Benny The Noon » Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:35 pm wrote:
Did the police really say there was no physical evidence of a bite ? Can you show me where they said that please.
So can you tell me why the club then accepted the charges if youre saying that Suarez didnt actually bite him ?
Why with lawyers etc they didnt press ahead with a case to deny it all - you seem pretty confident he only "licked" him and didnt actually bite him.
Maybe the evidence is not being released to the public
Suarez has admitted it ffs you cant get anymore conclusive than that
You said the police said there was no evidence - can you show me where you got that information from[/quote]
from the telegraph.
"Merseyside Police can confirm that, following an incident at the Liverpool v Chelsea game yesterday, officers have spoken to Branislav Ivanovic in person," a statement from Merseyside Police read.
"He had no apparent physical injuries and did not wish to make a complaint.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... d-ban.html
from the F.A Statement after todays verdict.
"The Uruguay international was charged this week following a clash with Chelsea's Branislav Ivanovic during Sunday's 2-2 Barclays Premier League draw at Anfield in which Suarez appeared to bite the arm of the Serbia centre-back".
http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/news ... h-ban.html
the police has said there was no injury and the F.A say he appeared to bite him. the referee's attention was drawn to the incident seconds after and yet he made no note of seeing bitemarks. if he did he would have given a straight red to suarez but he didnt.
in fairness to friend he obviously didnt see the attempt at a bite and seen as there was no evidence on ivanovich he brushed it off.
the club has accepted a charge of violent conduct and rightly so. show me where they accepted a charge of a bite ? somebody from the club or even suarez's admission that he actually did bite ivanovich or even ivanovichs statement saying that luis had actually bitten him?
if he did bite him do you not think he would have made a statement to both the police and F.A.? i probably would have and i know you would of so why did'nt ivanovich?. cmon surely he would have at least taken a picture of the injury received while it was fresh?
Definition of bite
verb (past bit /bɪt/; past participle bitten /ˈbɪt(ə)n/)
[with object]
1use the teeth to cut into (something):
the woman’s arm was bitten off by an alligator
[no object]:
Rosa bit into a cream cake
use the teeth in order to inflict injury on:
she had bitten, scratched, and kicked her assailant
(of a snake, insect, or spider) wound with fangs, pincers, or a sting:
while on holiday she was bitten by an adder
http://oxforddictionaries.com/definitio ... ite?q=bite
show me where the evidence of any thing like those definition's happened to ivanovich ? the difference is benny i know our player attempted to bite him where as you fully believe he did to the point that you could probably actually see the flesh leaving his arm by now.
unless you can produce evidence that an actual bite took place dont bother taking offence when someone refers to the attempted biting incident as being licked.
[1].gif)
