wasn't in favour of trying to sell Alonso at any time.

"Aquilani, apparently wasn't just physically injured but had psychologically issues as well. Supposedly he wasn't training well and made multiple excuses to get out of playing games"

Where did you get this information from...?
???

Rafa, he more or less said last season that hes not injured but thought he was.
The Raven
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:09 am
Location: Kent

Postby fivecups » Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:06 am

Thommo's perm wrote:
fivecups wrote:Good points Owzat - apart from the Belfast racism :p ! I'd add a few things to it.

Aquilani, apparently wasn't just physically injured but had psychologically issues as well. Supposedly he wasn't training well and made multiple excuses to get out of playing games, very strange, but again not someone we need at the club.

Arbeloa only had a year left on his contract. He wanted to play for Real. We could either accept £2.5 million or force him to stay and risk him disrupting the dressing room, leaving on a free a year later.

The Alonso/ Barry thing was clearly a huge balls up as we ended up with neither. I think Barrys an excellent player, we'll see that this season but Alonso was pure magic. In Rafa's defense on this one, Alonso had his two worst seasons at the club until 08/9 and Rafa wanted Barry above Keane, but we'll not reopen that can of worms. I wasn't in favour of trying to sell Alonso at any time.

"Aquilani, apparently wasn't just physically injured but had psychologically issues as well. Supposedly he wasn't training well and made multiple excuses to get out of playing games"

Where did you get this information from...?
???

Rafa talked about some of his problems being in his head at one point. There was some discussion on RAWK about him not trying in training and not being that keen to play.

Not robust evidence, I know, but there you go - it would be nice to have more details on the whole thing.
User avatar
fivecups
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 4264
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 12:32 am
Location: Belfast

Postby Thommo's perm » Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:56 am

The Raven wrote:
Thommo's perm wrote:
fivecups wrote:Good points Owzat - apart from the Belfast racism :p ! I'd add a few things to it.

Aquilani, apparently wasn't just physically injured but had psychologically issues as well. Supposedly he wasn't training well and made multiple excuses to get out of playing games, very strange, but again not someone we need at the club.

Arbeloa only had a year left on his contract. He wanted to play for Real. We could either accept £2.5 million or force him to stay and risk him disrupting the dressing room, leaving on a free a year later.

The Alonso/ Barry thing was clearly a huge balls up as we ended up with neither. I think Barrys an excellent player, we'll see that this season but Alonso was pure magic. In Rafa's defense on this one, Alonso had his two worst seasons at the club until 08/9 and Rafa wanted Barry above Keane, but we'll not reopen that can of worms. I wasn't in favour of trying to sell Alonso at any time.

"Aquilani, apparently wasn't just physically injured but had psychologically issues as well. Supposedly he wasn't training well and made multiple excuses to get out of playing games"

Where did you get this information from...?
???

Rafa, he more or less said last season that hes not injured but thought he was.

Oh. I thought it was from a pshyciatrist or someone qualified to give such an assessment.
I remember Rafa saying that
:laugh:
User avatar
Thommo's perm
 
Posts: 6383
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:57 am
Location: liverpool

Postby bigmick » Sat Aug 28, 2010 4:47 pm

Bad Bob wrote:
In and Out wrote:Okay I'll try and add a bit of decent discussion to this thread.

FWIW the formation Roy chooses will need time to be bedded in especially if it's a 4-4-2. Last night was the first time N'gog and Torres played upfront together. He surely needs the privelidge of finding the best dynamics with the players at his disposal, unfortunately some of those players shouldn't be near the first team squad on such a regular basis, whatever...


I wasn't that impressed with Citeh to be honest we weren't on the back ropes so to speak we were just chasing shadows most of the night. Those shadows were being chased in midfield and it's not as if they were attacking us at will. Tevez IMO was the difference between our strikers and theirs, he made the ball stick, he controlled the ball brillantly shrugged a player off and waited for support. Something either N'gog or Torres couldn't do, Kuyt to was guily of trapping the ball further than John Madden can kick.

It was the same under the previous manager our ball retention as a team overall is so fecking poor in comparison to at least half a dozen sides in the Prem. Instead of retaining the ball our lads are to quick and from to deep always looking to play the killer pass, it's to predictable. Jovonovic was a dissapoint last night, infact the midfield four as a unit were, both Jovanovic and Kuyt were largely inefficient out wide. Nothing really clicked, we did have a few nice patterns of play during the first half and a little pressure in the second half but isn't nearly enough. I remember when we played this formation under Rafa and couldn't get a win for toffee, then all of a sudden he went 4.2.3.1 and we went on a role, the team dynamics were better. Perhaps after looking at that last night we don't really have the personel to play a 4-4-2 and even if we do it will take a hell of a lot of work to get it working.

We played 4-4-2 under Houllier and that worked (different players of course) and the one thing I did notice compared to last nights game was that Houllier always had the two banks of four tight together. It was a unit, first the oppo would have to break down a wall of four and do the same against the defence to get a sight on goal. We were hard to break down, but last night there was no discipline players were caught out here and out of poition there, we didn't look like a unit it looked erratic.

Citeh on the other hand played lovely little composed triangles and their ability and control on the ball made certain players on our side look like amateurs. Firstly their retention was class and their movement off the ball was good ours was non-exsistant and that has nothing to do with ROy at this early stage of his season, we've always been like this even under Rafa. Yet Roy went for an expansive approach maybe due to force changes or whatever it didn't pay off, he'll learn from it. It will take more transfers unfortunatley to get the right players in who look comfortable with the ball at their feet, Cole being one of them, Aquallani perhaps would have been another.

I'm not going to loose sleep over this as no way can I see this season being anyworse than last seasons shambolic displays, just give the guy a chance ffs.

Good post.  I would add two things that have been said before but were illustrated again last night:

1) Kuyt is not especially suited to the RM role in a 4-4-2.  He spent half the night dropping into CM to get the ball off Lucas or Gerrard, which meant that our shape was all wrong.  When he did get the ball, he did little with it because he's not a play-maker from the middle of the park.  When he got it out wide, his distribution was poor and his ability to retain possession was weak.  Johnson had a bad night at the office behind him, which didn't help either.

2) Ngog doesn't hold the ball up particularly well at all.  That's a liability whenever he plays, whether as a lone striker or as a foil for Torres.  He needs to get much stronger at holding off defenders as, far too often, he gets brushed aside when the ball comes into feet and we're under the cosh once more.  The lad's shown that he can be useful as an out and out striker (fox in the box type) but we need much more than that from our forwards regardless of the system we play.  They must be able to retain possession and bring teammates into play.

Two good posts here.


Some of the wrist slashing on this thread is frightening. We've only lost the one match and people are already throwing themselves under buses. I really hope we don't match last seasons tally of 19 defeats, by about the tenth we are going to have the special branch investigating a spate of suicides of a bunch of people connected only by their love of Liverpool Football Club and their use of an otherwise obscure football discussion forum.

My take was that we weren't very good, and Man City were. Micah Richards was absolutely monsterous, and Kuyt in a 4-4-2 along with N'Gog in a parnership was never going to work. Lucas was awful, as was Jovanovic and we were distinctly second best.

The reason? It's the owners (innit).
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".
User avatar
bigmick
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12166
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:19 pm
Location: Wimbledon, London.

Postby fivecups » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:15 pm

bigmick wrote:The reason? It's the owners (innit).

This threads working quite well Mick. I know I bang on about the owners/Rafa as much as anyone else (I'm having a break from it at present  :D) but I think it would be good if we kept it away from this one.
User avatar
fivecups
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 4264
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 12:32 am
Location: Belfast

Postby RED BEERGOGGLES » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:23 pm

As long is its not the Happy bus eh Mick we wouldn't want that veering  of course ,avoiding all the impending suicides your so obsessed with
as for how Roys Liverpool is evolving ....well lets be honest to truly evolve something needs to change ,so until it does go through any form of metamorphosis .......the simplified answer would be" its not "
Image
User avatar
RED BEERGOGGLES
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8297
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 11:03 pm
Location: Liverpool

Postby Emerald Red » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:04 pm

Octsky wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
Octsky wrote:so far Roy has been correcting Rafa's mistakes, n very much work-in-progress.

Sami Hypia: rafa (sold off), Roy (try to sign back, club wont release)

Peter Crouch: rafa (sold off), Roy (try to sign back, scored hat trick to put spurs into Champs league)

Bellamy: rafa, sold. few BPL club wants to sign him but deem too dangerous for ManC, loan to div 1

Aurellio:Rafa, sold. Roy, Resign

Alonso: rafa, sold, player lost faith in manager, signs Aquaman as replacement.

Aquaman: Rafa, Signed, injured for 3 months, didnt play much, fitness still a doubt. Roy, loan to Juve to save wage n protect value.

Arbeloa: Rafa, sold. player spend majority season on RM's bench. spend 18m to sign Johnson.
as a result we have no back up striker for Torres. Roy, looking for backup striker bf transfer window close in a few wks time.

Reira n Beneyou: useful wingers, fed up with Rafa, sold. Roy, signs Joe Cole.

Lucas: featured too much under Rafa. Roy, sign Poulsen to increase competition.

Highly rated youngsters: not used by rafa. Roy, trying to blend them slowly into 1st team.

i just hope that Roy wont commit too many mistakes for the next manager (if) to correct them again.

Some of the biggest, most lopsided bollox I've ever read on this forum, and that is a statement right there in itself. Absolutely unreal how a person can spew so much sh*te in a single post.

we did resign Aurellio, tried to resign Hypia, strong linked with Crouch, Bellamy (to some extend).

Reira and Benny, Alonso left becoz they couldn't spend another min with Rafa. Joe cole came in.

Dani Pacheno threatens to leave, and get the number 15 instead of #42 from Roy and starts to feature for the first team.

the season we sign Johnson is the season Torres got injured for half of the season n we arent covered.

saw from the board we signed Raúl meireles. so if RM is signed to replace masch, the Poulsen is signed for what??
to replace Lucas.

ya loads of rubbish. Rafa shouldnt have left, n now he is talking of changing Inter, present euro champs n treble winners for the better after they lost in the Super cup.

Admit it: you were just talking bollox and move on from there, shall we?
Image
User avatar
Emerald Red
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7289
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:22 pm
Location: Ireland

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 69 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e