Liverpool FC Forum

[A.B.]

Stop with the Manure bullsh!t, they spent 30 million on a player that is not worth that much. If Everton had money they would had settled for 10 million.

Its time that you stopped the manure bull AB, they paid £30m, on the drip to Everton, who could have got £50m for a lad who WILL be the greatest player this country has ever produced.

Just cus you are an LFC fan does not mean you have to hate everything about Man U and Everton.

I dislike them when we play them and I want them to lose all the time, but when they have good players, or play well sometimes you hjust have to take your hat off and applaud the opposition.

Do you think Bestie was ****** or over rated, or maybe that the 1986-87 Everton league winning team was rubbish?

Get over it.

Who are you kidding? Everton wanted a large amount of money for two reasons:
1. They lack money
2. Rooney is English

English players are overpriced these days. You are telling me that buying Rooney means that he is a guranteed profit. Manchester United could had bought Rooney for less than 15 million but Everton need the money and want Rooney to be worth more than Drogba so they overpriced him.

[Leonmc0708]

Manchester United could had bought Rooney for less than 15 million but Everton need the money and want Rooney to be worth more for Drogba so they overpriced him.

You What?

[A.B.]

You What? Nice response

[Leonmc0708]

You What? Nice response

"Everton need the money and want him to be worth more for Drogba"

Am I to presume then that Didier Drogba was his agent, or was on commision when Man U bought him?

[maximus]

Stop with the Manure bullsh!t, they spent 30 million on a player that is not worth that much. If Everton had money they would had settled for 10 million.

Its time that you stopped the manure bull AB, they paid £30m, on the drip to Everton, who could have got £50m for a lad who WILL be the greatest player this country has ever produced.

Just cus you are an LFC fan does not mean you have to hate everything about Man U and Everton.

I dislike them when we play them and I want them to lose all the time, but when they have good players, or play well sometimes you hjust have to take your hat off and applaud the opposition.

Do you think Bestie was ****** or over rated, or maybe that the 1986-87 Everton league winning team was rubbish?

Get over it.

Who are you kidding? Everton wanted a large amount of money for two reasons:
1. They lack money
2. Rooney is English

English players are overpriced these days. You are telling me that buying Rooney means that he is a guranteed profit. Manchester United could had bought Rooney for less than 15 million but Everton need the money and want Rooney to be worth more than Drogba so they overpriced him.

If Manu COULD have bought Rooney for less than 15 million, ffs why didn't they ??

[Leonmc0708]

Stop with the Manure bullsh!t, they spent 30 million on a player that is not worth that much. If Everton had money they would had settled for 10 million.

Its time that you stopped the manure bull AB, they paid £30m, on the drip to Everton, who could have got £50m for a lad who WILL be the greatest player this country has ever produced.

Just cus you are an LFC fan does not mean you have to hate everything about Man U and Everton.

I dislike them when we play them and I want them to lose all the time, but when they have good players, or play well sometimes you hjust have to take your hat off and applaud the opposition.

Do you think Bestie was ****** or over rated, or maybe that the 1986-87 Everton league winning team was rubbish?

Get over it.

Who are you kidding? Everton wanted a large amount of money for two reasons:
1. They lack money
2. Rooney is English

English players are overpriced these days. You are telling me that buying Rooney means that he is a guranteed profit. Manchester United could had bought Rooney for less than 15 million but Everton need the money and want Rooney to be worth more than Drogba so they overpriced him.

If Manu COULD have bought Rooney for less than 15 million, ffs why didn't they ??

Stop agreeing with me or Anfield girl and Roberts will kick off again ...

[A.B.]

You What? Nice response

"Everton need the money and want him to be worth more for Drogba"

Am I to presume then that Didier Drogba was his agent, or was on commision when Man U bought him?

My mistake mate, instead of "more for Drogba" it should be "more than Drogba", keyboard is really messed up.


Maximus I think you failed to realize what I'm saying. If Everton had the money Rooney would had been sold for under 15 million but because they lack a huge amount of money at the moment they raised the price of their main player.

If Everton were in a better financial situation Rooney wouldn't be priced at 30 million. A player with more bookings than goals scored is not worth that much even if he has a bright future.

[maximus]

Stop with the Manure bullsh!t, they spent 30 million on a player that is not worth that much. If Everton had money they would had settled for 10 million.

Its time that you stopped the manure bull AB, they paid £30m, on the drip to Everton, who could have got £50m for a lad who WILL be the greatest player this country has ever produced.

Just cus you are an LFC fan does not mean you have to hate everything about Man U and Everton.

I dislike them when we play them and I want them to lose all the time, but when they have good players, or play well sometimes you hjust have to take your hat off and applaud the opposition.

Do you think Bestie was ****** or over rated, or maybe that the 1986-87 Everton league winning team was rubbish?

Get over it.

Who are you kidding? Everton wanted a large amount of money for two reasons:
1. They lack money
2. Rooney is English

English players are overpriced these days. You are telling me that buying Rooney means that he is a guranteed profit. Manchester United could had bought Rooney for less than 15 million but Everton need the money and want Rooney to be worth more than Drogba so they overpriced him.

If Manu COULD have bought Rooney for less than 15 million, ffs why didn't they ??

Stop agreeing with me or Anfield girl and Roberts will kick off again ...

STOP READING MY MIND THEN !!  <<------- Leon

[A.B.]

Well Leon it has been a long time since the last arguement we had hasn't it

[anfieldadorer]

Stop with the Manure bullsh!t, they spent 30 million on a player that is not worth that much. If Everton had money they would had settled for 10 million.

Its time that you stopped the manure bull AB, they paid £30m, on the drip to Everton, who could have got £50m for a lad who WILL be the greatest player this country has ever produced.

Just cus you are an LFC fan does not mean you have to hate everything about Man U and Everton.

I dislike them when we play them and I want them to lose all the time, but when they have good players, or play well sometimes you hjust have to take your hat off and applaud the opposition.

Do you think Bestie was ****** or over rated, or maybe that the 1986-87 Everton league winning team was rubbish?

Get over it.

Who are you kidding? Everton wanted a large amount of money for two reasons:
1. They lack money
2. Rooney is English

English players are overpriced these days. You are telling me that buying Rooney means that he is a guranteed profit. Manchester United could had bought Rooney for less than 15 million but Everton need the money and want Rooney to be worth more than Drogba so they overpriced him.

If Manu COULD have bought Rooney for less than 15 million, ffs why didn't they ??

Stop agreeing with me or Anfield girl and Roberts will kick off again ...

STOP READING MY MIND THEN !!  <<------- Leon

leon-ab-maximus connection starts building pyramide again 

[spud]

If Everton were in a better financial situation Rooney wouldn't be priced at 30 million.

A.B. - I understand your point, but don't agree.

I don't think players values are driven by the amount the selling club has in the bank.

Prices are driven by the market, age, potential, contract term, etc.

Yes, Everton wanted as much as they could, but all clubs want this.

If this was the case, Leeds Utd (who were in the s-h-@-t) would have got much more for Keane, Kewell, Dacourt, Bowyer, Paul Robinson, etc?

[A.B.]

Stop with the Manure bullsh!t, they spent 30 million on a player that is not worth that much. If Everton had money they would had settled for 10 million.

Its time that you stopped the manure bull AB, they paid £30m, on the drip to Everton, who could have got £50m for a lad who WILL be the greatest player this country has ever produced.

Just cus you are an LFC fan does not mean you have to hate everything about Man U and Everton.

I dislike them when we play them and I want them to lose all the time, but when they have good players, or play well sometimes you hjust have to take your hat off and applaud the opposition.

Do you think Bestie was ****** or over rated, or maybe that the 1986-87 Everton league winning team was rubbish?

Get over it.

Who are you kidding? Everton wanted a large amount of money for two reasons:
1. They lack money
2. Rooney is English

English players are overpriced these days. You are telling me that buying Rooney means that he is a guranteed profit. Manchester United could had bought Rooney for less than 15 million but Everton need the money and want Rooney to be worth more than Drogba so they overpriced him.

If Manu COULD have bought Rooney for less than 15 million, ffs why didn't they ??

Stop agreeing with me or Anfield girl and Roberts will kick off again ...

STOP READING MY MIND THEN !!  <<------- Leon

leon-ab-maximus connection starts building pyramide again 

[A.B.]

If Everton were in a better financial situation Rooney wouldn't be priced at 30 million.

A.B. - I understand your point, but don't agree.

I don't think players values are driven by the amount the selling club has in the bank.

Prices are driven by the market, age, potential, contract term, etc.

Yes, Everton wanted as much as they could, but all clubs want this.

If this was the case, Leeds Utd (who were in the s-h-@-t) would have got much more for Keane, Kewell, Dacourt, Bowyer, Paul Robinson, etc?

So you think that 30 million isn't a bit too much for a player that has been booked more than he has scored goals?

[stmichael]

the fact of the matter is that everton received approximately £17m upfront with the rest coming in installments at a later date. at the end of the day we are talking about the biggest talent this country has produced since gazza. everton were always entitled to get as much money as they could for him. to prove a point, everton laughed off newcastle's original £20m bid as "ludicrous".

[taff]

30 million is a lot but your only worth what someone is prepared to pay.  Im sure Everton would have wanted more if they could have got away with it or if Madrid had offered 35 mill for example