el_stinger wrote:Ace Ventura wrote:el_stinger wrote:Viduka's role can easily be thwarted, put 2 men on him.
El Stinger i havent read many of your posts on any other issue so i'm not sure whether you constantly post bizarre remarks, but unless you've got a world class player put 2 men on anyone and they will struggle to get involved.
I dont know what Viduka is like for Australia nor do i actually care, but to say he is sh@te cos if you put 2 men on him he struggles is stupid beyong comprehension.
Not meaning to insult ye but think about it.
FWIW i think Viduka is quite a lazy player when i have seen him, but on his day can be a very strong awkward forward.
His goalscoring record for Australia obviously isn't good enough, but if 2 men are marking him then its making space for other players.
That was an example of what he did during the Uruguay game. He is constantly used up front as a lone striker, and is easily thwarted by putting 2 blokes on him. Of course he is going to have sh1t matches if he is constantly put into this position. That was what I was referring to in my previous posts.
Your post here seems to contradict everythink you have said previously in this thread.
As i said i am not really bothered about Viduka...only Kewell getting back fit, but from reading the general remarks on this thread from others....he is doing the job the manager asks of him...holding the ball up, and allowing others more space.
I also think you are being harsh based on the team Australia were facing and the fact that it was away in a hostile atmosphere.
I think its a good result that gives Australia every chance to make the finals.