Liverpool FC Forum

Benny The Noon wrote:I'm going to post exactly how I see it - like I said are my negatives incorrect ? How about actually discussing what I see are negate about him instead of trying to go into politics about my reasoning to what I am posting - discuss content instead of intent . Tell me what is wrong with what I see as being negative - Tarnred managed to do it so why can't others

Because i can see the hidden agenda 

Ben Patrick wrote:

Benny The Noon wrote:I'm going to post exactly how I see it - like I said are my negatives incorrect ? How about actually discussing what I see are negate about him instead of trying to go into politics about my reasoning to what I am posting - discuss content instead of intent . Tell me what is wrong with what I see as being negative - Tarnred managed to do it so why can't others

Because i can see the hidden agenda 

Benny The Noon wrote:

Ben Patrick wrote:

Benny The Noon wrote:I'm going to post exactly how I see it - like I said are my negatives incorrect ? How about actually discussing what I see are negate about him instead of trying to go into politics about my reasoning to what I am posting - discuss content instead of intent . Tell me what is wrong with what I see as being negative - Tarnred managed to do it so why can't others

Because i can see the hidden agenda 

And that post sums up exactly what the problem is with be forum - people are constantly ignoring what people are saying and just focusing on his apparent " hidden agenda " that is only apparent in their own head- try ignoring your urges and debate to content of the post - the place maybe a better place then . I have no hidden agenda .

yes you do. It's clear to see.

Benny The Noon wrote:Ok then please just steer clear of my posts in future if your just going to ignore what the content is . Thank you

That's difficult there in EVERY thread 

Benny The Noon wrote:The second goal which came from a cross - Konchesky allowed Nani to slip in unoticed behind him because Konchesky was too close to the cbs and they played the ball straight over his head to the feet of nani - Konchesky went to close him down but Nani to switched the ball to his left foot and got the cross in easily - it was one against one - he wasnt double teamed . As for the third goal - Agger is a cb not a natural left back but some blame must be given to Jovanovic as well as Agger closed down Nani quickly but shifted the ball to O Shea ( who was rightly still on the pitch ) who put the cross in , Jovanovic should of been marking O shea .

Ben Patrick wrote:

Benny The Noon wrote:The second goal which came from a cross - Konchesky allowed Nani to slip in unoticed behind him because Konchesky was too close to the cbs and they played the ball straight over his head to the feet of nani - Konchesky went to close him down but Nani to switched the ball to his left foot and got the cross in easily - it was one against one - he wasnt double teamed . As for the third goal - Agger is a cb not a natural left back but some blame must be given to Jovanovic as well as Agger closed down Nani quickly but shifted the ball to O Shea ( who was rightly still on the pitch ) who put the cross in , Jovanovic should of been marking O shea .

The 2nd goal was just one of those things, a cross came in from our left but it wasnt the cross that made the goal.
It was crossed from a poor angle really and didnt come at Berbatov in a good position at all. He had to control it with his back to goal with his knee.
If you think that's Koncheskys fault for not shutting out the initial cross then i think it underlines your over criticism.
To stop every cross isnt possible. What you need to do is try and make sure balls come in from angles that should suit the defending team, i think that was one of those crosses, Berbatovs genius made that goal from nothing.

Ben Patrick wrote:You could say that about every goal.
There is no way that he can stay touch tight all of the time against someone who is quicker than him and pretty skillfull.
I agree on the concept of stopping the majority of crosses but forcing players to cross from a tougher position is key and you genuinely cant really do anything about the finish for the second goal.

You are being overcritical of Konchesky if you feel he was at fault for that goal.

Benny The Noon wrote:

Ben Patrick wrote:You could say that about every goal.
There is no way that he can stay touch tight all of the time against someone who is quicker than him and pretty skillfull.
I agree on the concept of stopping the majority of crosses but forcing players to cross from a tougher position is key and you genuinely cant really do anything about the finish for the second goal.

You are being overcritical of Konchesky if you feel he was at fault for that goal.

Well thats what i feel - i feel he was to blame for the goal along with a few others . And then there is the first goal as well .

Cos you have an agenda 

Ben Patrick wrote:

Benny The Noon wrote:

Ben Patrick wrote:You could say that about every goal.
There is no way that he can stay touch tight all of the time against someone who is quicker than him and pretty skillfull.
I agree on the concept of stopping the majority of crosses but forcing players to cross from a tougher position is key and you genuinely cant really do anything about the finish for the second goal.

You are being overcritical of Konchesky if you feel he was at fault for that goal.

Well thats what i feel - i feel he was to blame for the goal along with a few others . And then there is the first goal as well .

Cos you have an agenda 

Ben Patrick wrote:Cos you have an agenda 

woof woof ! wrote:

Ben Patrick wrote:Cos you have an agenda 

I'm beginning to think he's not the only one.

Can we pack in this continuous public discussion on others motives "behind" their opinion. It's spam and is suffocating many a thread.

Reminder, repeated spam is a cardable offence.