Liverpool FC Forum

[Benny The Noon]

Has accepted the charge.

Source?

BBC

[lakes10]

but he says it should be not longer that a 3 game ban, the fa wish to make it longer.

[The Good Yank]

Make it 4 and move on.  With an additional 3 matches if he doesn't complete an anger management course.

[devaney]

Has accepted the charge.

Source?

BBC

Kinnell BTG are you still on your Suarez castigation mission !!!!!
9185 posts (mostly boring negative self righteous offensive cr.ap) and you actually call me a keyboard warrior. I don't know what sort of life you have but you have been on this thread for the last two days stating what should and shouldn't happen. You sir are a hypocrytical moron and I have no need or desire to go back through this thread as I know exactly what you said.

[supersub]

[quote="[url=http://www.liverpoolfc-newkit.co.uk/viewtopic.php?p=1203336#p1203336]

heimdall » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:19 pm[/urlI can understand a punch being thrown, a nasty tackle or even a headbutt as retaliation, although I don't condone it, but biting, and lets not forget he meant to cause harmAre you?
Do you really condone or understand a grown man biting another? Not sure what your background is but biting is not something a man does.

You are so right! We should let players get away with murder because it's "manlier". Bitchy biters should be banned for life, simply because that's what women do and not men.

I admire the flawless logic some of you people posses.[/quote][/quote]


thread gets more bizarre by the minute
biting is so girly that it should be punishable by 8 -10 game ban......breaking legs is a butch approach to footy therefore 3 games is plenty( we need the thugs on the pitch to keep the manly appeal

[Benny The Noon]

Source?

BBC

Kinnell BTG are you still on your Suarez castigation mission !!!!!
9185 posts (mostly boring negative self righteous offensive cr.ap) and you actually call me a keyboard warrior. I don't know what sort of life you have but you have been on this thread for the last two days stating what should and shouldn't happen. You sir are a hypocrytical moron and I have no need or desire to go back through this thread as I know exactly what you said.

All that because I said BBC

[Thommo's perm]

Shouldnt have accepted it. Theyve got a cheek saying that 3 games is not enough
Fu'ck the FA!

[Benny The Noon]

So you think that Suarez should have denied the charge despite evidence that proves his guilt

Please don't become a lawyer.

Taking the FA on will result in only one winner and it won't be us.

[Thommo's perm]

So you think that Suarez should have denied the charge despite evidence that proves his guilt

Please don't become a lawyer.

Taking the FA on will result in only one winner and it won't be us.

He could have argued that they were acting unfairly by refusing to give him a 3 match ban. Then again pr'icks like you would have insisted they ban him for longer if they had. You have already stated ad nauseum that you support the FA and you hope Suarez gets banned for a long time
Your glee at this is sickening if you are a RED, but this is obviously questionable due to your comments
Fu'ck the FA and its supporters

[Benny The Noon]

You really do miss the point don't you

By arguing against the FA the chances are the ban would be even longer. By accepting the charge ( which is correct ) you stand a better chance of not getting the ban extended.

No one is happy about this - you can be incredibly dense at times.

Sometimes it's easier to play the system - take the punishment and move on.

[Thommo's perm]

You really do miss the point don't you

By arguing against the FA the chances are the ban would be even longer. By accepting the charge ( which is correct ) you stand a better chance of not getting the ban extended.

No one is happy about this - you can be incredibly dense at times.

Sometimes it's easier to play the system - take the punishment and move on.

Oh do fu'ck off you boring bell hend
You were talking about him deserving a hefty ban because you believed it was correct, not because it was playing the system.
You are happy about this because it justifies your crime and punishment philosophy which is proven not to work
Anyway its just been on the news that although he accepts the violent conduct charge he doesnt agree with more than a 3 match ban, so will be appealing!
Haha up your Fu*king ar'se FA lover!!

[Benny The Noon]

Christ you really are a first class tool

I wonder if you will be so happy when they extend the ban considerably because he didnt agree with it being over 3 games. It proven that fighting the FA doesn't work - but you are either blinded by your "rehab" method or just plain thick to realise that. We will prob lose Suarez for even longer now - enjoy your celebrations.

Suarez getting banned is correct - it's a punishment that fits what he did - it's only clueless clowns that can't see that - so you fit right in.

[Thommo's perm]

Christ you really are a first class tool

I wonder if you will be so happy when they extend the ban considerably because he didnt agree with it being over 3 games. It proven that fighting the FA doesn't work - but you are either blinded by your "rehab" method or just plain thick to realise that. We will prob lose Suarez for even longer now - enjoy your celebrations.

Suarez getting banned is correct - it's a punishment that fits what he did - it's only clueless clowns that can't see that - so you fit right in.

He is either guilty of violent conduct of he isnt.
No-one has been injured, Ivanovic has said he wants no further action to be taken, the police arent involved. Yet the corrupt and spiteful FA want to hang Suarez out to dry and you advocate us going along with that. If they extend the ban it wont be because theyre right or fair, it will be because they are wicked. I am happy that he is standing up for himself against injustice, not because he is innocent, but because he wants to be treated fairly.
If you believe they would have treated him more leniently if he would have accepted the charge, even though they stated that 3 games was "clearly insufficient", then you are probably the most Fu*king thick cu'nt I have ever had the pleasure to communicate with. So you carry on with youre FA ar'selicking comments about a punishment that fits and leave Liverpool supporters to get behind one of our players.

[damjan193]

[quote="[url=http://www.liverpoolfc-newkit.co.uk/viewtopic.php?p=1203336#p1203336]

heimdall » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:19 pm[/urlI can understand a punch being thrown, a nasty tackle or even a headbutt as retaliation, although I don't condone it, but biting, and lets not forget he meant to cause harmAre you?
Do you really condone or understand a grown man biting another? Not sure what your background is but biting is not something a man does.

You are so right! We should let players get away with murder because it's "manlier". Bitchy biters should be banned for life, simply because that's what women do and not men.

I admire the flawless logic some of you people posses.

[/quote]


thread gets more bizarre by the minute
biting is so girly that it should be punishable by 8 -10 game ban......breaking legs is a butch approach to footy therefore 3 games is plenty( we need the thugs on the pitch to keep the manly appeal [/quote]
I hope you are being sarcastic, as was I

[red till i die!!]

i really hope tomorrows verdict isnt the end of luis career with us.
he has stated he would think anymore than 3 matches would be excessive but id say he is secretly hoping its no more than 5. if his ban is extreme to the point that he misses a chunk of next season then id say he'd decide he has had enough of the prem.
5 matches and maybe another 3 suspended depending on future offences, imo would send out a decent message from the f.a, but a cantona style ban would just prove they have an agenda against him.
id like to believe that this incident will deter any clubs interested but it wont at all and if he carries his form through to the confederations cup then he'l rip it up and the list of suitors will grow.
gonna be a long summer with his future in the air