by bigmick » Thu May 06, 2010 9:33 am
Aquilani is a really strange one, not as a footballer, but as a catalyst for people to get all worked up. As a footballer, he obviously has talent and ability, and the question is really whether he can impose himself on matches sufficiently to compensate for the fact he doesn't do a lot of graft and is defensively non existent. He's hardly the first player who has had to deal with doubters such as myself, blokes like Modric and Deco will always and continue to polarise opinions amongst football followers.
So are people wrong to have faith in him? Well no obviously they aren't. The bare stats of his appearances (six starts and eight assistants or whatever the feck it is) indicate that our eyes don't decieve us, he has got ability. Also, he's scored a couple of goals (one of which was an excellent one against Athletico Madrid), so clearly he isn't sh!t. The question still remains though, and those of us who ask it aren't wrong either.
It's when people get hot under the collar that they get carried away. Earlier on we had someone comparing him to Alonso which made me sit up. Firstly they aren't even similar types of player so the comparison doesn't hold water, and secondly Alonso is in a different class entirely. The next outlandish claim was that Aquilani could become one of the best attacking midfielders we've ever had. Quite apart from the fact that he can't get in the team as a genuine midfielder, it is a quite ridiculous statement. Sorry to be so dismissive but come on, fecks sake lets try and keep it sensible at least.
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".