Lando_Griffin wrote:god_bless_john_houlding wrote:Lando_Griffin wrote:god_bless_john_houlding wrote:Lando I think you'll find Houllier's first FULL season was 98/99 not the 97/98 which was the season we finished 7th. It was after the time Evans/Houllier had shared the management.
Secondly, Ambrovich arrived at Chelsea at the start of the 03/04 season, when Houllier WAS our manager so it obviously was there while he was in charge. And if you cast your memory back far enough, you'll no doubt remember that the first game Ambrovich was owner of Chelsea was against Liverpool. Remember now? I'll make it even clearer for you, Veron (remember him ex Man United) scored the winner for Chelsea. OK?
I'll make it even clearer for YOU:
"Chelsea's financial dominance wasn't apparent whilst Houllier was in charge" - that doesn't mean Abramovic wasn't there - it means they hadn't yet become the force that won the title 2 years running.
OK?
Well the dominance was there, financially. As they spent millions upon millions upon millions under Ambrovich with Ranieri in charge.
Or to you, is it because they didn't win the league, therefore they didn't have the money they do now? The fact that they came 2nd that year obviously means that there wasn't any money backing him. eh?
So they finished 2nd the same year as us, now?![]()
I said their dominance wasn't apparent. It wasn't. They were not as strong, they were not as good.
Is it really that hard to understand?
We finished 2nd in 02/03 (the year before Ambrovich) Chelsea finished 2nd 03/04 (the first year Ambrovich was owner) is your knowledge on football that slim?