Liverpool FC Forum

by **taff** » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:22 pm

Banning someone on the internet is exactly like killing people in the army, in fact I heard the SAS train on chatrooms by unjustly banning people to get them used to the carnage of a reallife situation

by **Number 9** » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:27 pm

Fecking hell lads,its obvious Saint and Sabre,you are never gonna be lovers!

But Sabre raising Saints dead and buried issue then Saints retaliation with a paedo jibe??FFS lads come on,its all getting a little twisted!

You know its enough when me and even judge make a comment!lol
you'se are both better than that(well i thought)...just give eachother a wide berth for a while!

by **destro** » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:30 pm

The Cryptographic subsystem failed a mandatory algorithm self-test during bootstrap :;):

by **woof woof !** » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:31 pm

taff wrote:Banning someone on the internet is exactly like killing people in the army, in fact I heard the SAS train on chatrooms by unjustly banning people to get them used to the carnage of a reallife situation

Taff's right,

tests have shown that cards issued to chat room members have a similar effect to an exploding grenade .

by **SupitsJonF** » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:33 pm

andy_g wrote:
Judge wrote:i did not have a problem in the army, and/or i do not have a problem with shooting someone, if my government ordered it, providing it aint one of my family

but surely if you would be happy to shoot anyone your government told you to, you must believe them to be 100% correct in their decisions. this should include the orders to shoot your own family as well then shouldn't it?

what would you do if your government told you too jump in front of a bus?

But what government would order that? Englands forces I know wouldn't, and I can't see why they ever would. Soldiers follow orders because in battle situations, it tends to save their lives. If no one followed the orders and a fight broke out, it would be extremely dangerous as no one would be on the same page.

Now I can't really comment anymore than this, I'm not in the army. But my cousin is in the marines and I can say I know he isn't a mindless drone that will do anything for his country. He breaks the law more then anyone in the family

by **taff** » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:36 pm

woof woof ! wrote:
taff wrote:Banning someone on the internet is exactly like killing people in the army, in fact I heard the SAS train on chatrooms by unjustly banning people to get them used to the carnage of a reallife situation

Taff's right,

tests have shown that cards issued to chat room members have a similar effect to an exploding grenade .

I got banned from my mates Star Wars chatroom and it did ruin the frontroom

by **GYBS** » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:37 pm

Sheep ?? its called discipline and following orders when required to do so for the better of this country and those sheep your going on about enable you to sit on your :censored:

calling them sheep . i tell you what if more of this country and world had a bit more discipline then it wouldnt be as f ucked up as it is now . p isses me off when people mock the forces for them just doing their job.

by **andy_g** » Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:08 pm

"you soldier! shoot those protesting civilians will you??"

"yes, sir! right away, sir!"

by **account deleted by request** » Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:25 pm

Sabre you are so pathetic, you have at least given me my best laugh of the day.

You give the old saying about the organ grinder's monkey a whole new meaning

Ps When you are a Mod you can tell me what I can and can't talk or joke about, untill then :talktothehand

. Oh but you've already tried that job haven't you :laugh:

by **GYBS** » Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:39 pm

andy_g wrote:"you soldier! shoot those protesting civilians will you??"

"yes, sir! right away, sir!"

Grow up .

"You terrorist - blow up those totally innocent people "

"yes sir in the name of religion "

See the world is full of :censored:

idiots - but dont critize people who enable you to sit on your :censored:

pathetic

typing utter :censored:

by **NANNY RED** » Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:49 pm

Erm i came in here to say Welcome , Did someone rob the welcome mat for me to wipe me feet on cause it looks like ive slipped into a bit of a war zone :laugh:

by **Toffeehater** » Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:50 pm

After all has been said and done still we don't know why was the dude banned???

by **SupitsJonF** » Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:53 pm

NANNY RED wrote:Erm i came in here to say Welcome , Did someone rob the welcome mat for me to wipe me feet on cause it looks like ive slipped into a bit of a war zone

The guy we were supposed to be welcoming got banned, and now we are finding all the hidden internal problems newkit had all along but never reached the surface

by **GYBS** » Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:15 pm

When andy comes back hopefully he will answer these questions -

Did he mind us following orders when we were told to cover the fireman when they kept going on strike which enabled UK to have cover and helped saved lives

Did he mind us following orders when we helped the flood victims and once again saved lives ?

Does he mind us following orders to help counter act terrorism around the world saving lives ?

by **Sabre** » Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:32 pm

Number 9 wrote:Fecking hell lads,its obvious Saint and Sabre,you are never gonna be lovers!
But Sabre raising Saints dead and buried issue then Saints retaliation with a paedo jibe??FFS lads come on,its all getting a little twisted!

You know its enough when me and even judge make a comment!lol
you'se are both better than that(well i thought)...just give eachother a wide berth for a while!

Best moderator in this thread by a mile ::D . I'll take your advice, and hope that topic is truly died and buried as you describe.

The ignoring him part is easy, and it half worked the last weeks.

Liverpool FC Forum

The dude is in the building! - Peace n love y'all

Who is online