I find this hard to believe.
He signed a new deal on the 20th December, if a deal was struck in November then why put an increase in price release clause in. Barca paying 30+ million more all be it Suarez was getting 50 grand more a week?
We made it clear we didn't intend to sell (unless the release clause was met and we didn't get Champions League).
This sounds to me like the little sh!t is trying to pass the blame to Liverpool for the bite (because its never his fault) and get his ban reduced.
20th December 2013:
Luis Suarez has signed a new four-and-a-half-year contract with Liverpool.
The striker, 26, joined the Reds in January 2011 and has scored 17 goals in 11 Premier League starts this season.
Suarez, whose original deal was set to expire in 2016, will earn around £160,000 until the end of this season and then £200,000 per week over the final four years of the contract.
"I am delighted to have agreed a new deal with Liverpool and have my future secured for the long term," he said.
"I believe I can achieve the ambitions of winning trophies and playing at the very highest level with Liverpool. My aim is to help get us there as quickly as possible."
Wasn't getting a pay rise until the start of this season? doesn't sound like an "intended sale" or an "agreement in place" to me.