maguskwt wrote:We might have lost the PR battle, but can we at least try to raise the standard of spelling on the new kit forum?
Qwite wright to

maguskwt wrote:We might have lost the PR battle, but can we at least try to raise the standard of spelling on the new kit forum?
metalhead » Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:51 pm wrote:I see NESV are also adopting the sell to buy policy, case of de ja vu?
Benny The Noon » Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:31 pm wrote:metalhead » Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:51 pm wrote:I see NESV are also adopting the sell to buy policy, case of de ja vu?
Well that's not going to get us far.
metalhead » Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:53 pm wrote:Ben Smith was answering a question regarding LFC transfers on twitter, he said that we are looking to resolve the Carroll issue first before we buy, so I guess the sale of Carroll will determine our transfer.
It's a shame, other teams are investing heavily while we look to adopt the same policy tw!t & tw@t used to do, but without the debt.
damjan193 » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:28 pm wrote:metalhead » Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:53 pm wrote:Ben Smith was answering a question regarding LFC transfers on twitter, he said that we are looking to resolve the Carroll issue first before we buy, so I guess the sale of Carroll will determine our transfer.
It's a shame, other teams are investing heavily while we look to adopt the same policy tw!t & tw@t used to do, but without the debt.
If there is a "Carroll issue" then it's obvious we don't have him in our future plans.
metalhead » Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:51 pm wrote:I see NESV are also adopting the sell to buy policy, case of de ja vu?
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests