by stmichael » Mon May 24, 2004 1:01 pm
To me, Gerard Houllier's departure from Liverpoool is the result of two simple, but crucial factors - too many bad results and too many mediocre performances.
Houllier's final programme notes of the season hailed the "magnificent" achievement of his players to seal fourth place in the Premiership and entry into the Champions League.
I think this may have summed up that what Houllier thought was good enough for him was not good enough for Liverpool Football Club or its directors.
Houllier might have survived had Liverpool finished fourth, but in touching distance of the contenders - instead they were miles behind.
What Houllier thought was satisfactory was not satisfactory for a club like this.
And Houllier also had more difficult opponents to deal with as Liverpool fans started to turn against his methods in the latter stages of the season.
Managers are not sacked by a chairman and a chief executive, it is supporters who get them out of a job and there was no getting away from the fact that there was genuine disenchantment about the team's style.
The writing was on the wall when I attended the Easter Monday defeat against Charlton Athletic and tickets were on sale before a game - this is almost unheard of and a pointer to the fact that fans were disgruntled.
There was just too much mediocrity for the fans to accept.
Supporters may accept an unadventurous style of play if you are challenging for the major prizes, but Liverpool were not and some of the performances at Anfield, in particular, were desperate.
It's a dream job because you inherit world class players like Steven Gerrard
Liverpool's fans were becoming disillusioned and I think this played a massive part in the decision.
There were times when they could have been more adventurous and aggressive and it was hard to see Michael Owen stranded on his own up front at Anfield, of all places.
I also think the fact that Liverpool Football Club, one way or another, is about to have a massive cash injection of £60m, may also have played a part.
The next two or three signings will be crucial to the future of the club, and maybe the board were worried about Gerard's recent track record.
I always feel if you sign five players and three work out, that's a fair ratio. Too many of Liverpool's were not working out.
There is always an element of gamble when you buy big, for example I was one of many who thought the signing of Juan Sebastian Veron would ensure Manchester United regained the Champions League.
Wrong.
Houllier leaves Liverpool
There may have been a turning point in Gerard's reign in 2002, when he signed Salif Diao, Bruno Cheyrou and El-Hadji Diouf for a combined £20m.
None of those signings have worked, and no matter how big the club is, that outlay for little return cannot be sustained. It is a massive drain on resources.
Which brings us on to the subject of Houllier's successor and what awaits him at Anfield.
I've heard the talk it is between Charlton's Alan Curbishley and Rafael Benitez of Valencia, but this is only speculation and I actually have no firm view on who it should be.
What I do know is that this is a dream time to be taking over at Liverpool. It is not as if you are replacing a manager such as Sir Alex Ferguson and Arsene Wenger, who have won so many titles.
There is really only one way Liverpool can go now, and that is up.
Liverpool have two of England's world class players in Michael Owen and Steven Gerrard, and will have big money to spend.
The new man must first of all get Owen to sign a new deal and assure Gerrard that ambitious moves are in place to take the club forward.
And then, as Houllier would have had to do if he stayed, he must get the club's next three signings right because they cannot afford to fall further behind Arsenal, Chelsea and Manchester United.
But, come what may, Liverpool can only move forward.
It is very sad that Gerard has gone because he is a nice guy, who is a brilliant organiser and has transformed the training set-up.
But the bottom line is results and performances, and it is the lack of those two things that led the Anfield gallery to become disgruntled and led to Houllier's departure.