Liverpool FC Forum

by **Madmax** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:05 pm

lool jose if true i wonder what set him off..

by **Effes** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:41 pm

stmichael wrote:
GYBS wrote:Maureen Assault

Anyone still want this classless bellend representing our club?

I think if he did slap a Man U fan - surely that will be soemthing endearing?

by **Bad Bob** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:58 pm

I'm not Jose's biggest fan but I'd been astonished if this were true. It just reeks of a stitch-up by some Manc muppet. I did like this bit from the news piece though:

"Inter Milan have denied the allegations, saying Mourinho had a "very calm post-game experience"."

A post-match experience? :laugh:

by **account deleted by request** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:07 pm

Bad Bob wrote:I'm not Jose's biggest fan but I'd been astonished if this were true. It just reeks of a stitch-up by some Manc muppet. I did like this bit from the news piece though:

"Inter Milan have denied the allegations, saying Mourinho had a "very calm post-game experience"."

A post-match experience?

Maybe Nanny was there ?

by **Bad Bob** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:14 pm

s@int wrote:
Bad Bob wrote:I'm not Jose's biggest fan but I'd been astonished if this were true. It just reeks of a stitch-up by some Manc muppet. I did like this bit from the news piece though:

"Inter Milan have denied the allegations, saying Mourinho had a "very calm post-game experience"."

A post-match experience?

Maybe Nanny was there ?

A does sound like an amusement park ride, doesn't it?

(ducks and runs...)

by **bigmick** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:16 pm

The irony of it all. And the to think some of the very same people who have completely ruined this thread, had a pop at me for most of last week about ruining threads. You couldn't make it up really.

Back onto the subjects which have been covered.

Mourinho's "assault". We'll see what happens. Apparently the man who made the complaint had no injuries and required no medical assistance. The Inter people are saying they know absolutely nothing of what happened. Lets be serious here :laugh:

At the absolute worst (as the bloke is supposed to have jumped infront of Mourinho and shouted "you're going home") Mourinho will have shoved him out of the way. As a couple have said, the hypocracy when when of our own players is due in court, when one of our own players was done for throwing coins back into the crowd is funny really. Forum silliness once again.

On the point of the Premiership domination, yet more irony :laugh:

That the people who constantly moan that we're shopping in Tesco's argue for the status quo to remain as is in Europe and can't see the contradiction is staggering really. "Since the year dot" indeed. In my view, something needs to be done in both competitions. I don't think it's possible to engineer a situation where Bolton can win the Champions League, and nor am I asking for that. They should though be able to even out the playing field. Two obvious ways of doing that are to have a finite number of players which a team can use during the course of a season (24 maximum for example) and a salary cap per team, which is obviously tailored to the respective economics of football in each country. The best teams would still win most things, but at least it would even out the playing field a bit.

The danger if you don't do that is that the European competitions for starters become a nonsense. I've been saying for two years now that the Champions League is relatively easy for the big clubs until the last eight, and it is. If you get the same clubs getting to the same stage each season, people will lose interest. Why bother with all the prelims, just give the English clubs and Barca a bye to the quarters and let everyone else fight it out for a golden ticket? Once again by limiting squad numbers, it wouldn't be possible for the Premiership teams or for Barca to field practically a different team for European games than they do for Premiership games. The likes of us, Manchester United and the like would suffer because playing in a stronger league would impact upon your playing resources a little. I still think one of the big five would win it, but you wouldn't be able to predict four of the last eight, and a minimum of three of the last four like you can now. My suspicion is that some people like the format as is because our certainty of success backs up their theories on a variety of subjects, which is handy for them but not necessarily good for the game.

Lastly, onto the subject matter opf the thread, Mourinho. I was gutted they didn't prevail at Old Trafford, but having watched the game I think they gave it a good go against a much better team. As we know conceding a goal in the first couple of minutes at Manure can lead to a rout, but they avoided that. They actually played pretty well, hit the woodwork twice and spurned a number of chances. Their best chance of springing something was always to be close enough near the end to give the game and Man Utd a touch of the jitters. Unfortunately for them and everyone else, poor finishing, bad luck and not good enough defending from a corner ensured thay never quite got there. Mourinho the man was dignified at the end as he usually is, and the Mancs march on. I really enjoyed the joust though as he locked horns again with Ferguson, and despite having an army which was severely outgunned, he managed to mount an effective guerilla war which while ultimately unsuccessful, was a very good effort under the circumstances.

by **GYBS** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:52 pm

Like i said saint some people will grab something and wont let it go like a dog with a bone - As for the hypocrasy people have already explained that there view on maureen and the person he is hasnt changed because of what has happened last night - that view was there before . And im pretty sure not many people defend a certain player for throwing a coin back into the crowd just like if another certain player is found guilty he himself will be rightly critized , so think maybe its more of a case of trying to find something to grab and use against people that isnt even there in the first place , and year dot thing is grabbing something and no doubt will be brought up once again many times in the future in some sort of novel along the lines just like other things constantly get brought up all the time .

by **bigmick** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:57 pm

GYBS wrote:Like i said saint some people will grab something and wont let it go like a dog with a bone - As for the hypocrasy people have already explained that there view on maureen and the person he is hasnt changed because of what has happened last night - that view was there before . And im pretty sure not many people defend a certain player for throwing a coin back into the crowd just like if another certain player is found guilty he himself will be rightly critized , so think maybe its more of a case of trying to find something to grab and use against people that isnt even there in the first place , and year dot thing is grabbing something and no doubt will be brought up once again many times in the future in some sort of novel along the lines just like other things constantly get brought up all the time .

This is a good outcome because it saves us having an arguement and spoiling the thread. I've read this, and I haven't the faintest idea what you are talking about, so we'll leave it at that.

I'm not asking for a clarification BTW, it's all good

by **Sabre** » Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:45 am

maypaxvobiscum wrote:the hypocrisy amazes me sometimes.

I agree there are big hypocrites here, it's sad that the ability that some posters have to find flaws in Rafa's personality is only rivaled by the ease of the same people to defend Mourinho. They can find arrogance and losing the plot in Rafa reading a paper, but they can defend a manager in the situation of landing a punch, regardless confirmed or not. They do not ask the same prudence to check the truth of an article when the article slags Benitez.

Hypocrisy of the highest order, yes.

There's only one thing worse than hipocrites, that's hipocrites' pets, those who have no autonomy and are beside the hipocrites to agree whatever they say.

I never considered you an hypocrite, Max

by **GYBS** » Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:52 am

I like the Hipocrites pet bit - that seems very apt these days

by **Sabre** » Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:22 am

Yeh, normally the pets are there to be ignored, but if they start barking and calling members here WUM and Hypocrites they need a good kick sometimes. Not to be taken too seriously anyway.

by **bigmick** » Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:30 am

Since we're having a purge on thread ruiners and the like, lets stick to the subject matter in hand eh fellas? You wanted more football discussion, it seems there is more. You wanted less threads which talk about our manager while we weren't doing well, you got it. You want more threads which talk about the manager now we've had a great result, you got it. What is the problem now

Lets jusy stick to talking about what the thread title is. Hypocrites pet? Feck me lads get a grip.

by **GYBS** » Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:37 am

Have a look back and see where it went off topic and the hyprisey was mentioned mate :;):

it may be a refreshing change to the normal accused .

by **bigmick** » Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:42 am

GYBS wrote:Have a look back and see where it went off topic and the hyprisey was mentioned mate it may be a refreshing change to the normal accused .

I've got a better idea. Why don't we not bother looking back, because to be quite frank I couldn't care less

. Why don't we discuss I think it was Sabre's question about did Inter offer up any clues about how to play against Man Utd, it's more interesting and it does kind of relate to the thread title.

by **Sabre** » Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:44 am

bigmick wrote:Since we're having a purge on thread ruiners and the like, lets stick to the subject matter in hand eh fellas? You wanted more football discussion, it seems there is more. You wanted less threads which talk about our manager while we weren't doing well, you got it. You want more threads which talk about the manager now we've had a great result, you got it. What is the problem now

Lets jusy stick to talking about what the thread title is. Hypocrites pet? Feck me lads get a grip.

Sssssshhhhhhhh Bigmick.

You can't ignore people calling WUM and hypocrites other members and then only react to the answer to those.

Let the mods do their cleaning stuff, you obviously see one side of the problem.

Liverpool FC Forum

Jose mourinho. - Miracle or myth.

Who is online