kazza » Sun Nov 09, 2025 5:49 pm wrote:I just saw that Micheal Oliver is VAR official
Not blaming the ref or var for our gutless display today.
kazza » Sun Nov 09, 2025 5:49 pm wrote:I just saw that Micheal Oliver is VAR official
damjan193 » Sun Nov 09, 2025 6:38 pm wrote:ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Sun Nov 09, 2025 8:32 pm wrote:2 of their 3 goals had an element of luck about them but lets face it the best team won, we weren't at the races today. Perhaps most worrying was our body language, the players looked like they were going through the motions to me.
What sort of body language do you expect our players to have with that sort of refereeing yakka? What sort of body language would any of us have in this situation? It's hard enough to play at the Etihad against City in normal terms, your spirits are bound to go down when you're playing against the refs as well. The players are only human too.
damjan193 » Sun Nov 09, 2025 10:54 pm wrote:Look we can fault the team for previous games like Man U, Brentford etc. for losing but this one just wasn't an example of us being poor this season. We're playing Man City at the Etihad, of course we're not going to look like prime Barcelona against them on their own ground. The game was decided by ref decisions not in line with any rule in the book. Some of you are acting as if momentum isn't a thing and as if poor decisions going against you not only affect the result but also the mental state of the players during the game. Had Virgil's perfectly good goal been given, as it should have been, people would have been singing a different tune right now I am certain.
ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Mon Nov 10, 2025 8:34 am wrote:damjan193 » Sun Nov 09, 2025 10:54 pm wrote:Look we can fault the team for previous games like Man U, Brentford etc. for losing but this one just wasn't an example of us being poor this season. We're playing Man City at the Etihad, of course we're not going to look like prime Barcelona against them on their own ground. The game was decided by ref decisions not in line with any rule in the book. Some of you are acting as if momentum isn't a thing and as if poor decisions going against you not only affect the result but also the mental state of the players during the game. Had Virgil's perfectly good goal been given, as it should have been, people would have been singing a different tune right now I am certain.
This City team are more than beatable mate, besides i don't think Virgil's goal was quite the robbery some are trying to make it out to be, it was a 50/50 shout that went against us no more than that.
Robbo was standing in an off-side position, that's just a fact, and although he didn't block or impair the keeper's view of the ball he must have caught the keepers eye given he had to duck to get out of the way of it. If Robbo wouldn't have ducked Virgil's header would have hit him so he must have been a factor in the keepers decision making process, he must have been. It was a tight call and on another day it might have went our way but in no way,shape or form was it a Diaz away at Tottenham job.
Blaming our cowardly performance on that header not being given is clutching at straws imo, right from the off all our passing moves went backwards, we looked absolutely terrified of them. Don't get me wrong anyone can lose a game of footy but there's ways to lose, go out on your shield don't capitulate like we did yesterday.
In truth that was the type of performance that gets managers the sack, that did not look like a group of players playing for their manager, i don't think he can afford many more of those
damjan193 wrote:Everyone and their dog said that it was a wrong call to disallow our goal including known haters of Liverpool. There's even montages on social media showing City scoring almost in the exact same circumstances but their goals stand. Even the penalty was ridiculously soft and that kunt Oliver was even looking for reasons to have it retaken. I really can't understand anyone saying the decisions were "50-50" when this is the umpteen time we've been at the receiving end of bad decisions with City and Michael Oliver.
After playing Real Madrid off the park just a few days prior I'm really surprised by some of the comments on here, calling the team spineless, gutless and what not, calling for Slot's head etc. Personally I saw signs of improvement against both Villa and Madrid and I'm definitely not changing my opinion because we lost against 12 players. At this point the league might be gone but Champions League there's all to play for.
red till i die!! » Mon Nov 10, 2025 4:39 pm wrote:damjan193 wrote:]
The referees aren't out to do us.
damjan193 » Mon Nov 10, 2025 1:23 pm wrote:Everyone and their dog said that it was a wrong call to disallow our goal including known haters of Liverpool. There's even montages on social media showing City scoring almost in the exact same circumstances but their goals stand. Even the penalty was ridiculously soft and that kunt Oliver was even looking for reasons to have it retaken. I really can't understand anyone saying the decisions were "50-50" when this is the umpteen time we've been at the receiving end of bad decisions with City and Michael Oliver.
After playing Real Madrid off the park just a few days prior I'm really surprised by some of the comments on here, calling the team spineless, gutless and what not, calling for Slot's head etc. Personally I saw signs of improvement against both Villa and Madrid and I'm definitely not changing my opinion because we lost against 12 players. At this point the league might be gone but Champions League there's all to play for.
Return to Liverpool FC - Games
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 116 guests