burjennio wrote:Drogba has been sh*t for the last few months because he has been suffering from a potentially fatal disease!
Thommo's perm wrote:woof woof ! wrote:Thommo's perm wrote:Where I come from calling someone a knob is insulting
I'd have thought you'd be used to it by now.
Good one
Its the bitter jibe that hurt
Anyway if it makes you feel better to call someone names, carry on
paisleyred wrote:If i had to choose Stevie or Nando, Stevie would win every day of the week!
Apparently he wants to leave because London has a better range of hair products.dobber!
Waldo wrote:Even if we got £40M + Sturridge I would take it. From what I have seen of Sturridge he looks a good prospect and certainly knows where the back of the net is. He also fits with the clubs new philosophy of young homegrown talent.
When you consider Torres' injury record over the past 2 seasons I cant help but think that a young hugry combination of Suarez and Sturridge would more than fill the void (most importantly the goals) that we would get from Torres.
I may be in the minority here but I honestly think that losing Torres now is not a disaster as we have
a) signed a very good replacement in Suarez and
b) Would have multi-millions to spend to strengthen throughout the squad
maguskwt wrote:The thing is we are still in with a chance of getting 4th which is only 9 pts away... so why would we wanna strengthen our rivals for who are currently occupying the 4th place... I would rather ask him to honour is contract with the risk of an unhappy player than strengthen our rivals...
Torres lad, bad feckin move! You could join Barca or Real or Inter or Milan or whichever european giants... but not any of our rivals in the Premier League...
stmichael wrote:the thing is i'm not even sure he'd fit in at chelsea. he'd just be another cog in the machine there and there's no way he'd bond with their sh#t fans.
not convinced about these reports of us getting sturridge either. is he really better than ngog?
maguskwt wrote:stmichael wrote:the thing is i'm not even sure he'd fit in at chelsea. he'd just be another cog in the machine there and there's no way he'd bond with their sh#t fans.
not convinced about these reports of us getting sturridge either. is he really better than ngog?
That's the thing... they're offering a player we don't need... why would we want Daniel feckin Sturridge? We got Pacheco, Ngog, Amoo...
Give us 30 million + Essien and I'd say that's a fair deal...
NANNY RED wrote:What the fu.ck was Purslow thinking letting a clause go into that contract
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 78 guests