s@int wrote:john craig wrote:Ace Ventura wrote:john craig wrote:I think it's easy to forget that Benitez has made us the team we are in Europe. He has raised the profile of the club and also helped the club financially by doing so well in Europe. He gets crucified for his 'net spend' but he has made a lot of that money himself by outsmarting far better teams than us in Europe over recent seasons.
Because of this raised profile we have been able to attract players like Torres and Mascherano. Do you think Torres would have signed if we weren't such a force in the Champions League? No way.
Given then that Benitez has given us the platform to compete for the CL and the league for that matter, does he not deserve to see his project through? Not necessarily my own opinion, but is another way of looking at it.
Its a very good point John, i am certain that before Rafa and all the success in the champions league the likes of Torres and Mascherano probably wouldnt of signed, definately not Torres who had turned down Chelsea.
What we have to look at from my point of view is, if we keep Rafa can we get back to the top of our own tree (the league) ?
The answer for me is a definate no, so (if we get the ownership sorted) then regardless of winning the champions league i would advocate a new start.
Fair points.
I would argue that no manager could come in and win the league for us without significant investment in the playing staff. And I'm not talking about a big 'net spend' over 5 years. I'm talking about 2, if not 3 20 million pound players in key positions - ie striker and right mid definitely and then either a full back or left mid - to come in in one transfer window.
Look at our team man for man against United's and how the feck can any of us really expect to win the league.
The idea of a TEAM IS THAT THE SUM IS GREATER THAN THE INDIVIDUAL PARTS. If you use a revolving door transfer policy you will never achieve that (maybe a brilliant man manager could)
The Forest team that won the league and 2 European cups wasn't a great side had few great players yet swept all before it for a couple of years. How many of their players would have got in the Liverpool team 1 possibly 2 ?
The Blackburn team that won the league under Kenny, how many would have got in the Mancs team ?
A managers job is MORE than buying more expensive players than your rivals, its blending them in such a way that the sum of the TEAM is greater than the parts.
Great managers achieve this, other managers ask for more money.
I'd argue s@int that our team is greater than the sum of its parts. With our current set of players I don't think we'd do any better with a different manager to be perfectly honest. You could argue though that our manager has had five years to build this side and if the players aren't good enough that's his fault. That's another debate. We have only two genuine world class players yet hung onto United's coat tails for much of the season and consistently get to the latter stages of the CL.
Comparisons with the Forest sides and the Blackburn side are pointless imo. Football in England has moved on a lot since then. The English top flight and the European cup are harder to win now. There is not such an even distribution of footballing talent throughout Europe now, it is now all concentrated in the Premiership and La Liga, and now less so in Italy and Germany. Winning the competition is now beyond French and Dutch teams and probably anyone else for that matter. The top teams in the Premiership and in Europe are now stronger than the top teams were 10 or 20 years ago.
You can't rely on a team simply being more than the sum of its parts these days to win a league. A knock-out such as the CL maybe - Benitez with Liverpool and Mourinho with Porto proved that. But a league? I'm sorry but for me you need world class or at least top class players in most positions to win the Premiership these days. We don't have that and it doesn't matter who the manager is he wouldn't win the league with our current squad.