Rumour of the day - For the miserable tw@ts amongst you

Liverpool Football Club - The Rumour Mill

Postby Kenny Kan » Mon Aug 06, 2012 2:17 pm

Weren't we interested in Quasi a few years back when Rafa was in charge?

BTW, Agger to Barca, you heard it here second.
Champions of England 2020.

YNWA
User avatar
Kenny Kan
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 4140
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:28 am
Location: Footballing heaven

Postby Roger Red Hat » Mon Aug 06, 2012 3:16 pm

ICE-MAN » Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:27 pm wrote:Nooo! Don't sign queresma, he's dreadful! A moody portugeuse who's never cut it at the top level! 8m for him when we could get a proven premiership and more hungry attacker in Dempsey for another 4-5m!


you'd rather sign Dempsey than Queresma? really?
Sex, drugs and sausage rolls!
User avatar
Roger Red Hat
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7669
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:59 am
Location: Yorkshire

Postby paisleyred » Mon Aug 06, 2012 3:22 pm

I would.
Dempsey has proven he can score goals in the prem.
User avatar
paisleyred
 
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: paisley

Postby ICE-MAN » Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:39 pm

Absolutely I would! Dempsey is a proven premiership goal scorer and attacking threat and has been for the past few seasons! Queresma had bags of potential but never lived up to it, his better spells were in the portugeuse and Turkish leagues and he's only a yr younger than Dempsey!

Don't get fooled but queresma's fancy step overs every now and again!!!

There's no comparison between the players!
User avatar
ICE-MAN
 
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 3:53 pm

Postby Benny The Noon » Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:17 pm

I would as well - Quasrma or how ever you spell it has done f*ck all in his career and hasnt got anywhwre near his own hype.
Benny The Noon
 

Postby damjan193 » Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:21 pm

Quaresma would be a bad signing. I'd rather have some one else, but if I had to pick between Quaresma and Dempsey I'd chose Dempsey.

Anyway, I heard that City are offering 20m for Agger and that they'll offer him 100.000 in wages. As far as I know, Agger said he's happy here and that he'll never go to our rivals, but if we do sell him, I'd rather we sold him to Barca.
damjan193
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 8772
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 10:25 pm

Postby shanks » Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:25 pm

if i remember rightly  Quaresma didnt impress me when he was @ Chelsea on loan 2009  :no
User avatar
shanks
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:49 pm

Postby Benny The Noon » Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:28 pm

shanks » Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:25 pm wrote:if i remember rightly  Quaresma didnt impress me when he was @ Chelsea on loan 2009  :no


Thats because he hardly played and when he did he did f*ck all
Benny The Noon
 

Postby metalhead » Mon Aug 06, 2012 10:12 pm

Quaresma is overrated, flopped big time at Barcelona
ImageImageImage
User avatar
metalhead
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 17476
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Milan, Italy

Postby Roger Red Hat » Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:11 am

Jordan Rhodes from Huddersfield...   Blackburn are in for him and lets face it he knows where the onion bag is!
Sex, drugs and sausage rolls!
User avatar
Roger Red Hat
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7669
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:59 am
Location: Yorkshire

Postby Penguins » Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:26 am

Why can't we stay away from british players from midtableclubs?
Allen for me is just another in the line of Caroll, Henderson, Adam etc.
Is he better? Perhaps but the thing is you will always have to massivly overpay for such players.
20 million? You're having a laugh...
The Newcastle way is the only way
Penguins
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 2615
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 4:25 am

Postby ken_job » Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:53 am

Quaresma is a show pony.

I reckon we should forget all other targets and go all out for Dzeko. We likely couldnt afford his wages etc but he'd be lethal in a front three of borini, dzeko, suarez.

Our midfield doesnt need allen, our defence is settled and doesnt need tinkering - lets focus on our main weakness and thats goals.
ken_job
 
Posts: 278
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 7:51 pm

Postby maypaxvobiscum » Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:30 am

"Joe is worth a lot of money," Laudrup said.

"Their manager knows if he wants to change the way Liverpool play he needs a midfielder like Joe who is young and can play at the highest level.

"We saw they bought a couple of midfielders in the last few years for a lot of money but Joe is on a level above.

"If one is worth £17 million then he is worth more, perhaps £20 million or so."


LOL
User avatar
maypaxvobiscum
 
Posts: 9665
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:02 am
Location: Singapore

Postby burjennio » Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:32 am

They're talkin £15m for Joe Allen, while Arsenal have just paid out £16 for Santi Carzola, a proven match winner, playmaker who can both create and score from midfield and a dead ball specialist to boot - WHY CAN NO ONE ON THE LIVERPOOL SCOUTING BOARD GET THEIR HEAD OUT OF THEIR *****??
User avatar
burjennio
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:17 pm
Location: belfast

Postby maximus » Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:39 am

Joe allen is 21 and is ready made to carry out brendan rogers way of playing, for that you will have to pay a premium (unfortunately) I do not know why people cannot get their head round it!!
User avatar
maximus
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 1:17 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Rumour Mill

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e