`Sensible rotation´ I would call it.

redtrader74 wrote:Derby(not won that one yet!)
bigmick wrote:I'm obviously really pleased we've started well, only a calamitous refereeing decision preventing us from having a league and cup 100% record. I'm more than a little concerned however that the wrong conclusions may be drawn from our last couple, and our next one result.
Already, the pro-rotationers are getting carried away because we made a stack of changes against Toulouse and still won comfortably. We also made a couple of changes against Sunderland and comfortably prevailed so what's the problem, surely it just proves Rafa was right all along? I'll tell you what, we'll make a load more changes on Saturday against Derby and we'll win again very comfortably. So rotation is working eh Mick![]()
Well lets get a couple of things straight here. Firstly, Sunderland and Toulouse are very poor teams. Derby on Saturday are a very poor team and Rafa could put Stu the Red up front and we'd probably still win. He could make eight changes from Toulouse and we'd probably still win. Does it prove that mass rotation is the way to go? No, it just proves that these are poor teams.
FWIW I thought and indeed think that Rafa has almost learned his lesson. The selection at Sunderland was mostly sensible (only Babbel for Riise being a typical "Rafaism") but Toulouse at Home was a bit more concerning.
This is what really bothers me. Once we've made half a dozen changes for the Derby game and still won comfortably, will Rafa remember that he played the same team for the first two games? Will he remember that in order to prevail at venues such as Fratton Park you need a team which is fully tunes up, not just players that are honed and ready to go, but a TEAM that is fully tuned up and together?
I've read a couple of times that now the squad is stronger than last season we should be able to rotate without weakening the team so much. The squad is indeed stronger particularly with the introduction of Torres, but by no means to the degree some are indicating (as I've said many times it was strong enough to launch a title push last season as well). The reality is though, even if you replace like with like ability wise, (and Alonso and Masherano would appear to be a perfect example) you still weaken the team by constantly doing so as the other players don't get chance to form a cohesive alliance with that player.
I'm very concerned firstly that we will convince ourselves that selectorial silliness is Ok again by virtue of the fact that we are able to beat substandard teams with what amounts to our reserve eleven. I also hope that the fact that we aren't using these "warm-up" fixtures against the lesser lights to prepare for the bigger battles to come won't come back to haunt us. Sensible rotation is OK (and with Gerrard and Carragher both being out, that's pretty much enough rotating for me TBH) but please no tinkering.
We need to remember that though swapping like for like sounds OK in theory, it won't work. Footballers come in individual packages, but together they form a team. Ultimately, it's the best one of those which will win the league, and not a bunch of rested individuals.
redtrader74 wrote:I'm worried too, i'm worried that people on here think that all losses are down to rotation. Change a player or two and THATS why we lost, the opposition can't have played better, the tactics can't be wrong, the players didn't play like three legged dogs, no it was rotation.
I really don't think Rafa is being given the credit that he deserves, the last 3 years have been about getting to where we are, a true contender for the League. Those years have been about creating a squad that can be rotated, about the players understanding and playing the way Rafa wants to.
ROTATION WILL HAPPEN, Rafa has said that players will play 30-40 games, well work it out if the main 22 players play anywhere near that, they will have to be rotated.
Tolouse and Derby(not won that one yet!) are poor, well so were Sheffield Utd and Haifa, and rotation was blamed for the poor performances then, and yet this Year it didn't matter because we won / will win![]()
I must have a bad memory so please can those that talk of 7-8-9 changes between the Prem matches last Year please explain when that happened, so we can lay that one to rest, i can't think of more than 5 unforced changes.
I am also confused with Micks point on not believing the sqauds as strong as some think, and yet thought it was strong enough to win the Prem last Year and believe its stronger now??
'I'm annoyed when he tinkers for no need'
that statement is laughable. Someone actually believes Rafa does that. You may not believe it but Rafa will have reasons why he rotates, some he may reveal to us and others he won't, but the ultimate reason will be to win the match, and if you don't believe that, and think he does it for the sake of it, then call for his dismissal.
This play your best 11 notion is so simplistic, if it was that easy the top managers wouldn't be so sought after, anyone of us could do it. Play your best 11, well what is it?? check out these boards, some will argue it should be Carra and Hyypia, others Carra and Agger. Some will say Gerrard and Alonso, Alonso and Masher, Masher and Gerrard. Or Torres and Kuyt, Torres and Voronin, Torres and Crouch. There are many more. We haven't really got a best 11, we have got what Rafa wants, a sqaud that has different qualities where the team picked is sufficient to beat what it faces.
Personally i wanted us to be more attacking and that has been the case so far this season, rotation should not fail as some suggest due to a lack of cohesivness, because the players play and train with each far more each day, than when playing matches, so the cohesion should be there, and the majority have been together for a while now.
IMHO i will get a true gauge of our seasons potential after 10-12 games, but the funny thing is the vehement 'anti-rotationalists' (you know who you are!) have already started taking the edge off their comments.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 65 guests