by jim_morrison_supported_liverpool » Thu Nov 18, 2004 11:15 am
Bit silly this thread really.
are we trying to say that we should be getting the same results with no first choice strikers, as we would with them in the team? given the fact that we dont always win even when we have our first choice strikers out there. surely this is at a disadvantage when they're not there at all?
and that thing about excuses is abit silly aswell. PLain and simply, you cant expect Liverpool to do as well without any first choice strikers, as would with them available.
if you do expect them to as good then you are saying that you would be happy with a strike force of Mellor/Pongolle/Kewell/Garcia in whatever partnership.
Even when we had Cisse and Baros fit, we're all agreed we need another striker to make us BETTER, that must mean without one we are WORSE, and that must mean that without ANY, we are EVEN WORSE.
But i do agree that the players should give 150% in these next games, to give us a good chance of winning.
its not the chilli sauce on kebabs that give you ring-sting, its the actual meat. had one without chilli, and still had ring-sting. the chilli's only there to mask the nonsense they stuff inside that bread.