metalhead wrote:maguskwt wrote:stmichael wrote:“His introduction secured the point at least because he was very good when he came on,” Hodgson said. “He didn’t miss a pass and won several challenges.
“That’s what he was on there to do and he will get better. Without his introduction, with a very tired Maxi Rodriguez and Dirk Kuyt, who knows we could even have lost the game.![]()
you would have thought it was against the mancs, arsenal or chelsea...
![]()
Jeez, stop twisting words, we would have lost the game if we couldn't control our passes and keep possession, it was all there to see. I didn't agree with the Poulsen substitution, but Roy offers a reasonable explanation of the sub, by controlling the midfield, thats a valid explanation, so whats wrong? its because its Roy huh?
no one is twisting the words mate... it's there for all to see...
I'm talking about the attitude...
If, with the squad of internationals we cannot play an offensive game against Wigan then Roy is doing something wrong. Why couldn't he inspire the team to press higher up, why couldn't he command the team to pressure them? why did we play 80 minutes with 10 man behind the ball? No excuses the buck stops with Roy... there is something wrong with coaching and/or inspiring the team. What is the half time there for?
And before anyone says otherwise... it's not only about the loss either... it's about how we played, the tactics. We have time and time again backed off and let the other team play and we have either lost the game or drawn...