stmichael wrote:Redrider wrote:Fowler is correct, Kewell at his best has more to offer than Duff. Better to nurture what we have, than waste money on an expensive 'luxury player'.
I am still not convinced that Duff is as good as his press. Does he actually deliver as much as he promises, I think not.
ok that's fair enough, but when playing, who is the more consistent? think about it. harry kewell can be brilliant for 3 games then cr@p for 10. with duff you know what you're getting every time.
Kewell is a mercuial player and when he is hot he is hot but when he is cold he is freezing but at 5 million he was a bit of steal. I doubt we would get Duff on the cheap