LFC2007 wrote:Well it's funny how when I make a point you're the one to respond, but when Mick and the established members make a point you're happy to let it go.
Of course there's a bias towards established members, a clique would be one way of describing it.
Whenever I make a point that you agree with you would never post, whenever there's a point I make you disagree with you're more than happy to jump in and go on one of your rants. Just like you wanted to prove the positive effects of smoking so much that you took essays off the internet. In this debate you would never have taken up the argument with Feeney, you let it go, but with me - you couldn't help yourself. Had it been Mick or one of the other founding fathers disagreeing, I really don't think you would have gone on such a rant.
So yes, there is a type of clique on this forum.
I had to defend Dawsons pro-smoking stance. After all I am in Dawson's clique

