Liverpool FC Forum

by **NorfolkRed** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:02 am

http://www.liverpoolfc.com/news/latest- ... er-to-fans

i like what i hear here.

by **LFC1990** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:07 am

Fantastic to hear. I think we have over reacted to behonest as we could have had a couple of penalties which could have changed the game. A win V sunderland and this place and the rest of the Liverpool supporters will have a much more positive outlook

by **Reg** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:12 am

RED BEERGOGGLES » Mon Sep 03, 2012 7:25 am wrote:
Reg » Sun Sep 02, 2012 11:58 am wrote:
Once again you show little understanding of the real world. They probably do have the resources but that doesn't mean they're foolish with their money, nor, having trusted Kenny/Comolli and watched him burn a serious amount of cash in the space of a few months, are they likely to be so naive again as to let an unproven manager spend another 100 million until he demonstrates his system works and he knows how to correctly identify, value and buy players.

Just because FSG has a big dick doesn't mean you have to show everyone.

We know full well the girth and size of the owners members mate ,because they seem intent on skull fucking Rodgers and the supporters
on every conceivable occasion .... Cuntz Reg ,regardless of how you dress them up .

Yeah baby !! :buttrock

So how d'you respond to John Henry's letter posted above? :ghostface:

by **metalhead** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:03 am

So many questions left unanswered reg,

And please we aren't deluded as he think we are, of course he is there for the profit

by **Boxscarf** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:21 am

metalhead » Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:03 am wrote:So many questions left unanswered reg,

And please we aren't deluded as he think we are, of course he is there for the profit

What profit? FSG will never ever recoup the £300m they brought the club unless they sell it for far more than they brought it. I too have liked what I've heard, but the problem with this club is that there is too much talk and very little actions. Actions speak louder than words, John W. Henry's words do not match his actions. I don't think £6m for Clint Dempsey would have been seen as 'reckless spending' as he puts it.

Clearly Rodgers's is suffering a backlash from the previous regime's reckless attitude towards investment money, so I hope FSG do the right thing and stand by Rodgers, irrespective of the season we may or may not have.

by **Roger Red Hat** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:26 am

they have genuinely come out and said how disappointed they were that they didn't get a striker, despite their best efforts. they really seem worried about this situation as we are. JWH letter to the fans underlines this. http://www.liverpoolfc.com/news/latest-news/john-henry-s-open-letter-to-fans

have a read, we're in this together.

by **Reg** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:29 am

6 million saved now is going to cost us 12 million in january.

by **tubby** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:31 am

Reg » Mon Sep 03, 2012 9:12 am wrote:
RED BEERGOGGLES » Mon Sep 03, 2012 7:25 am wrote:
Reg » Sun Sep 02, 2012 11:58 am wrote:
Once again you show little understanding of the real world. They probably do have the resources but that doesn't mean they're foolish with their money, nor, having trusted Kenny/Comolli and watched him burn a serious amount of cash in the space of a few months, are they likely to be so naive again as to let an unproven manager spend another 100 million until he demonstrates his system works and he knows how to correctly identify, value and buy players.

Just because FSG has a big dick doesn't mean you have to show everyone.

We know full well the girth and size of the owners members mate ,because they seem intent on skull fucking Rodgers and the supporters
on every conceivable occasion .... Cuntz Reg ,regardless of how you dress them up .

Yeah baby !!

So how d'you respond to John Henry's letter posted above? :ghostface:

Timly and a good response. Still though there will be questions over if Brendan will be allowed to re inforce in the Jan window.

But overall it shows that he is concerned with what the fans think. H&G would never had replied in that manner.

something I want clarification on though about money towards funds and FFP. Does the money we get in from sponsors count as money earned? So could that go towards transfers? I still feel Brendan wasn't given enough money this window and it may hamper how far we can progress this season. I'm sure I am not alone in feeling this Reg.

by **Boxscarf** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:36 am

Roger Red Hat » Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:26 am wrote:
have a read, we're in this together.

That's what George Osborne said prior to his Government's callous cuts to child-carers allowance, cuts to people's pensions and cuts to the Armed Forces while on tour in Afghanistan.

by **Roger Red Hat** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:02 pm

right o

by **tubby** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:10 pm

Also the letter, whilst being a nice gesture still fails to answer what went wrong with the Andy Carroll deal. Rogers says he wouldn't have let him go had he known he wasn't getting a replacement. So what transpired for him to be allowed to go and for us to not bring anyone in? Still many questions left needing answers. The stadium, the MD ect.... FSG should open up an open forum with SOS or some other fan group to alleviate fears. That's the only way they can truly keep the fans on their side.

by **RED BEERGOGGLES** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:22 pm

Reg » Mon Sep 03, 2012 9:12 am wrote:

So how d'you respond to John Henry's letter posted above? :ghostface:

Shallow and empty and completely "after the Lord Mayors Parade " In hindsight we can all sound adroit .

by **heimdall** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:37 pm

Boxscarf » Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:21 am wrote:
metalhead » Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:03 am wrote:So many questions left unanswered reg,

And please we aren't deluded as he think we are, of course he is there for the profit

What profit? FSG will never ever recoup the £300m they brought the club unless they sell it for far more than they brought it. I too have liked what I've heard, but the problem with this club is that there is too much talk and very little actions. Actions speak louder than words, John W. Henry's words do not match his actions. I don't think £6m for Clint Dempsey would have been seen as 'reckless spending' as he puts it.

Clearly Rodgers's is suffering a backlash from the previous regime's reckless attitude towards investment money, so I hope FSG do the right thing and stand by Rodgers, irrespective of the season we may or may not have.

As a club are we really so screwed financially that we could not afford an extra £2 million to get Dempsey, it's a joke and the owners are complete clowns imo. £2 million extra is not risking our financial future BUT it is a great way of p!ssing off the manager, fans and sponsors. Great job FSG and Ian Ayre you utter amateurs!! :veryangry

We are fast becoming an utter shambles of a club and unless these Kunt americans sell our club asap and take out their precious profit then we'll be midtable team for a hell of a long time possibly for ever more.

by **redalltheway36** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:43 pm

i heard the owners didnt buy Dempsey only cos they are saving up to buy Falcao in the january transfer window?

by **maguskwt** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:45 pm

RED BEERGOGGLES » Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:22 pm wrote:
Reg » Mon Sep 03, 2012 9:12 am wrote:

So how d'you respond to John Henry's letter posted above? :ghostface:

Shallow and empty and completely "after the Lord Mayors Parade " In hindsight we can all sound adroit .

Would you rather he kept quiet? and as a result showed that he didn't even care?

Liverpool FC Forum

NESV - OUR NEW OWNERS - Official Thread

Who is online