JoeTerp wrote:Ace Ventura wrote:SupitsJonF wrote:He wont be in reserves, he will be in Man U's starting line up.
Selling them is the best thing that could happen to them, and I hope he stays. 120 mil added to Manchesters summer bank account could make things bad fast.
I know this is nothing to do with our rumour mill so please dont hunt me down and destroy me Debo...i mean misty![]()
But why is mu losing there star player a bad thing![]()
No matter how much money they get, they have to replace him with someone with similar ability and who could make the team be able to play in the same defensive counter attacking way.
Name me that player...no matter how much money ?
a good amount of their team is getting older and they could shore it all up sharpish with a whole new generation with the ronaldo money
Eh ?
They dont have an old team at all mate, there are a couple of players like Scholes and Giggs getting on, possibly Van der Sar, but the rest of the team are not old at all.
Also Ferguson hasnt exactly been hampered in the transfer market as it is, after winning the league 2 seasons ago, he went out and spent 17 million apiece on Nani and Anderson a similar amount on Hargreaves and brought in Tevez who will be on really high wages.
Getting shedloads of money for Ronaldo is neither here nor there, replacing there star player. The player who allows the team to play the way they do is another.
I cant see any player that they could sign that could replace him.
They would have to change the way the play imo if they lose him.
It could only be a good thing for us and any other rival team if he goes to Madrid.