Liverpool FC Forum

Benny The Noon » Mon Apr 22, 2013 10:48 pm wrote:

Thommo's perm » Mon Apr 22, 2013 11:46 pm wrote:Yes but you havent said why?
You do know why dont you?

Because I think it's more serious than your average red card offence hence a stronger punishment than just a 3 game ban.

Hopefully you can grasp it now.

I knew you'd thought it through, you little tinker
I ask again: if a 7 game ban didnt deter him from repeating the offence why the fu'ck would a 5 or 6 game ban?
Please hurry up because you are boring me
Thanks

We're getting away from the subject. I was only trying to say that we aren't given a fair treatment. I believe that all of these should be treated in the same way and I just named those examples (headbutting, kicking etc. which in reality are more serious than biting IMO) in order to support my statement; that we aren't treated fairly. With these examples I was also trying to say that if someone deserves a longer punishment it is those who have done or had a bigger possibility of doing a bigger damage to their "victim".

I think you believe the same Benny. I really don't know why are we having this argument.

Because I would hope that the deterrent would come from closed doors from the club

The ban is the punishment for the act

It's not rocket science ( or is it rocket surgery )

Maybe in the end he won't ever learn and continue to put himself in these situations

damjan193 » Mon Apr 22, 2013 11:55 pm wrote:We're getting away from the subject. I was only trying to say that we aren't given a fair treatment. I believe that all of these should be treated in the same way and I just named those examples (headbutting, kicking etc. which in reality are more serious than biting IMO) in order to support my statement; that we aren't treated fairly. With these examples I was also trying to say that if someone deserves a longer punishment it is those who have done or had a bigger possibility of doing a bigger damage to their "victim".

I think you believe the same Benny. I really don't know why are we having this argument.

And people will think that biting a fellow pro is actually worse than a late tackle etc - in a physical game tempers flare and tackles fly in and people go overboard but biting someone ! That's a disgusting cowardly act.

As for fair treatment - every club will believe there is an agenda against them

Benny The Noon » Mon Apr 22, 2013 10:58 pm wrote:Because I would hope that the deterrent would come from closed doors from the club

The ban is the punishment for the act

It's not rocket science ( or is it rocket surgery )

Maybe in the end he won't ever learn and continue to put himself in these situations

So maybe all these stupid lengthy bans are a waste of time? Now you are begining to think like an adult
Keep it going and you may say something sensible soon...

A ban isn't given in the instance as a deterrent  - it's called punishment

I'm sure even you understand that.

What would be your punishment for Suarez

There is a difference between making a tackle and deliberately kicking opponents.

So we go back to where we started. Is breaking someone's nose better than biting him? Just because it was disgusting and cowardly (which I agree that it was), it doesn't mean that it's worse than the other examples.

I really didn't plan on arguing on this silly and obvious matter for this long. We aren't treated fairly and it's a fact. I'll stop now, it's getting silly, the subject isn't worthy.

jacdaniel » Mon Apr 22, 2013 10:12 am wrote:He screwed up, take whatever punishment is handed to him and move on.

Zis

There must be something wrong in the world when I find it easier to read Gary Neville on a sky site then some of ***** here

http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11669/8666374/Monday-Night-Football-Gary-Neville-says-Luis-Suarez-can-stay-at-Liverpool

supersub » Mon Apr 22, 2013 9:39 pm wrote:

Benny The Noon » Mon Apr 22, 2013 9:29 pm wrote:
You would be surprised on what you could catch from someone biting you.

I've seen the Walking Dead.......it surprised me how contagious it is..... the FA need to act now to prevent a world epidemic...Ivanovic should be put in quaratine for at least 28 days

its way too late for that!! 



cred to @breakfastpercy

Even the prime minister has got involved... doesn't he have enough on his plate already?

laza » Tue Apr 23, 2013 8:09 am wrote:There must be something wrong in the world when I find it easier to read Gary Neville on a sky site then some of ***** here

http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11669/8666374/Monday-Night-Football-Gary-Neville-says-Luis-Suarez-can-stay-at-Liverpool

Excellent response from the fat, scabby Manc.   

We're a laughing stock. 

That's what happens when you do stupid things mate.  You better hope the idiot doesn't win footballer of the year basis votes already cast or that will look well stooopid.

Benny The Noon » Mon Apr 22, 2013 11:06 pm wrote:A ban isn't given in the instance as a deterrent  - it's called punishment

I'm sure even you understand that.

What would be your punishment for Suarez

So youre going for retribution rather than deterrent? Interesting
In punishing Suarez you would effectively be punishing LFC and therefore the supporters. How twisted are you?
What the fu'ck have I done to you to deserve this???