Golden boot winner - Who will be the top scorer

International Football/Football World Wide - General Discussion

Postby Ace Ventura » Fri Jun 02, 2006 2:14 pm

0asis wrote:England probably do have better players than Mexico, not going to deny that, but Mexico play like a team and not individuals. Most of the Mexican players have never been heard of before. Doesn't mean to say they're not a good set of players. But at the end of the day it's about working as a unit, not as individuals and England look far superior on paper, but that doesn't mean they are on the pitch.

You brand Mexico's group as being poor, you're right it was but then again England's group wasn't exactly difficult, so that argument doesn't wash at all. At the end of of it all you can only beat what's put in front of you .

Mexico have changed a lot over the past four years, they are a lot stronger as a team then what they were in that World Cup. Whether they are able to go further this time remains to be seen as I say they can be hit and miss at times.

As you say England have much better players than Mexico so they should be able to get thru matches if they fall into the dreaded penalty shoot outs. It's funny how teams like Portugal etc have absolutely no problems taking penalties yet England do. And more excuses heat and humidity, these players trained for a few weeks in the heat of Japan, they should of adjusted to it, Germany did, and Germany has a much cooler climate than in England. I'll agree England were outplayed in the second half, that's because they allowed themselves to be dominated.

England have the potential to go further than Mexico in the World Cup doesn't mean they will. A fair few of England's players have mixed it up with some of Europe's finest, on paper they look far superior but football's not played on paper, it's played on the pitch so again there's a 50% chance of England beating Mexico.

As I said England havea great set of individual talent, if England can work together as a unit they have a good chance of doing well, but they must show the right mentality and attitude to do well. Mexico have Fonseca, Andres Guardado, Jared Borgetti, Marquez and Sanchez, so the Mexicans have a good set of players who work as a unit and play some outstanding and exciting football.

Fair enough thats your opinion, nothing wrong with that and England have a great chance as long as the players have the right mentality, attitude and don't lose bottle in big matches and penalty shoot outs and the same applies to Sven, he must not be too cautious in this tournament.

Germany had an easier draw than England in the world cup, when they faced Brazil in the final they were also outclassed.
The brazilians are all comfortable in posession and despite the fact that they were a player down they were keeping the ball for long periods. In heat and humidty after a long season that will affect most players (especially europeans who dont play in them type of conditions).
To lose on penalties is unlucky, perhaps they should of made sure they won the game in normal time but lets be realistic when it gets to the knockout stages in major tournaments most games are really tight as nobody wants to lose, thats why there are so many penalty shoot outs nowadays.
You are using Mexico's good results in the confederations cup as a benchmark ?
a) Its a tournament that i dont rate at all.
b) 2 of the teams in there group were not the best.
Where i accept they did well, they played Japan (no mugs, but England would have no problems) Greece (the luckiest EVER european champions) and fair enough Brazil....a country they play often and are bound to get the odd decent result against.
If you think the climate has nothing to do with it and the players should of adjusted thats just plain wrong, they may of adjusted but they wont be as used to playing in conditions like that as Brazil and the asian teams.
If you think Englands group was easy (which it was) then imagine they faced some of the central american sides ?
It is one of the poorest qualifying sections for the competition and the fact that Mexico are in there wont help when it comes to facing proper opponents.
I think Mexico will give anyone a game, but if they face anyone of Spain Holland England Germany Italy or the likes of Brazil & Argentina they will come unstuck, i would also fancy Ivory Coast turning them over.
They never will be candidates to win the world cup.
The only thing i accept of your argument is the fact that Sven has picked the wrong squad, but still with that squad if we play Mexico there is no way we will go out, no matter how technically superior you feel they may be.
Image





ALLLRIGHTY THEN !!
User avatar
Ace Ventura
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3952
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: Birkenhead

Postby 48-1119859832 » Fri Jun 02, 2006 2:48 pm

Ace Ventura wrote:Germany had an easier draw than England in the world cup, when they faced Brazil in the final they were also outclassed.
The brazilians are all comfortable in posession and despite the fact that they were a player down they were keeping the ball for long periods. In heat and humidty after a long season that will affect most players (especially europeans who dont play in them type of conditions).
To lose on penalties is unlucky, perhaps they should of made sure they won the game in normal time but lets be realistic when it gets to the knockout stages in major tournaments most games are really tight as nobody wants to lose, thats why there are so many penalty shoot outs nowadays.
You are using Mexico's good results in the confederations cup as a benchmark ?
a) Its a tournament that i dont rate at all.
b) 2 of the teams in there group were not the best.
Where i accept they did well, they played Japan (no mugs, but England would have no problems) Greece (the luckiest EVER european champions) and fair enough Brazil....a country they play often and are bound to get the odd decent result against.
If you think the climate has nothing to do with it and the players should of adjusted thats just plain wrong, they may of adjusted but they wont be as used to playing in conditions like that as Brazil and the asian teams.
If you think Englands group was easy (which it was) then imagine they faced some of the central american sides ?
It is one of the poorest qualifying sections for the competition and the fact that Mexico are in there wont help when it comes to facing proper opponents.
I think Mexico will give anyone a game, but if they face anyone of Spain Holland England Germany Italy or the likes of Brazil & Argentina they will come unstuck, i would also fancy Ivory Coast turning them over.
They never will be candidates to win the world cup.
The only thing i accept of your argument is the fact that Sven has picked the wrong squad, but still with that squad if we play Mexico there is no way we will go out, no matter how technically superior you feel they may be.

Ace,

You're making a whole barrel of excuses. Sure Germany had an easier "ride" to the final, than England would of had, had they got there. Again you can only beat what's infront of you. Germany were outclased yes, no doubt about that but they got the final something England has failed to do for years. You can use heat and humidity as an excuse to explain England's misfortune, you can say the turf was too green, the stadium was too big, the Brazilians were lucky. When really there are no excuses, England were simply not good enough. Sure there are factors in any tournement that put a country/ team at a disadvantage but then that's the same with any team/ country, so it's time to admit that for the past forty years England has simply not been good enough to win anything and that's why England still drone on about 1966.

I agree a lot of International matches do go to penalties. However if a team is a great team like Brazil and are able to do the job then there are rarely penalties. One thing I've always noticed about English players is that when it comes to the final hurdle e.g penalties, final rounds of tournements, the lads never look up for the fight, there doesn't seem to be a strong intent just this typical, weak mentality of "try your best lad and don't worry there's always 4 years time".

I'm basing my facts on a number of years watching Mexico play, not just the Confederations cup 2005 and post - Confederation cup matches. They have grown a lot stronger than what they were four years ago, new players have come in and they have looked very impressive. Two of their teams in their group were not the best? I think you're referring to Japan who are not an easy team to play against, they're not the best team your likely to come up against but they are not easy obstacle to over come and Greece the European Chmapions are not an easy team to beat either. Oh and is it not a great tournement because England wasn't in it?

I'm not saying climate has nothing to do with it but you do realise England is getting much warmer due to Global warming so that good old English excuse is on it's last legs. As I said there are factors in tournements which are an advantage and disadvantage to a team, you make out as if England are the only team to get many disadvantages, what separates the average and good teams from the great teams is being able to get a strong mental mind set and turn those disadvantages on their head and get on with the job in hand.

You seem to fail to understand that you can only beat what's in front of you and Mexico can't help it's self if it's on the American continent can it? What do you want it to do? Drag it'self over from America and connect it'self to Portugal or the Ireland? Most qualifying fixtures and groups are easy for the bigger teams like France, Brazil, England and yes Mexico.

Mexico don't turn up to give people a game, they show intent to win and I find it hilarious that you're sitting there and trying to pick apart their results. Mexico are a big team with a great set of players who are all very techincally gifted, they are indeed underdogs but they wouldn't have any other way. You sit there and write them off, I don't blame you after all you've probably heard of only three of thier players.

As for them losing to England, France, Germany, Holland, Brazil, we shall see won't we?
48-1119859832
 

Postby Big Niall » Fri Jun 02, 2006 3:23 pm

People assume England will win their group, they might but Sweden have a lot of quality. Larssen in pure class, Ljungberg and the Juventus striker (whose name I won't try and spell) are also capable of causing England lots of problems. While Terry is rock solid (2 good full backs too), if I was the opposition manager I'd have a go at Ferdinand.

I don't know much about Paraguay though.
Big Niall
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 4202
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 2:30 pm

Postby Ace Ventura » Fri Jun 02, 2006 3:38 pm

Yes we will see.

Just woke up as i dozed off halfway through that drivel.
It started off with the attempted put down saying...you can say the turf was too green, the stadium was too big, the Brazilians were lucky. What a stupid statement, the heat and humidity are/were a factor, the colour of the turf wont affect anything or the size of the stadium, i never once said Brazil were lucky, they were the better side after Ronaldinho was wrongly sent off, what i said is that Germany had faced anyone of that quality until the final itself.
Brazil deserved there win and were by far the best team of the tournament but England if they faced them in different conditions i feel would fare better. That may sound stupid but what i mean is that the conditions can suit players and that will affect the performance and result.
You are right i have only heard of about 3 Mexico players, that doesnt mean they are sh!te but it does mean that they are also not world class players. Or they would be playing in the top leagues for the top clubs.
Again that doesnt mean that they are not a good side, they probably are and i am sure that whoever faces Mexico they will have a tough game, but i am sticking by what i have said that Mexico would go out to any of the sides i listed and probably a few others as well.
Image





ALLLRIGHTY THEN !!
User avatar
Ace Ventura
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3952
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: Birkenhead

Postby 48-1119859832 » Fri Jun 02, 2006 3:45 pm

It's drivel to you because you are far too ignorant to accept that Mexico are a geniune threat, you are saying Holland could win, Brazil could, Argentina could, England could because you know a lot of about these teams, you don't know much about Mexico that's why you are putting them down. You carry on being ignorant towards Mexico, we'll see...we'll see.
Last edited by 48-1119859832 on Fri Jun 02, 2006 3:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
48-1119859832
 

Postby 48-1119859832 » Fri Jun 02, 2006 3:52 pm

Oh and another thing just because only three Mexicans in the Mexico squad play in Europe doesn't mean they are s.*i*e. Alot play for great Mexican clubs back in their homeland or in other leagues such as Brazil's and Argentina's top leagues. So again you've fallen flat on your face.
48-1119859832
 

Postby Ace Ventura » Fri Jun 02, 2006 3:54 pm

0asis wrote:It's drivel to you because you are far too ignorant to accept that Mexico are a geniune threat, you are saying Holland could win, Brazil could, Argentina could, England could because you know a lot of about these teams, you don't know much about Mexico that's why you are putting them down. You carry on being ignorant towards Mexico, we'll see...we'll see.

Are you Mexican ?

It wasnt the fact that you think Mexico are a threat thats the drivel, it was the basic ignorance in your long winded reply.
You tried to belittle me with a stupid remark disregarding the major point i was making about climate in Japan being a major factor.
Mexico may surprise me, it wouldnt be the first time i have been wrong or surprised in football, but the way you have questioned england and its players commitment because they lose tournaments on penalties is a joke imo.
They do not lack desire or will to win if they lose in that manner, it is generally pot luck who goes through in games like that and is definately not through a lack of desire when a team goes out in that way.
Image





ALLLRIGHTY THEN !!
User avatar
Ace Ventura
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3952
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: Birkenhead

Postby 48-1119859832 » Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:09 pm

Ace,

I am not Mexican, no. And I wasn't trying to belittle you and if I have come across as being ignorant and belittling, so be it, altho that's not what I was tryin to do. I've acknowledged your point about the climate but then Germany which is a country much colder then our own was able to cope with it, had most of the European teams went out when we did, fair enough I would of accepted it. However Germany were able to survive it and it's the small fact England have used that excuse for years.

I'm not questioning England player's commitment just becoz they lose on penalties, I'm question there commitment as a whole. I've haven't seen an English team since the one in 1990 show a lot of intent, show the right mentality and have the right attitude to do well. You're making every excuse under the sun to defend England's 40 yrs of hurt and I for one am not excepting this reasons or excuses. Call me ignorant but England have always had a good set of individual players and have always been contenders but they will never be a great team until they are able to handle the pressure of the final third of the tournements they enter, they will never be a great side until they show the right attitude, the right mentality and they can never be a great side until they can work as a solid unit.

Maybe this is England's World Cup, maybe it isn't. Who know? Maybe England will show the right mentality and show the right attitude, dig in deep and get the results or maybe they will bow out again without a stern challenge, who knows? I'm not trying to say that England don't have a chance, I'm not saying that England have a bad squad, I'm saying they have to improve their attitudes and mentalities and if they can do that and play well and Sven isn't too defensive and cautious then I can't see no reason why they can lift the WC.
Last edited by 48-1119859832 on Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
48-1119859832
 

Postby Ace Ventura » Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:28 pm

0asis wrote:Ace,

I am not Mexican, no. And I wasn't trying to belittle you and if I have come across as being ignorant and belittling, so be it, altho that's not what I was tryin to do. I've acknowledged your point about the climate but then Germany which is a country much colder then our own was able to cope with it, had most of the European teams went out when we did, fair enough I would of accepted it. However Germany were able to survive it and it's the small fact England have used that excuse for years.

I'm not questioning England player's commitment just becoz they lose on penalties, I'm question there commitment as a whole. I've haven't seen an English team since the one in 1990 show a lot of intent, show the right mentality and have the right attitude to do well. You're making every excuse under the sun to defend England's 40 yrs of hurt and I for one am not excepting this reasons or excuses. Call me ignorant but England have always had a good set of individual players and have always been contenders but they will never be a great team until they are able to handle the pressure of the final third of the tournements they enter, they will never be a great side until they show the right attitude, the right mentality and they can never be a great side until they can work as a solid unit.

Maybe this is England's World Cup, maybe it isn't. Who know? Maybe England will show the right mentality and show the right attitude, dig in deep and get the results or maybe they will bow out again without a stern challenge, who knows? I'm not trying to say that England don't have a chance, I'm not saying that England have a bad squad, I'm saying they have to improve their attitudes and mentalities and if they can do that and play well and Sven isn't too defensive and cautious then I can't see no reason why they can lift the WC.

You are a bell, i used one excuse and it was valid.
Germany did get to the final, 2 games further than us but then were comfortably taken apart by Brazil coincidentaly the side that took us apart. So if Germany and Brazil had met in the quarters and we would of played who Germany had played do you feel they would of went out ?
Previously in France we were very unlucky against Argentina losing on penalties after Sol Campbells goal was wrongly disallowed, that is a fact.
We didnt qualify for USA after Graham Taylor being in charge.
Going back to Italia 90, knocked out on penalties against eventual winners Germany, game could of gone either way, 2 evenly matched sides gave there all and we lost, i was gutted but dont think the lads lacked effort.
MEXICO 86, the first world cup i remember, we were sh!te in the group but got better with each game resulting in a massive game against Argentina, Maradona scored probably the best world cup goal ever, and obviously cheated with the other, Lineker replied and missed a sitter near the end, we ended up losing out to a disputed goal to the eventual champions, again i dont think we lacked any desire.
You may think they are all excuses i may think you are blind and unpatriotic. I dont care, i know the lads gave there all in them tournaments and were unlucky in some and not good enough in others.
What i also know is that in every one they have been a threat and always been a match for the major countries. As we will this time, you should have a bit more pride in your country.
Image





ALLLRIGHTY THEN !!
User avatar
Ace Ventura
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3952
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: Birkenhead

Postby stmichael » Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:35 pm

at the end of the day, that german team of 2002 were a two man team (they had ballack and khan) who reached the final by playing saudi arabia, ireland, cameroon, paraguay, USA and south korea. i mean what kind of a test is that? they won't go far even with home advantage.
User avatar
stmichael
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 22644
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:06 pm
Location: Middlesbrough

Postby 48-1119859832 » Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:40 pm

You have your views, I have mine; I'd rather not get into a situation were we are exchanging insults, I also think there is little more to discuss on this topic, before we end up going full circle. We both have our opinions, lets just leave it there. As for me not having enough pride in my own country that is simply not true, I have pride in England and I hope we do well, I just feel we lack a few vital ingredients to be crowned Champions of the World.
48-1119859832
 

Postby 48-1119859832 » Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:41 pm

stmichael wrote:at the end of the day, that german team of 2002 were a two man team (they had ballack and khan) who reached the final by playing saudi arabia, ireland, cameroon, paraguay, USA and south korea. i mean what kind of a test is that? they won't go far even with home advantage.

Again, you can only beat what's infront of you. And you brand Germany a two man team, I bet when a bitter or Manc brands us team Gerrard you're one of the first ppl to get up in arms about it. The double standards from a lot of people on here is dreadful.  :no
Last edited by 48-1119859832 on Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
48-1119859832
 

Postby account deleted by request » Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:48 pm

Previously in France we were very unlucky against Argentina losing on penalties after Sol Campbells goal was wrongly disallowed
I agree with a lot of your post so maybe I am just nitpicking but ffs did you not see Shearers elbow on their goalkeeper? If that "goal " had been scored against England we would all have been up in arms. South american teams play a lot more possession football because in the extreme heat over there it tires the other team out. In the cooler European climate it doesnt have same effect. Hence their lack of success in europe.
account deleted by request
 
Posts: 20690
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:11 am

Postby 48-1119859832 » Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:55 pm

s@int wrote:
Previously in France we were very unlucky against Argentina losing on penalties after Sol Campbells goal was wrongly disallowed
I agree with a lot of your post so maybe I am just nitpicking but ffs did you not see Shearers elbow on their goalkeeper? If that "goal " had been scored against England we would all have been up in arms. South american teams play a lot more possession football because in the extreme heat over there it tires the other team out. In the cooler European climate it doesnt have same effect. Hence their lack of success in europe.

Possession football works anywhere. However the tactic of wearing teams out will not work no. The problem with a lot of South American teams is the small fact they are more attacking then anything else, therefore at times will bomb men forward and neglect their defensive duties, therefore being very vulnerable to being hit on the counter attack.
48-1119859832
 

Postby Bad Bob » Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:51 am

0asis wrote:It's drivel to you because you are far too ignorant to accept that Mexico are a geniune threat, you are saying Holland could win, Brazil could, Argentina could, England could because you know a lot of about these teams, you don't know much about Mexico that's why you are putting them down. You carry on being ignorant towards Mexico, we'll see...we'll see.

You do realize that Mexico are going to get knocked out at the group stages now don't you?  You've built them up into a footballing colossus and stuck your neck way out on this one...don't be surprised when it blows up in your face!  :no  :D
Image
User avatar
Bad Bob
LFC Guru Member
 
Posts: 11269
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:03 pm
Location: Canada

PreviousNext

Return to Football World Wide - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e