mgabby wrote:I understand, but still can't agree.
Let's say there is another terror attack in London by Bin Laden...
Do you think in that case (due to the high risk) games should be played away from England?
Terror and risk is EVERYWHERE these days.
It happend in New York, in London, in Madrid, Istanbul (many times) Moscow and many other places.
I can understand that you might want to go to a "less" risky place than Israel. But Hey, we all know England is a target of Bin Laden due to your part in the war in Iraq. So let's play in a "less risky" place.
I say, first leg in Sweeden. ok?
I know why you can't agree. You fight terror by getting on woth your lives and showing that you are not afraid but I do not see what is going on between Israel and Lebanon as terror, I see it as war, and war is something to fear.
By the way Sweden is fine by me but can we play the second leg in Holland
