NANNY RED wrote:Man of the match for me, still played well even after getting his yellow, made up for him.
woof woof ! wrote:Thought the fella had a decent game. As some have mentioned he does seem to play with a bit more "authority" when not playing alongside another DM, almost as if he no longer has to decide what his role is and is a bit more comfrotable and assertive as he goes about his business. Still wouldn't class him as a top of the shop midfielder but he does at last look like a premiership player.
Aqualani. Very early days BUT (:D ), someones gotta tell the fella that there are others in the team apart from Gerrard. Seemed to me (I might be wrong) that he constantly looked to feed Gerrard even when Stevie had 2-3 men on him, meanwhile there were others just begging for the easy ball.
Emerald Red wrote:woof woof ! wrote:Thought the fella had a decent game. As some have mentioned he does seem to play with a bit more "authority" when not playing alongside another DM, almost as if he no longer has to decide what his role is and is a bit more comfrotable and assertive as he goes about his business. Still wouldn't class him as a top of the shop midfielder but he does at last look like a premiership player.
Aqualani. Very early days BUT (:D ), someones gotta tell the fella that there are others in the team apart from Gerrard. Seemed to me (I might be wrong) that he constantly looked to feed Gerrard even when Stevie had 2-3 men on him, meanwhile there were others just begging for the easy ball.
I know what you're talking about. When Aquilani made that pass into Gerrard's feet, Andy Gray spouted some bollox about it being a difficult ball with the "easy" ball being Yossi out wide. I disagree. Gerrard attracted three defenders that were too close to him. It was a cracking ball into his feet, and had Gerrard controlled it better and spun his markers, he was clean through. People moan about us not being direct enough with forward passing. Well, my gripe is that we are sometimes too narrow. In the Wolves game, I noticed Aquilani lifting his head to play a forward pass out in wide areas, and often no one was there.
As for Lucas, he' improving at such a rate that I no longer feel uncomfortable when he' named in the starting team. He is no longer a squad player.
Gerrard attracted three defenders that were too close to him. It was a cracking ball into his feet, and had Gerrard controlled it better and spun his markers, he was clean through.
woof woof ! wrote:Emerald Red wrote:woof woof ! wrote:Thought the fella had a decent game. As some have mentioned he does seem to play with a bit more "authority" when not playing alongside another DM, almost as if he no longer has to decide what his role is and is a bit more comfrotable and assertive as he goes about his business. Still wouldn't class him as a top of the shop midfielder but he does at last look like a premiership player.
Aqualani. Very early days BUT (:D ), someones gotta tell the fella that there are others in the team apart from Gerrard. Seemed to me (I might be wrong) that he constantly looked to feed Gerrard even when Stevie had 2-3 men on him, meanwhile there were others just begging for the easy ball.
I know what you're talking about. When Aquilani made that pass into Gerrard's feet, Andy Gray spouted some bollox about it being a difficult ball with the "easy" ball being Yossi out wide. I disagree. Gerrard attracted three defenders that were too close to him. It was a cracking ball into his feet, and had Gerrard controlled it better and spun his markers, he was clean through. People moan about us not being direct enough with forward passing. Well, my gripe is that we are sometimes too narrow. In the Wolves game, I noticed Aquilani lifting his head to play a forward pass out in wide areas, and often no one was there.
As for Lucas, he' improving at such a rate that I no longer feel uncomfortable when he' named in the starting team. He is no longer a squad player.
Not talking about "one pass" here EM, watch the game again and you'll see that time and again Aqualani looked for Gerrard, not neccesarily a bad thing BUT were yer man is shut down by 2-3 oppo players feeding the ball to a teamate who's open might just be the better decision
Gerrard attracted three defenders that were too close to him. It was a cracking ball into his feet, and had Gerrard controlled it better and spun his markers, he was clean through.
Percentages mate, "had Gerrard controlled it better" surrounded by three markers ?. Yeah no pressure Steve, just recieve those balls all night and get the sh'it kicked out of yer for no reason.
Sorry EM, for once i agree with Andy Gray.
Emerald Red wrote:Which would you rather see, though: a square pass to the wide players who had no joy all night (we were very flat out wide) or making risky passes direct to the front men with a change one of them may pay off? I'd rather see more direct football from us, that's for sure. Can't fault a player for trying.
bigmick wrote:Lucas is barely Birmingham standard, infact he isn't. He wouold n't get a game in front of either Barry Ferguson or Lee Bowyer. He isn't in the same stratosphere as nannies mate Scott Parker either.
redbeergoggles wrote:bigmick wrote:Lucas is barely Birmingham standard, infact he isn't. He wouold n't get a game in front of either Barry Ferguson or Lee Bowyer. He isn't in the same stratosphere as nannies mate Scott Parker either.
Lucas was one of the best players on the pitch against Birmingham so to compare him to Lee Bowyer who he completely outplayed in that particular game is a bit lame Michael ,I think we need to put aside this personal dislike for the lad , and accept most premiership sides would welcome Lucas to their midfield with open arms ,Birmingham being one of the aforementioned sides
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 58 guests