Liverpool FC Forum

StuYesThatStu » Tue Oct 29, 2013 12:22 pm wrote:

7_Kewell » Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:03 am wrote:Superb player, who should be one of the first names on the team sheet, every week.  Even now, I laugh when I think of Chelsea selling him to us for £12 million 

He's worth double that now

Chelsea sold him because they have better players.

We got what we paid for.

Top scorer in the league currently and in s.hit hot form. They got Torres for 50 million.   

I'd say we got more than what we paid for.

Kenny Kan » Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:58 pm wrote:

Ben Patrick » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:42 pm wrote:Good post. One thing sturridge has that cole didn't is a shot from range but I see what you mean about levels. Cole scored a shed loads of goals and hopefully sturridge will carry on doing.

He also has more allround ability IMO. Also, remember Cole couldn't hit a cow's @rse with a banjo at times, he'd need at least 5 decent chances to put 1 away, wasn't the most clinical of poachers.

Complete myth.

Cr*p post.

StuYesThatStu » Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:00 pm wrote:

Kenny Kan » Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:58 pm wrote:

Ben Patrick » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:42 pm wrote:Good post. One thing sturridge has that cole didn't is a shot from range but I see what you mean about levels. Cole scored a shed loads of goals and hopefully sturridge will carry on doing.

He also has more allround ability IMO. Also, remember Cole couldn't hit a cow's @rse with a banjo at times, he'd need at least 5 decent chances to put 1 away, wasn't the most clinical of poachers.

Complete myth.

Cr*p post.

Like most of your posts you mean. 

The football pundit who makes a mug of himself.

Kenny Kan » Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:00 pm wrote:

StuYesThatStu » Tue Oct 29, 2013 12:22 pm wrote:

7_Kewell » Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:03 am wrote:Superb player, who should be one of the first names on the team sheet, every week.  Even now, I laugh when I think of Chelsea selling him to us for £12 million 

He's worth double that now

Chelsea sold him because they have better players.

We got what we paid for.

Top scorer in the league currently and in s.hit hot form. They got Torres for 50 million.   

I'd say we got more than what we paid for.

It can't be any clearer who got the better deal. Currently Sturridge is a better goal scoring striker

Hmm, 229 goals in 509 games and he couldn't hit a cow's ***** with a banjo? Ok lad if you say so!

StuYesThatStu » Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:13 pm wrote:Hmm, 229 goals in 509 games and he couldn't hit a cow's ***** with a banjo? Ok lad if you say so!

fck me, Mark Lawerson's son is back. 

Kenny Kan » Tue Oct 29, 2013 2:01 pm wrote:

StuYesThatStu » Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:00 pm wrote:[quote="[url=http://www.liverpoolfc-newkit.co.uk/viewtopic.php?p=1222487#p1222487]Kenny Kan » Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:58 pm[/urlGood post. One thing sturridge has that cole didn't is a shot from range but I see what you mean about levels. Cole scored a shed loads of goals and hopefully sturridge will carry on doing.

He also has more allround ability IMO. Also, remember Cole couldn't hit a cow's @rse with a banjo at times, he'd need at least 5 decent chances to put 1 away, wasn't the most clinical of poachers.

Complete myth.

Cr*p post.[/quote]

Like most of your posts you mean. 

The football pundit who makes a mug of himself.[/quote]


And there's me thinking you 2 were in cahoots for a minute

this Russian doll avoidance software makes a right pigs ear of reply quotes

supersub » Tue Oct 29, 2013 4:25 pm wrote:this Russian doll avoidance software makes a right pigs ear of reply quotes

Is that what you're going with?

Kenny Kan » Tue Oct 29, 2013 2:01 pm wrote:
Complete myth.

Cr*p post.

Like most of your posts you mean. 

The football pundit who makes a mug of himself.

Sorry Kenny, just re-read that and it was a bit blunt.



Stand by it though.

StuYesThatStu » Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:00 pm wrote:

Kenny Kan » Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:58 pm wrote:

Ben Patrick » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:42 pm wrote:Good post. One thing sturridge has that cole didn't is a shot from range but I see what you mean about levels. Cole scored a shed loads of goals and hopefully sturridge will carry on doing.

He also has more allround ability IMO. Also, remember Cole couldn't hit a cow's @rse with a banjo at times, he'd need at least 5 decent chances to put 1 away, wasn't the most clinical of poachers.

Complete myth.

Cr*p post.

Disagree.... not a myth at all.

He was wasteful in front of goal. It took 7 chances before he would put one in the onion bag. Obviously that's an exaggeration but he was by no means a natural finisher. What was amazing about him was that he always got himself into positions to score. That takes some doing and youhave to give him credit for that. If he could finish like Owen or Fowler, he would have probably averaged close to a goal a match.

Sturridge is not as complete a player as andy cole. Much as it pains me to say it... but cole was the better player.... but he definitely couldn't hit a cow's @rse with a banjo

I do think that Sturridge is a good player though. But he really needs to do more. At times he strikes me as being a little lazy. For the money that we paid for him, he is an absolute bargain..... a superb buy.. bang for the pound-wise.

StuYesThatStu » Wed Oct 30, 2013 1:21 am wrote:

Kenny Kan » Tue Oct 29, 2013 2:01 pm wrote:
Complete myth.

Cr*p post.

Like most of your posts you mean. 

The football pundit who makes a mug of himself.

Sorry Kenny, just re-read that and it was a bit blunt.



Stand by it though.

Watch out, SS thought we were in cahoots. 

Kenny Kan » Wed Oct 30, 2013 5:09 am wrote:

StuYesThatStu » Wed Oct 30, 2013 1:21 am wrote:

Kenny Kan » Tue Oct 29, 2013 2:01 pm wrote:
Complete myth.

Cr*p post.

Like most of your posts you mean. 

The football pundit who makes a mug of himself.

Sorry Kenny, just re-read that and it was a bit blunt.



Stand by it though.

Watch out, SS thought we were in cahoots. 

Stu was trying to set up some love triangle for your birthday; 

StuYesThatStu » Tue Oct 29, 2013 12:22 pm wrote:Chelsea sold him because they have better players.

We got what we paid for.

Torres v Sturridge at current form...who got better player? and who got the better deal? sometime I do question your state of soberness.

I can understand if you're trying to be controversial to take over Alan Hansen's job (since you claimed to have played at a very high level) but then again I think you're drunk in front of your computer most of the time anyway