Lando_Griffin wrote:That aliens landed at "AREA 57!!!!!" and yet they've managed to cover it up all these years.
So thats how they have kept it secret all these years, everyones been watching Area 51 for aliens and it was Area57 all along

Lando_Griffin wrote:That aliens landed at "AREA 57!!!!!" and yet they've managed to cover it up all these years.
s@int wrote:Lando_Griffin wrote:That aliens landed at "AREA 57!!!!!" and yet they've managed to cover it up all these years.
So thats how they have kept it secret all these years, everyones been watching Area 51 for aliens and it was Area57 all along
Lando_Griffin wrote:Emerald Red wrote:Lando_Griffin wrote:Conspiracy theories are for the weak minded who just cannot accept that sh*t happens.
Well, some sh*t happens for a reason, Lando. There's always a reason. And when that reason has doubt, then you invariably get suspicion. That would be like finding a dead body and walking past it and saying "ah, well - sh*t happens". There is nothing wrong with having a mind of your own, other than believe what the media spoon feeds you. You're a football and Liverpool supporter. You should at least know this.
I don't listen to the media at all - I don't tend to read the papers, and the only info on things I tend to be a*sed with is the initial reports on the news.
But I have to say it's idiotic to think:
That the Yank government/senate/whoever ordered the assassination of John Lennon. As big a pr*ck as the bloke was, there were plenty of other people doing more to disrupt the US than that long haired hippy gimp.
That the Senate/Pentagon ordered the assassination of JFK. What a load of old rubbish.
That aliens landed at "AREA 57!!!!!" and yet they've managed to cover it up all these years.
That the moon landings were fake. Do you ACTUALLY think that the Russians would have kept quiet had they found that they were infact the first nation to reach the place? And further to that - do you truly believe they wouldn't have checked?
That Bush/his crones ordered the Twin towers disaster to propagate the war on Iraq. I find that deeply insulting to the man, and beyond sick. Think about what this ridiculous notion implies.
Any more? Probably... But then - they'll all be a pile of W*nk aswell.
But I have to say it's idiotic to think:
That the Yank government/senate/whoever ordered the assassination of John Lennon. As big a pr*ck as the bloke was, there were plenty of other people doing more to disrupt the US than that long haired hippy gimp.
That the Senate/Pentagon ordered the assassination of JFK. What a load of old rubbish.
That aliens landed at "AREA 57!!!!!" and yet they've managed to cover it up all these years.
That the moon landings were fake. Do you ACTUALLY think that the Russians would have kept quiet had they found that they were infact the first nation to reach the place? And further to that - do you truly believe they wouldn't have checked?
That Bush/his crones ordered the Twin towers disaster to propagate the war on Iraq. I find that deeply insulting to the man, and beyond sick. Think about what this ridiculous notion implies.
Any more? Probably... But then - they'll all be a pile of W*nk aswell.
Emerald Red wrote:No arguments here. I agree. Bush is an idiot. But a smarter man than people give him credit for. If you watched the man speak 10 years ago in congress, he certainly sounded like a man who knew his sh*t and knew what he was talking about. He was a brilliant mediator. I don't know what happened to him.
LFC2007 wrote:Emerald Red wrote:No arguments here. I agree. Bush is an idiot. But a smarter man than people give him credit for. If you watched the man speak 10 years ago in congress, he certainly sounded like a man who knew his sh*t and knew what he was talking about. He was a brilliant mediator. I don't know what happened to him.
He's always been a tool, I remember seeing interviews with him 10 years ago, he's never been particularly bright and never will be. He certainly has intelligent people who surround him though. He's never sounded like a man who knew his sh!t. He's thick, but has good advisors and strong faith in his views, that's all.
Emerald Red wrote:LFC2007 wrote:Emerald Red wrote:No arguments here. I agree. Bush is an idiot. But a smarter man than people give him credit for. If you watched the man speak 10 years ago in congress, he certainly sounded like a man who knew his sh*t and knew what he was talking about. He was a brilliant mediator. I don't know what happened to him.
He's always been a tool, I remember seeing interviews with him 10 years ago, he's never been particularly bright and never will be. He certainly has intelligent people who surround him though. He's never sounded like a man who knew his sh!t. He's thick, but has good advisors and strong faith in his views, that's all.
If you seen the speech I seen him give to the senate, you'd have a different view. I don't know how long ago it was, but it looked as if it was the early 90's.
Take a look...
Bush
I seen one even before this. The man could talk and speak his own mind and answer questions with clarity when put to the sword, and all without pre-written notes.
But, yeah, he was a tool then, and is a tool now.
LFC2007 wrote:Emerald Red wrote:LFC2007 wrote:Emerald Red wrote:No arguments here. I agree. Bush is an idiot. But a smarter man than people give him credit for. If you watched the man speak 10 years ago in congress, he certainly sounded like a man who knew his sh*t and knew what he was talking about. He was a brilliant mediator. I don't know what happened to him.
He's always been a tool, I remember seeing interviews with him 10 years ago, he's never been particularly bright and never will be. He certainly has intelligent people who surround him though. He's never sounded like a man who knew his sh!t. He's thick, but has good advisors and strong faith in his views, that's all.
If you seen the speech I seen him give to the senate, you'd have a different view. I don't know how long ago it was, but it looked as if it was the early 90's.
Take a look...
Bush
I seen one even before this. The man could talk and speak his own mind and answer questions with clarity when put to the sword, and all without pre-written notes.
But, yeah, he was a tool then, and is a tool now.
I've just watched it, it proves nothing to support the view that he knew his sh!t. He was well prepped by his advisors, you can see that by the way he speaks, and the structure of the speech in general.
He is stating his beliefs in that speech, any well prepped muppet can do that. He's confident and has revised the speech well.
The clarity of his speech making may have deteriorated with age, bear in mind that speech was from a time when he was not President, he had to be on the ball in terms of preparation if he was going to come anywhere near winning an election.
Emerald Red wrote:Well, either way, at least he could talk and answer questions without blabbering bollox. If an idiot is in charge of America, and has been this past 8 years, then it makes you wonder how he got voted in and how he's been there for so long. What do you think?
LFC2007 wrote:Emerald Red wrote:Well, either way, at least he could talk and answer questions without blabbering bollox. If an idiot is in charge of America, and has been this past 8 years, then it makes you wonder how he got voted in and how he's been there for so long. What do you think?
America have a thing for numpties - especially in recent times, Schwarzenegger managed to become Governor of California FFS!
Another example of someone, who without serious financial backing, and intelligent advisors would fall flat on his face.
In America, the pre-requisite for being a politician doesn't include being bright. It requires serious financial backing, quality advisors, and an immense confidence in your beliefs.
If anything it makes you wonder what the feck the electorate are thinking.
Emerald Red wrote:So who would you say is running the show, then? Is it Bush, or is it someone else?
The Manhattan Project wrote:People like George Bush and the T-101 cyborg running California aren't really the "president" or the "governor". I think guys like that are simply the public face of whichever group actually runs the country or state. For example, it's easier to get Arnie elected because he can work the crowds and the people of the state find him appealing because he's a huge star. But no one can seriously believe that this Austrian dummy is actually devising policy. I would say the same thing happened with Ronald Reagan. He was a great talker who could capture the attention of the people, but in reality he was little more than the spokesperson for the real policy makers behind the scenes who were really running the country.
Emerald Red wrote:The Manhattan Project wrote:People like George Bush and the T-101 cyborg running California aren't really the "president" or the "governor". I think guys like that are simply the public face of whichever group actually runs the country or state. For example, it's easier to get Arnie elected because he can work the crowds and the people of the state find him appealing because he's a huge star. But no one can seriously believe that this Austrian dummy is actually devising policy. I would say the same thing happened with Ronald Reagan. He was a great talker who could capture the attention of the people, but in reality he was little more than the spokesperson for the real policy makers behind the scenes who were really running the country.
Sounds like a conspiracy on it's own. You aren't suggesting that Shadow Governments exist within, are you, Manhattan? And that Bush and his administration are nothing but a veneer or puppets?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests