simple answer
YES
Igor Zidane wrote:bigmick wrote:How Hodgson does though has nothing whatsoever to do with whether or not it was the right thing to do to get rid of Benitez. Taking Hodgson on and letting Benitez go aren't interlinked, they are independant events. It remains to be seen whether or not it was the right thing to do to give Roy a shot, but certainly IMHO getting rid of Benitez was an absolute no brainer.
Similarly, those who disagree visa vis Benitez are entitled to their view obviously, but if or when he bombs out at inter, or wins the Champions League with Inter, it won't mean it was either more wrong or more right to let him go.
Even if we got relegated under Hodgson (which obviously we won't), it would still be a given for me that we had to get rid of Benitez. The players seemingly agree with that as well, so there's no argument to be had really.
I would agree with you mick if we had employed someone better to take his place . We didn't , and that is the problem .
NANNY RED wrote:dundreamin wrote:ERR Rafas gone. Yep he,s gone. Now close this pointless thread. I mean whats THE POINT?
But we might have to open it again![]()
Thommo's perm wrote:maguskwt wrote:Ola Mr Benitez wrote:Was sacking Rafa correct - YES.
Was employing Roy correct - Only time will tell! But he hasnt had the time yet to prove anything either way as well as the worst fixture list since 1957!!!!
Excuses mate... Whatever the fixture list, we should have won 2 more games than now. The fact is that we have the worst start in the league sine 1953.
"Whatever the fixture list, we should have won 2 more games than now."
Is that what all this is about? If we would have won 2 more games than we have out of 7 there would have been none of this hysteria?
180 minutes worth of football causing all this bile?
Deary deary me
bigmick wrote:Benny The Noon wrote:And some people will think the total opposite and some think Rafa going was a big mistake .
Naturally. Some people would have thought Rafa leaving was a mistake even if he'd got us relegated I should think, that or they'd have blamed it on somebody else.
bigmick wrote:As for the question of whather or not a manager is "better", I don't think that's the overriding consideration, or at least it shouldn't be. The main thing to consider is whether or not the manager in situ is likely to improve things, and the board took the view that in Benitez's case it was unlikely. Once you've pulled the trigger, you take a punt on somebody else.
bigmick wrote:Benny The Noon wrote:Thommo we could of been bottom if Rafa stayed but we could of been in the top 4 .
Well of course we COULD have been in the top four. Lets look at it sensibly though.
I'm going to be charitable and say that if Rafa were the manager we'd also have beaten Blackpool to go with our win against West Brom. Would we though have got a result at Old Trafford (where we did only once in Rafa's career,) and would we have won at Brum (where nobody else had for a year and we couldn't even beat them at Home for years). Would we have won at Man City (who also saw off Chelsea at Home), and would we have got a point with 10 men against Arsenal (we got beat at Home by them the season before)?
Yes we could have been top four, but my guess is that we would have had a very similar points haul to the one we've actually got. If anybody on here had said the things about Rafa under those circumstances that they've said about Roy there would have been uproar.
NANNY RED wrote:dundreamin wrote:ERR Rafas gone. Yep he,s gone. Now close this pointless thread. I mean whats THE POINT?
But we might have to open it again![]()
maguskwt wrote:bigmick wrote:Benny The Noon wrote:Thommo we could of been bottom if Rafa stayed but we could of been in the top 4 .
Well of course we COULD have been in the top four. Lets look at it sensibly though.
I'm going to be charitable and say that if Rafa were the manager we'd also have beaten Blackpool to go with our win against West Brom. Would we though have got a result at Old Trafford (where we did only once in Rafa's career,) and would we have won at Brum (where nobody else had for a year and we couldn't even beat them at Home for years). Would we have won at Man City (who also saw off Chelsea at Home), and would we have got a point with 10 men against Arsenal (we got beat at Home by them the season before)?
Yes we could have been top four, but my guess is that we would have had a very similar points haul to the one we've actually got. If anybody on here had said the things about Rafa under those circumstances that they've said about Roy there would have been uproar.
what's the use in all this speculation? waste of time and energy. The fact is that Rafa's team were never in the relegation zone in 6 years. Roy's team is within 3 months... so...
maguskwt wrote:bigmick wrote:Benny The Noon wrote:Thommo we could of been bottom if Rafa stayed but we could of been in the top 4 .
Well of course we COULD have been in the top four. Lets look at it sensibly though.
I'm going to be charitable and say that if Rafa were the manager we'd also have beaten Blackpool to go with our win against West Brom. Would we though have got a result at Old Trafford (where we did only once in Rafa's career,) and would we have won at Brum (where nobody else had for a year and we couldn't even beat them at Home for years). Would we have won at Man City (who also saw off Chelsea at Home), and would we have got a point with 10 men against Arsenal (we got beat at Home by them the season before)?
Yes we could have been top four, but my guess is that we would have had a very similar points haul to the one we've actually got. If anybody on here had said the things about Rafa under those circumstances that they've said about Roy there would have been uproar.
what's the use in all this speculation? waste of time and energy. The fact is that Rafa's team were never in the relegation zone in 6 years. Roy's team is within 3 months... so...
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 74 guests