eds » Mon Apr 22, 2013 2:33 am wrote:Football is hilarious these days.
You have players that go in trying to break other players legs, escape any sort of punishment, any sort of articles written about them, any sort of condemnation.
Yet you have a player here who has given another player a cheeky "love bite" and the media circus begins AGAIN.
While all the little lemmings jump for joy including a large part of our "fan base"

I think it is possibly more about the transfer of blood and infecting somebody with a horrible disease.Very unlikely but not impossible. The implications therefore of biting somebody could be fatal.With Suarez's track record he should be more than aware of this.
This is an extract from a responsible website:
Can HIV be transmitted by human bite?
It is very rare, but in specific circumstances HIV can be transmitted by a human bite. In 1997, CDC published findings from a state health department investigation of an incident that suggested blood-to-blood transmission of HIV by a human bite. There have been other rare reports in the medical literature in which HIV appeared to have been transmitted by a human bite. Biting is not a common way of transmitting HIV, in fact, there are numerous reports of bites that did not result in HIV infection. Severe trauma with extensive tissue damage and the presence of blood were reported in each of the instances where transmission was documented or suspected. Bites that do not involve broken skin have no risk for HIV transmission, as intact skin acts as a barrier to HIV transmission.
Summary:
There is no risk from a bite where the skin is not broken.
There is a remote risk of transmission by human bite. All documented cases where transmission did occur included severe trauma with extensive tissue damage and the presence of blood.