Liverpool FC Forum

by **Greavesie** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 5:45 pm

this is turning into a pretty good story to be fair

by **dawson99** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 5:46 pm

It's like West Side Story, me and Woof are the Jets, you lot are... the anthill mob LOL

by **Madmax** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 5:48 pm

lol hell yeah it is... we have childish jokes, darth vadar and codes similar to lost... what more could we ask for

by **maypaxvobiscum** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 5:57 pm

speaking of f'uck...it has a proper term right? i was told it stands for '' For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge''

by **dawson99** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 5:57 pm

for unlawful carnal knowledge you

by **SupitsJonF** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:00 pm

dawson99 wrote:jon, my thread on new shows is awesome, its informative and entertaining... it has a reason and a purpose. this thread has no talent.
If you are gonna write a story, do a page each, 500 words each, get a synopsis, characters, plots.. things like that. not dildo shop repetitions from years ago

do think though that my song association thread should be locked as well, that has more than run it's course.

I think this thread is also kind of silly, read the posts and see I havn't offered anything useful

. I just don't think it deserves the beating it is getting from everyone on their high horses.

And about your thread, in your opinion the new show thread is awesome. The thread itself is no entertaining, as the shows don't exist in your thread, it is only informative. Something a TV guide or the front page of yahoo tv could give you. However I also think watching too much tv just makes people boring and brain dead.

How come I never mentioned any of this, although I disagreed with it, in your thread? Oh yeah, im not a cun.t

by **maypaxvobiscum** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:01 pm

Fornication Under Consent of the King

by **supersub** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:03 pm

maypaxvobiscum wrote:speaking of f'uck...it has a proper term right? i was told it stands for '' For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge''

by **dawson99** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:04 pm

SupitsJonF wrote:
dawson99 wrote:jon, my thread on new shows is awesome, its informative and entertaining... it has a reason and a purpose. this thread has no talent.
If you are gonna write a story, do a page each, 500 words each, get a synopsis, characters, plots.. things like that. not dildo shop repetitions from years ago

do think though that my song association thread should be locked as well, that has more than run it's course.

I think this thread is also kind of silly, read the posts and see I havn't offered anything useful . I just don't think it deserves the beating it is getting from everyone on their high horses.

And about your thread, in your opinion the new show thread is awesome. The thread itself is no entertaining, as the shows don't exist in your thread, it is only informative. Something a TV guide or the front page of yahoo tv could give you. However I also think watching too much tv just makes people boring and brain dead.

How come I never mentioned any of this, although I disagreed with it, in your thread? Oh yeah, im not a cun.t

oh yes you are

Sorry lol.

The shows thread is completely different. It is more than a tv guide as it shows what is coming up, and gives a better description, informing other posters what to expect.
This thread is simlar to when I was 10 and I threw poo at someone and called them a pooface... funny at the time, but nothing to write home about...

oh, ps - I saw what you did there, by saying that you are no c.nut, you are in fact calling woof a c.nut... just not directly to him.

This thread is getting better now tho, as its not about the story

by **Greavesie** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:04 pm

bit of a dramatic story actually, time to lock?

by **maypaxvobiscum** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:06 pm

Greavesie wrote:bit of a dramatic story actually, time to lock?

In ancient England single people could not have sex unless they had consent of the king. When people wanted to have a baby, they had to get the consent of the king, and the king gave them a placard that they hung on their door while they were having sex. The placard had F. U. C. K. (Fornication Under Consent of the King) on it. Hence that's where the word :censored:

came from.

by **Greavesie** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:09 pm

maypaxvobiscum wrote:
Greavesie wrote:bit of a dramatic story actually, time to lock?

In ancient England single people could not have sex unless they had consent of the king. When people wanted to have a baby, they had to get the consent of the king, and the king gave them a placard that they hung on their door while they were having sex. The placard had F. U. C. K. (Fornication Under Consent of the King) on it. Hence that's where the word came from.

by **Madmax** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:10 pm

maypaxvobiscum wrote:
Greavesie wrote:bit of a dramatic story actually, time to lock?

In ancient England single people could not have sex unless they had consent of the king. When people wanted to have a baby, they had to get the consent of the king, and the king gave them a placard that they hung on their door while they were having sex. The placard had F. U. C. K. (Fornication Under Consent of the King) on it. Hence that's where the word came from.

thanks for the info mate

I actually was'nt aware of that.. good to know now..

by **maypaxvobiscum** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:11 pm

Google is God

by **Greavesie** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:13 pm

maypaxvobiscum wrote: Google is God

theres a few others who hold the same opinion mate......

Liverpool FC Forum

Lets write a story... - Back by popular pm demand

Who is online