by haps » Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:29 am
2001 was great ... no doubt. and there shouldn't be any disrespect to that achievement. the manager played his part. it looked rosy. we all thought it was the beginning. we were all wrong, i guess. houllier is a good man and deserves a nice job somewhere and a happy life. i really can't endorse his continued reign at liverpool fc though. he has gone as far as he can. thank you. and welcome martin o' neill, a brilliant tactician, man-motivator, passionate managerial genius with his best days ahead of him. sir alex knows that he can't do much more and the tide has turned. i've got a feeling about the direction he's going to take next ... or soon, at least. i don't want THEM getting the best man out there to perk up their years of domination. have you SEEN arsenal year ... course you have ... they are phenomenal. why can't we get these players? why not us? we can. given the right person to spot them. wenger is a genius and sure, he's got some money but nothing like chelski etc. this arsenal team will take everything for years unless we step up with chelsea. we've got a great nucleus - owen, hyppia, kirkland, hamman, the brilliant stevie gerrard and diouff ... sorry just joking ... but we've got some. we're not as far off as you might think. one thing that does have to happen though is a different playing philosophy. a good manager like o'neill can bring us that. thats it. and if we donb't get o'neill , maybe curbishley would do the job. we need a man like that.