It's a nice article Igor, and an interesting point of view. Now given the title of the thread, imagine if the roles had been reversed and the thread was called "Why I think Rafa is fecking great" and I had posted up a similar article which held the opposite opinion to this one. People would have gone absolutely off their heads with rage, fecking unbelieveable what this place is coming to etc etc.
I'm very much of the view that everyone, and that means each and every one is entitled to not only have a view, but is entitled to express it as well (provided of course it's not some wind-up idiot who actually supports everton or the Mancs or something). That's what has got me this morning. It's not that people disagree with your view because of course you expect that. It's not that people argue the point because of course that's what it's all about. It's when people dispute your right to hold an opinion, it's when they don't attack the opinion but the fact that you chose to voice it in the first place. "Too much negative sh!t on this place", rather than "I'm going to explain why I disagree".
I start a thread about the squad after five years of the Rafalution and try and evaluate how good it is. People don't come on and say "now hang on, we haven't only got one striker. We've got four because I really do think N'Gog, Kuyt and Babel are top class strikers". They don't say "I think you are being very harsh on Arbeloa, I think he's a top class right back". They don't come back at Owzat and say "hang on, those stats don't indicate what you say they do/those stats are factually incorrect". No, they dispute the posters right to voice an opinion. Because it's too negative for their taste.
I've undertook to but out of the forum, and I'll stick to my pledge. It's a shame though that a whole portion of people, despite being in the overwhelming majority from what I can see simply cannot bring themselves to even tolerate a dissenting voice.