kazza » Mon Oct 03, 2022 9:03 am wrote:To be fair they did make us a football giant, and we have been buying expensive players. The only thing is we cannot compete with the mega rich clubs because those few teams are in a league of their own. City, PSG basically have open cheques that are paid for by oil rich governments. The money has no accountability as those are not democratic countries, how can anyone compete with that, they have a nations public funds. We have been breaking our own record for money spent on players consistently. I get what people are complaining about the owners but the deck is stacked in their favor and the fact we have pushed city all the way is an incredible achievement in itself.
It is a business but there are much worse owners out there than ours.
redshade » Mon Oct 03, 2022 10:29 am wrote:kazza » Mon Oct 03, 2022 9:03 am wrote:To be fair they did make us a football giant, and we have been buying expensive players. The only thing is we cannot compete with the mega rich clubs because those few teams are in a league of their own. City, PSG basically have open cheques that are paid for by oil rich governments. The money has no accountability as those are not democratic countries, how can anyone compete with that, they have a nations public funds. We have been breaking our own record for money spent on players consistently. I get what people are complaining about the owners but the deck is stacked in their favor and the fact we have pushed city all the way is an incredible achievement in itself.
It is a business but there are much worse owners out there than ours.
Post by electrum mate.
"In the last 4 years when we have had major success:-
Spurs £325mil net spend
West Ham £280mil net spend
Wolves £166mil net spend
Man Utd £501mil net spend
Notts FOREST £130mil net spend
Fulham £91mil net spend
Crystal Palace £106mil net spend
Leeds £120mil net spend
Everton £105mil net spend
Aston Villa £255mil net spend
Arsenal £375mil net spend
Liverpool £90mil net spend
None of the above are oil state owned and considering new stands,new Stadiums No champions league for most of the above clubs they all manage to outspend us."
The fact that they're talking about expanding the stadium instead of improving the team shows you exactly what's going wrong at the club.electrum » Sat Oct 29, 2022 9:53 pm wrote:The complete lack of ambition and interest in staying at the top from FSG is now reaping its (non) rewards. They have been static in the transfer market for 3 years and hope that a one off signing every now and again whilst recouping as much as they can (see net spend) is enough to placate the fan base.
Sadly many reds still think they are the best thing since sliced bread. The truth they have been the luckiest owners in living memory - Klopp joins Liverpool and we get 140m for Coutinho. Without these two events we would have already been also rans (top half of the table) and won nothing.
Once Klopp goes we will be mid-table for a generation/ until we get lucky again (not likely). On the seasons showing so far we may well already be a top 6 team at best.
FSG are not here to win things they, are here to reap as much profit as possible whilst staying in/ flirting with the top 4- anything else for them is a bonus.
It's time for them to sell up and go.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.