baldricks_cunning_plan wrote:s@int wrote:One player you seem to have left out of your post mate......... Robbie Keane. The fact that if we had bought someone more suitable with our £20million, or maybe once having bought him we had tried to get him playing to the level he can rather than destroying his confidence may have had a little something to do with us falling just short.
Quite possibly but Robbie Keane never suited the 4-2-3-1 formation and we shouldn't have changed it just to accommodate him.
People said let him play off Torres but he isn't a supporting midfielder, he's a forward who drops off. They are different roles. Bergkamp, Zola, Gudjohnsen, Keane that sort of player works with their back to goal rather than the Gerrard, Lampard, Scholes (in his hayday) who work latching onto the lose ball.
We tried the 4-4-2 with Torres and Keane but then Torres' injuries started to hit and we were back to square one. And Keane will never be a lone forward.
So possibly if the £20 million had been spent better or Torres stayed injury free so he and Keane could have linked up more often, we may have won the league.
bigmick wrote:baldricks_cunning_plan wrote:The same thing is happening at Anfield. Rafa hates losing and won't allow his players to lose anymore, very rarely will you see a Liverpool side give up the fight. And we have world class players all over the park.
Sometimes you just get the feeling that you're too far apart with somebody to have a meaningful discussion
baldricks_cunning_plan wrote:bigmick wrote:baldricks_cunning_plan wrote:The same thing is happening at Anfield. Rafa hates losing and won't allow his players to lose anymore, very rarely will you see a Liverpool side give up the fight. And we have world class players all over the park.
Sometimes you just get the feeling that you're too far apart with somebody to have a meaningful discussion
Yep I get that feeling as well as lad.
People who can't see a world class keeper in Reina, a world class centre half in Carragher and quite possibly Agger, a world class midfielder in Mascherano and Gerrard as well as a world class in Torres.
Silly me eh, what world class players all over the park do we have?
Anybody gonna take me up on the bet the reply is "what about the wide areas?"?
s@int wrote:I won't argue with you about the role that Keane plays other than to say I disagree.(for me he is a forward that drops deep rather than a creative second striker like the others you name). I do agree that he wasn't the player that we needed and that if we hadn't made that mistake it could have made all the difference in the world to our season.
However if we needed a top player last season to suppliment Torres and Gerrard, surely we still need one now? Yes we can gamble on Torres and Gerrard both remaining injury free and that Wash, Voronin and Babel can fill in for the odd game, but I would feel much happier if we had the right player waiting in the wings.......... just in case!
Nando26 wrote:baldricks_cunning_plan wrote:bigmick wrote:baldricks_cunning_plan wrote:The same thing is happening at Anfield. Rafa hates losing and won't allow his players to lose anymore, very rarely will you see a Liverpool side give up the fight. And we have world class players all over the park.
Sometimes you just get the feeling that you're too far apart with somebody to have a meaningful discussion
Yep I get that feeling as well as lad.
People who can't see a world class keeper in Reina, a world class centre half in Carragher and quite possibly Agger, a world class midfielder in Mascherano and Gerrard as well as a world class in Torres.
Silly me eh, what world class players all over the park do we have?
Anybody gonna take me up on the bet the reply is "what about the wide areas?"?
I know what you mean mate
Its like people wont be happy until we have world class players in every position in the squad
Its never been that way even Liverpools best teams had players in fans werent happy about & itll always be that way
some people wont the world i tell you
baldricks_cunning_plan wrote:s@int wrote:I won't argue with you about the role that Keane plays other than to say I disagree.(for me he is a forward that drops deep rather than a creative second striker like the others you name). I do agree that he wasn't the player that we needed and that if we hadn't made that mistake it could have made all the difference in the world to our season.
However if we needed a top player last season to suppliment Torres and Gerrard, surely we still need one now? Yes we can gamble on Torres and Gerrard both remaining injury free and that Wash, Voronin and Babel can fill in for the odd game, but I would feel much happier if we had the right player waiting in the wings.......... just in case!
Firstly I'd just start by saying I don't like all these new fancy phrases in modern football. Second striker, defensive midfielder. A forward is a forward, a midfielder is a midfielder, a defender is a defender and a keeper is a keeper. So for me Keane was a forward who liked to drop off as were the others I mentioned, in my opinion, but fair enough if you think they played a different role. Got no problem with that, other than I think it's another phrase invented to make a simple game even more complicated.
And secondly I agree. Last season Rafa decided we needed somebody in attack along with Stevie and Nando. Rafa, not Rick Parry as some might think, thought Keane was the answer as it turned out he wasn't. So it is probably safe to assume Rafa still thinks we need one now.
However last year we didn't have Voronin, this year we do. Now I'm not for one minute thinking Voronin is the answer or the best out there, but maybe that's why we're not going for somebody to play that role. Rafa tried the 4-4-2 last year, saw it worked to a point but the 4-2-3-1 gives us better options so he won't be looking to mess that up. Maybe Rafa thinks that if we need that kind of player, Voronin can do the job. I hope he isn't thinking that way, but he may be.
This again though comes back round to the point I made earlier to the lad who thinks we're "too far apart to have a meaningful conversation". Who realistically could we get to do the job instead of Voronin? I like Pacheco, but he's not yet ready so it means signing a player. Good players don't come cheap, Keane proved that last summer. So we're basically stuck.
s@int wrote:baldricks_cunning_plan wrote:s@int wrote:I won't argue with you about the role that Keane plays other than to say I disagree.(for me he is a forward that drops deep rather than a creative second striker like the others you name). I do agree that he wasn't the player that we needed and that if we hadn't made that mistake it could have made all the difference in the world to our season.
However if we needed a top player last season to suppliment Torres and Gerrard, surely we still need one now? Yes we can gamble on Torres and Gerrard both remaining injury free and that Wash, Voronin and Babel can fill in for the odd game, but I would feel much happier if we had the right player waiting in the wings.......... just in case!
Firstly I'd just start by saying I don't like all these new fancy phrases in modern football. Second striker, defensive midfielder. A forward is a forward, a midfielder is a midfielder, a defender is a defender and a keeper is a keeper. So for me Keane was a forward who liked to drop off as were the others I mentioned, in my opinion, but fair enough if you think they played a different role. Got no problem with that, other than I think it's another phrase invented to make a simple game even more complicated.
And secondly I agree. Last season Rafa decided we needed somebody in attack along with Stevie and Nando. Rafa, not Rick Parry as some might think, thought Keane was the answer as it turned out he wasn't. So it is probably safe to assume Rafa still thinks we need one now.
However last year we didn't have Voronin, this year we do. Now I'm not for one minute thinking Voronin is the answer or the best out there, but maybe that's why we're not going for somebody to play that role. Rafa tried the 4-4-2 last year, saw it worked to a point but the 4-2-3-1 gives us better options so he won't be looking to mess that up. Maybe Rafa thinks that if we need that kind of player, Voronin can do the job. I hope he isn't thinking that way, but he may be.
This again though comes back round to the point I made earlier to the lad who thinks we're "too far apart to have a meaningful conversation". Who realistically could we get to do the job instead of Voronin? I like Pacheco, but he's not yet ready so it means signing a player. Good players don't come cheap, Keane proved that last summer. So we're basically stuck.
I sadly agree mate. I posted in another thread that the problem is the players that will come are probably either too expensive or just not good enough, especially in a World Cup year when EVERYONE wants to be playing rather than warming a bench.
Players that it would be worth changing our formation for such as Villa we can't afford, while the rest know that they will get few chances while Gerrard and Torres are fit. Maybe we could go for a plan "b" type player , someone like Crouch who can come on and change the focus when needed.
We should have gambled on Owen
LFC2007 wrote:baldricks_cunning_plan wrote:However last year we didn't have Voronin, this year we do.
bigmick wrote:It's rare for me but I just can't be bothered to be totally truthfulNobodies got their "knives out for the manager" BTW, my concern is that he isn't been given the money to fill the glaringly obvious holes in the squad. At least I think they're glaringly obvious anyway
. Perhaps Masherano and Martin Skyrtel taking it in turns at right back is what some people think title challenges are made of, or David N'Gog on his own up front, but we'll just have to agree to differ.
As I say though leaving all of that stuff aside, it's fairly clear to me that the manager isn't being supported sufficiently in his transfer dealings and that's a major worry.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 63 guests