by Owzat » Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:58 am
I see passing stats aplenty, the generally don't vary too much and the crucial aspect is not whether a pass was successful/completed but a) what happened with the ones that weren't and, b) whether the pass put the recepient in trouble, in the clear, was the best pass etc. ie you really need to see "what happened next" to get a fuller picture.
Like with shots, and tackles, they can make it look like one player has done more than another but do they highlight CRUCIAL tackles, or differentiate between shots blocked on the line, shots that result in a penalty, shots that are from distance straight into the keeper's gloves etc. Football has stats and plenty of use for them, but some of the match stats are not really good for much - doesn't mean they aren't interesting, just some could read too much into them. Certainly seem to be more prevalent at the moment than last season. Perhaps the case for the prosecution of blaming Lucas for everything and Aquaman being the answer to everything, the cure to the disease that is Lucas, is getting hotter. It sure beats blaming the manager, after all it's Lucas' fault he is in the side, that Rafa is trying to play the same formation without the right components to make it work.
I stand by my point that if he is the only player weak enough to deserve criticism then the rest should be pulling their weight more. Players have bad games, doesn't mean the team has to lose each of them. There are ELEVEN players in the side, so even if Lucas is so bad he has a bad game every game, that doesn't mean we have to lose SIX games. After all it isn't like he's scored 10 own goals, given away 10 penalties and let his marker go or passed straight to an opponent for another 10 goals. A lot of the goals we concede are from set-pieces or poor play, although in fairness a few have criticised the CBs as well but still we're not scoring enough goals and that can't entirely be blamed on Lucas. We've scored only once in the last four games, if you take out the big wins over Hull, Stoke and Burnley (all promoted last season or season before), then we've scored only 11 goals in the remaining 10 games.
09/10 Goals Scored
0 goals : P3 W0 D0 L3 F0 A5 (Won 0.00%)
1 goal : P5 W2 D0 L3 F5 A7 (Won 40.00%)
2 goals : P0 W0 D0 L0 F0 A0 (Won n/a)
3+ goals : P5 W5 D0 L0 F20 A5 (Won 100.00%)
So as I've long maintained, that isn't the first time I've done that set of stats, we don't score enough goals often enough. The two 1-0s were against Leeds of league one and Debrecen of Hungary, neither a side we should be scraping past and Debrecen got FOUR goals put past them I believe by both Fiorentina and Lyon who both beat us. For a more attacking outlook side, we're not scoring many that often and it seems to be only the likes of Bolton, West Ham, Burnley, Stoke and Hull so nothing much to brag about.
Never buy from PC World, product quality is poor and their 'customer service' is even poorer