Lionheart wrote:Harry did OK...but only OK. He certainly looked slow at times and some of his crosses were loops into the playing area as opposed to a decisive direct pass. The one thing he did do well was to keep the ball (a valuable asset in a match against a team such as Uruguay). But having said that, I don't think Kewell will start in the Sydney game. I think Hiddink will give him maximum time time to recover and bring him on late in the game maybe as a game breaker...if things are tight. He has the skill to run at players...
I disagree with El Stinger's perceptions re. Viduka. I thought Viduka had a very good game. He was a target and showed for the ball. Archie Thompson (the only non-european playing player in the Aussie squad) was a revelation and a thorn in the Uraguay defence in the first half. He would also prove to be an asset toward the end of the game in Sydney. Aloisi will start beside Viduka in the Sydney leg.
C'mon Aussie!!!!
Most Aussies tend to think that Viduka is some sort of God and even SBS gives him too much tv time.
that! His record speaks for itself, NOT GOOD ENOUGH! 6 goals in 32 matches?? And all Aussies think he is such a great player, mate, get over it. Harry at 15% is 10 times better than a fully fit Viduka. Please. Enough. Viduka is sh1t, get it through your heads. He should never be captain, Im sure if Harry was fully fit, he would have the arm band. Viduka Sucks, nuff said.







