Conspiracy theories - Which do you believe

Please use this forum for general Non-Football related chat

Postby metalhead » Mon May 05, 2008 9:57 pm

Emerald Red wrote:
The Manhattan Project wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
The Manhattan Project wrote:The "moon landings were a conspiracy" theories are so absurdly elaborate and complicated, it would have been simpler to just build a rocket and go to the Moon.

Maybe that's the point. Maybe it was impossible to get there, and still is. The science, or scientific fact, contradicts them even being there.

No it doesn't.

Science backs up the moon landings on every single point.


The conspiracy theories relating to the moon landings are completely baseless and have been easily debunked time and time again.

Sure they have.

What about the Van Allen radiation belts? If they're real as dangerous as what scientists say, wouldn't it be impossible for a rocket with people in it to pass through them without serious consequences? I'm a bit hazy with what I learned in science class, but doesn't it require several inches of lead to block those rays? Those space suits hardly looked up to blocking out any radiation at all.

Why haven't we been back since?

Isnt what nano technology is used for then? to block those rays?
ImageImageImage
User avatar
metalhead
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 17474
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Milan, Italy

Postby The Manhattan Project » Mon May 05, 2008 10:53 pm

Sure they have.


Yes they have.

Conspiracy theorists merely run through a repetitive list of supposed "problems". The explanations which debunk these conspiracies are simply ignored by those with a paranoid mindset.


What about the Van Allen radiation belts? If they're real as dangerous as what scientists say, wouldn't it be impossible for a rocket with people in it to pass through them without serious consequences? I'm a bit hazy with what I learned in science class, but doesn't it require several inches of lead to block those rays? Those space suits hardly looked up to blocking out any radiation at all.


Van Allen

Why haven't we been back since?


The most obvious answer is that the goal of the Apollo program had been completed and Kennedy's promise had been fulfilled. They had beaten the Soviets to the Moon and NASA's budget was slashed. NASA also needed the funds to go forward with Skylab.

Anyway, we are in fact going back to the Moon in the near future:


Constellation
china syndrome 80512640 reactor meltdown fusion element
no uniquely indefinable one 5918 identification unknown 113
source transmission 421 general panic hysteria 02 outbreak
foreign mutation 001505 maximum code destruction nuclear
reflection 01044 power plutonium helix atomic energy wave
User avatar
The Manhattan Project
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 5416
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 7:22 am
Location: Reactor Number Four

Postby 7_Kewell » Mon May 05, 2008 11:16 pm

Emerald Red wrote:
The Manhattan Project wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
The Manhattan Project wrote:The "moon landings were a  conspiracy" theories are so absurdly elaborate and complicated, it would have been simpler to just build a rocket and go to the Moon.

Maybe that's the point. Maybe it was impossible to get there, and still is. The science, or scientific fact, contradicts them even being there.

No it doesn't.

Science backs up the moon landings on every single point.


The conspiracy theories relating to the moon landings are completely baseless and have been easily debunked time and time again.

Sure they have.

What about the Van Allen radiation belts? If they're real as dangerous as what scientists say, wouldn't it be impossible for a rocket with people in it to pass through them without serious consequences? I'm a bit hazy with what I learned in science class, but doesn't it require several inches of lead to block those rays? Those space suits hardly looked up to blocking out any radiation at all.

Why haven't we been back since?

there are missions planned by Nasa and some other countries to return in the future. Why did they stop?  Because it was costing shed loads of cash and the US public were losing interest in it.  Also the need to spend the money elsewhere (Star Wars Program) probably put the last nail into it. 

I find conspiracy theories to be utter nonsense...the claims that the WTC was attacked by the US is a prime example.  Some nut in the US was claiming that all the passengers of the planes which crashed weren't dead!  He said they all landed and the people were being held somewhere against their will  ???
“You cannot transfer the heart and soul of Liverpool Football Club, although I am sure there are many clubs who would like to buy it.”
User avatar
7_Kewell
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13389
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 11:04 pm
Location: Here, there, everywhere

Postby Emerald Red » Tue May 06, 2008 3:02 am

The Manhattan Project wrote:
Sure they have.


Yes they have.

Conspiracy theorists merely run through a repetitive list of supposed "problems". The explanations which debunk these conspiracies are simply ignored by those with a paranoid mindset.


What about the Van Allen radiation belts? If they're real as dangerous as what scientists say, wouldn't it be impossible for a rocket with people in it to pass through them without serious consequences? I'm a bit hazy with what I learned in science class, but doesn't it require several inches of lead to block those rays? Those space suits hardly looked up to blocking out any radiation at all.


Van Allen

Why haven't we been back since?


The most obvious answer is that the goal of the Apollo program had been completed and Kennedy's promise had been fulfilled. They had beaten the Soviets to the Moon and NASA's budget was slashed. NASA also needed the funds to go forward with Skylab.

Anyway, we are in fact going back to the Moon in the near future:


Constellation

Well, that's that cleared up then.


As for them going back in the near future, not in my life time.

I wonder - is the Moon owned by anyone? Do the US have rights to it seeing the claim to have gotten there first?
Image
User avatar
Emerald Red
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7289
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:22 pm
Location: Ireland

Postby NiftyNeil » Tue May 06, 2008 8:34 am

I was always one for buying into the conspiracy theories. I always believed that Kennedy was shot by the CIA, that the moon landings were fake, Maralyn Monroe was murdered, Elvis is alive and working in a chippie in Brighton etc etc. But as time has gone by, surely not everyone could keep the secrets for that long. The ammount of people that were suspected to be in on the Kennedy assasination couldn't keep quiet for that long. Someone would of revealed all on their deathbeds, surely. Someone would of had an urge to reveal all before they popped their clogs.
As for the moon landings, the race was so great with Russia, if i was fake, Russia would of been tracking everything via satellite, they would of known. The British at Jodrell Bank would of been tracking it too, they would of known if it had been faked.
Conspiracy theories are pure fantasy made up by people who can't/won't accept the truth - see Mohamed al Fayed as an example.
Image
User avatar
NiftyNeil
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 1961
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:40 am
Location: Widnes

Postby The Manhattan Project » Tue May 06, 2008 3:21 pm

Emerald Red wrote:
The Manhattan Project wrote:
Sure they have.


Yes they have.

Conspiracy theorists merely run through a repetitive list of supposed "problems". The explanations which debunk these conspiracies are simply ignored by those with a paranoid mindset.


What about the Van Allen radiation belts? If they're real as dangerous as what scientists say, wouldn't it be impossible for a rocket with people in it to pass through them without serious consequences? I'm a bit hazy with what I learned in science class, but doesn't it require several inches of lead to block those rays? Those space suits hardly looked up to blocking out any radiation at all.


Van Allen

Why haven't we been back since?


The most obvious answer is that the goal of the Apollo program had been completed and Kennedy's promise had been fulfilled. They had beaten the Soviets to the Moon and NASA's budget was slashed. NASA also needed the funds to go forward with Skylab.

Anyway, we are in fact going back to the Moon in the near future:


Constellation

Well, that's that cleared up then.


As for them going back in the near future, not in my life time.

I wonder - is the Moon owned by anyone? Do the US have rights to it seeing the claim to have gotten there first?

1- Not in your lifetime? It's only twelve years. I'm sure you'll still be around, barring disaster.

2- The Outer Space Treaty prohibits all governments from claiming the Moon or any other moon or planet in the Solar System. Techically the Sun, the planets, dwarf planets, asteroids, comets, and moons in the Solar System collectively belong to the Human race as a whole.
china syndrome 80512640 reactor meltdown fusion element
no uniquely indefinable one 5918 identification unknown 113
source transmission 421 general panic hysteria 02 outbreak
foreign mutation 001505 maximum code destruction nuclear
reflection 01044 power plutonium helix atomic energy wave
User avatar
The Manhattan Project
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 5416
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 7:22 am
Location: Reactor Number Four

Postby account deleted by request » Tue May 06, 2008 3:26 pm

I am pretty sure Manhatten has been hired by NASA to help promote the idea that the moon landings actually happened. Its all part of the conspiracy :D
account deleted by request
 
Posts: 20690
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:11 am

Postby Sabre » Tue May 06, 2008 3:37 pm

2- The Outer Space Treaty prohibits all governments from claiming the Moon or any other moon or planet in the Solar System. Techically the Sun, the planets, dwarf planets, asteroids, comets, and moons in the Solar System collectively belong to the Human race as a whole.


We own the sun?

He, it will be irony when one of our posessions gets big and burn the oceans and the whole planet :D
Image
SOS member #1499

Drummerphil, never forgotten.
User avatar
Sabre
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13178
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:10 am
Location: San Sebastian (Spain)

Postby JoeTerp » Tue May 06, 2008 3:41 pm

Emerald Red wrote:
Sabre wrote:3.- Americans wouldn't be as dumb as to make that mistake and it could have been easy for them to add stars in a fake film.

You think?

The general population of America couldn't even tell you where Iraq is on a map, and think England is a place in London.  :p

I dare you to find Kentucky on a map
Image
User avatar
JoeTerp
 
Posts: 5191
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:38 am
Location: Boston, MA

Postby JoeTerp » Tue May 06, 2008 3:44 pm

they brought back moon rocks that are waaaay older than the rocks found on earth
Image
User avatar
JoeTerp
 
Posts: 5191
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:38 am
Location: Boston, MA

Postby Sabre » Tue May 06, 2008 3:45 pm

JoeTerp wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
Sabre wrote:3.- Americans wouldn't be as dumb as to make that mistake and it could have been easy for them to add stars in a fake film.

You think?

The general population of America couldn't even tell you where Iraq is on a map, and think England is a place in London.  :p

I dare you to find Kentucky on a map

I don't know well where Wisconsin and Wyoming and Ohio are. And for what is worth, when I studied where the countries were placed, a massive thing called USSR was easy to learn -- I'm not sure I'd know to place the new independent republics.

We Europeans, always boast about our culture, but the other day some Spanish youngsters were asked in the tv about our civil war, geography questions, and politic questions, and I really was embarrassed. We don't seem to import only McDonalds and Nike and Coke, we also import not reading, videogame education, and dumbness.

My point? we'd rather be more humble and not boast too much about American's supposed lack of culture.
Image
SOS member #1499

Drummerphil, never forgotten.
User avatar
Sabre
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13178
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:10 am
Location: San Sebastian (Spain)

Postby Emerald Red » Tue May 06, 2008 3:46 pm

NiftyNeil wrote:I was always one for buying into the conspiracy theories. I always believed that Kennedy was shot by the CIA, that the moon landings were fake, Maralyn Monroe was murdered, Elvis is alive and working in a chippie in Brighton etc etc. But as time has gone by, surely not everyone could keep the secrets for that long. The ammount of people that were suspected to be in on the Kennedy assasination couldn't keep quiet for that long. Someone would of revealed all on their deathbeds, surely. Someone would of had an urge to reveal all before they popped their clogs.
As for the moon landings, the race was so great with Russia, if i was fake, Russia would of been tracking everything via satellite, they would of known. The British at Jodrell Bank would of been tracking it too, they would of known if it had been faked.
Conspiracy theories are pure fantasy made up by people who can't/won't accept the truth - see Mohamed al Fayed as an example.

So you reckon there's never been any lies told by governments world wide through history? They haven't killed people, or staged things for their own agenda then lied about it? That's a bit naive, isn't it? People lie all the time. And people also can take their lies to the grave with them. it's easy.

JFK was plugged by his own government. Let's not forget Robert as well. I don't care if people say that's a conspiracy and that it's bollox. It's my belief. The video evidence speaks for itself. If they say he was shot from the back, why is the back of his head flying off, and why did the so called assassin get stiffed himself?
Image
User avatar
Emerald Red
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7289
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:22 pm
Location: Ireland

Postby Emerald Red » Tue May 06, 2008 3:49 pm

JoeTerp wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
Sabre wrote:3.- Americans wouldn't be as dumb as to make that mistake and it could have been easy for them to add stars in a fake film.

You think?

The general population of America couldn't even tell you where Iraq is on a map, and think England is a place in London.  :p

I dare you to find Kentucky on a map

I have a general idea, Joe. It's in the country that is the United States of America.  :D

Na, just off the top of my head, it's south east, down round Alabama or NC, Viriginia or there abouts. Am I right?
Image
User avatar
Emerald Red
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7289
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:22 pm
Location: Ireland

Postby Bad Bob » Tue May 06, 2008 4:15 pm

Sabre wrote:
JoeTerp wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
Sabre wrote:3.- Americans wouldn't be as dumb as to make that mistake and it could have been easy for them to add stars in a fake film.

You think?

The general population of America couldn't even tell you where Iraq is on a map, and think England is a place in London.  :p

I dare you to find Kentucky on a map

I don't know well where Wisconsin and Wyoming and Ohio are. And for what is worth, when I studied where the countries were placed, a massive thing called USSR was easy to learn -- I'm not sure I'd know to place the new independent republics.

We Europeans, always boast about our culture, but the other day some Spanish youngsters were asked in the tv about our civil war, geography questions, and politic questions, and I really was embarrassed. We don't seem to import only McDonalds and Nike and Coke, we also import not reading, videogame education, and dumbness.

My point? we'd rather be more humble and not boast too much about American's supposed lack of culture.

Wisconsin...a fantastic state ideal for lovers of beer, cheese, bratwurst and fit farm girls! :nod

Wyoming...a beautiful but remote western landscape where pick-up trucks out-number people 2 to 1. :D

Ohio...an uptight, lily-white, uber-Christian borescape full of sh!t-ugly McMansions surrounded by white picket fences.  Sadly home to several relatives of mine and thus a congregation site for many excruciating family functions.  :no
Image
User avatar
Bad Bob
LFC Guru Member
 
Posts: 11269
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:03 pm
Location: Canada

Postby The Manhattan Project » Tue May 06, 2008 4:17 pm

The video evidence speaks for itself. If they say he was shot from the back, why is the back of his head flying off, and why did the so called assassin get stiffed himself?


Head Movement

As for Jack Ruby, he was well known as being a hothead and nutter who always carried a gun with him. He said he simply shot Oswald when the opportunity arose. If the US government supposedly assassinated their own president, they could have chosen any number of more reliable and capable professional hitmen to take out Oswald, rather than depending on Jack Ruby, the violent and volitile son of a Russian Army deserter.

JFK was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald, who, like Mark Chapman (who murdered John Lennon) was a small and insignficant man who wanted to be recognised for something. Killing a famous person immediately gives the murderer eternal fame because they will always be linked to the person they killed.
china syndrome 80512640 reactor meltdown fusion element
no uniquely indefinable one 5918 identification unknown 113
source transmission 421 general panic hysteria 02 outbreak
foreign mutation 001505 maximum code destruction nuclear
reflection 01044 power plutonium helix atomic energy wave
User avatar
The Manhattan Project
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 5416
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 7:22 am
Location: Reactor Number Four

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat Forum

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests