peewee wrote:kazza wrote:peewee wrote:insult me
Err ok
You seem to know more about cack than football probably because you see it after every date.

Fo Dne wrote:LFC2007 wrote:Fo Dne wrote:LFC2007 wrote:Fo Dne wrote:Rush Job wrote:And to think there were a couple of posters on here claiming he wasnt even injured.
He's picked up a strain at worst lad. They've released that statement for the element of suprise. If he's not on the bench for the mancs at least al be EXTREMELY suprised.
3 months MINIMUM with a torn hamstring. He wouldn't av walked off the pitch like he did either, am tellin ya.
Two and a half months MAXIMUM recovery time for a severe hamstring strain.
It isn't that severe otherwise he wouldn't have walked off, but going by the statement it could be 2 to 3 weeks, and for that reason I don't think he'll be risked at all for the Man U game.
Massive difference in a strain and a tear.
The article clearly says tear.
Its upto six months for a tear. Anyone who tells you otherwise is talking out there. If you come back too soon you will never recover as much as possible and you'll become weaker and prone to it.
Ever seen that one before?
No, 2 and a half months maximum then.
A tear can be a type of strain, i.e. a very small tear of the muscle fibres, that's why strains are often reported as tears.
A severe tear for a top athlete will typically not take up to sixth months to heal, it will take within two and a half months. However, it may take up to six months for a sunday league player (for example) who isn't as fit and doesn't have access to the best rehabilitation facilities, or someone who has other injuries which inhibit rehab, or if the tear is so severe that it requires surgery (rare).
A severe tear (which does need surgery) can take upto six months to heal properly. Once its "healed" it then needs to regain strength aswell. Once you've regained strength you then need to build up fitness.
The website clearly says it can take upto 3 months for the hamstring to heal. That doesn't include complete rehabilitation and the regaining of fitness levels and the required rest. It clearly states for the hamstring to heal, there are different grades of healing.
If you rush a hamstring injury, you become at great risk of being prone to it in the future. like Michael Owen. If you don't let the first one heal properly and keep getting them... they can affect your ability to run and also a players speed and agility... like Michael Owen. It can then hinder you as a player and cause other injuries. like Michael Owen.
The fact you say a Sunday league player would be out for longer with the same injury shows a complete and utter lack of knowledge... granted professionals have physio's but so does anyone else... professional's are on a different planet altogether when it comes to injuries and fitness.
They get nailed on nearly every tackle, they use explosive pace and play against explosive players and they have to be 100% at all times. Sunday league players don't, not even close.
Professional's twist an ankle on Sunday and the chances are they will miss a Wednesday game through not being fit enough. They lose a hell of a lot, unlike a Sunday league player.
85% of them are that highly tuned that the slightest knock can set them back days, let alone a serious injury, hence the reason Gerrard doesn't want to play this weekend. He knows he won't be 100% and he probably won't do himself justice if he plays.
kazza wrote:bigmick wrote:You don't walk off
I do not know about recovering in two weeks but I tore fibers in my hamstring and walked off the field. I did not play for six months after that but I did walk off. I am sure adrenilin had something to do with it as the next day I was f.ucked.
Just because you agree it does not make it so.
GYBS wrote:So its severe tear you are talking about now ? not what torres had which was a slight tear which you said couldnt be true as he would be out for months ? you did say 3 months minimum for a tear where as you can actaully have a slight tear and be out for a couple of weeks and walk ok on it ?
stmichael wrote:If they're not 100% then neither Torres or Gerrard should play.
We rushed Torres back far too early against Arsenal last season and he only lasted 45 minutes.
stmichael wrote:If they're not 100% then neither Torres or Gerrard should play.
We rushed Torres back far too early against Arsenal last season and he only lasted 45 minutes.
bigmick wrote:GYBS wrote:So its severe tear you are talking about now ? not what torres had which was a slight tear which you said couldnt be true as he would be out for months ? you did say 3 months minimum for a tear where as you can actaully have a slight tear and be out for a couple of weeks and walk ok on it ?
We've fallen out about some strange things on the forum over the years, and none more strange than this. In days gone by, they would have said Torres has "strained" his hamstring when he wandered off. When Michael Owen collapsed in agony clutching the back of his leg and took months to recover, they would have said he had torn his hamstring.
Now whether in all technicality the strain represents a "slight tear" in his muscle (however slight), or in fact he had "tore fibres in his hamstring" I have absolutely no idea. I do though think it reasonable to assume though that the injury (torn hamstring as its commonly known) which many players have suffered from over the years (Michael Owen being the classic example) is different to the one which Torres walked off the pitch with the other day.
Quite why we are choosiung to have an argument about it is beyond me to be honest, but I have absolutely no doubts that some people will be able to pick through this ramble and dress it up as some sort of communist conspiracy at best, or the ramblings of the drinks waiter at worst.
Nothing really to fall out about here I don't think. Unless of course you're determined so to do.
GYBS wrote:as i said its nice and simple - the guy could easily of had a slight tear which was realised in the statement and could of easily walked off (know this through my physio course)
bigmick wrote:Well if you've done a physio course mate I'm not going to argue the point with you. I suppose you probably wouldn't argue the point either that with a full on hamsrtring tear, a la Michael Owen (or even me cos I can still remember the pain) would result in the player being unable to walk off and then play again in a couple of weeks.
I did notice that whilst I was putting my longish post together (keep the posts long and it keeps the replies sensible as only some can be bothered to read it) you put together a good post yourself mate. Like I say, if you have some technical knowledge of the whole thing you'll not get any argument from me cos I have none, just some bad memories.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 48 guests