NEW STADIUM - All News + discussion here

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby Reg » Sun May 17, 2009 6:22 pm

boodiddy1 wrote:i wonder if the yanks have thought of selling bricks to fans for the new stadium? This would generate a hellof a lot of money if they were to sell bricks at £50 each with yuor name engraved on it which you would the see when you travelled to the new stadium.

I reckon they could generate circa 30 million.

Its not a new idea, my mother bought a brick at Wigan's ground about 60 years ago!

Its a worthwhile cash raising method and IMHO is worth a go.

I'd pay if it meant we got the 70,000 seater instead of the 60,000.
User avatar
Reg
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13722
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 12:24 am
Location: Singapore

Postby SundanceKid » Sun May 17, 2009 7:23 pm

Living in America, I might not be able to see it anyway haha. I wish to move to Liverpool someday but moving to a different country isn't easy. And I hate CCTVs
"Cut my veins open and I bleed Liverpool red"
Image
User avatar
SundanceKid
 
Posts: 461
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:39 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Postby ste123lfc » Sun May 17, 2009 7:41 pm

boodiddy1 wrote:i wonder if the yanks have thought of selling bricks to fans for the new stadium? This would generate a hellof a lot of money if they were to sell bricks at £50 each with yuor name engraved on it which you would the see when you travelled to the new stadium.

I reckon they could generate circa 30 million.

They did that at Sunderland when they built the 'Stadium of Sh*te'. Everyone who bought a brick has their name on it and a certificate saying exactly where it is on the ground.
From Shankly to Brendan we follow our team, Rome to Istanbul we've all lived the dream. Our journey is long, our goal stays the same, to keep for our children the famous red name.
User avatar
ste123lfc
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 802
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 3:53 pm

Postby johnsouthwales » Tue May 19, 2009 4:59 pm

i dont like the new stadium. maybe i get used to it one day. i got a bad omen about it.  the kops the wrong way round to start with.

i didnt look at it this way before, no wonder they don't want to call the stadium anfield cos it means that they lose the stadium sponsorship cash!  100m for ten years? we get 80m for ten years with a shirt sponsor never mind the ground.. that money should last around 3-4 seasons worth for transfers and that means we spent the cash and not even halfway through.

i reckon they got it in the wrong place.

lmao have u seen the steve martin film the jerk?? when the truck drove off pulling the church?  imagine doing that with the anfield and just literally drag it straight across the road and youd have the kop grandstand next to the pavement on anfield road itself.  push it in a bit to get some space and a concourse.  easy innit.. and they can still call it anfield road as a business address cos its ermm still is on anfield road and not in the middle of stanley park and legetimately call it anfield. 

if we only knew in 1991 and 1994 what was going to happen.  they could have gone a bit higher on the centenary stand and done a fuller job instead of just adding onto the kemlyn.  that could have brought in an extra 1000-2000.

gone a bit higher on the kopgrandstand in 1994 and slightly closer to the pitch, bit wider from half way up instead of square and flush like how the old kop used to be with wings. could have rought in another 1000 or two.  but the main stand would have needed some alteration and it would have been a good idea to have worked on that before the kop.  that could have pushed anfield to 47,500 to 49,500  plus the mainstand extension.  even if the mainstand wasnt worked on, would 49,000 been enough?

anfield in 1978 had 52,318 capacity.  biggest capacity i had been in was 51,092 against spurs november 1979.  manutds ground held 58,500 .. arsenal had 60,000 ... in competative terms so to speak, we were 6-8thousand behind.  so a smaller ground won more trophies..

what we did was extended the kemlyn to become the centenary stand and had match days when work was halted.  manutd closed stretford end completely for the season, sacrificing their income for a season.  and because of their location to start with, didnt have any prevention of expansion or planning restrictions.

they now got 77,000 which is awesome, even though the top tier view is miniscule.  lol, i had vertigo when i had a seat for the upper centenary stand a while back.  what manutd did recently was the quadangles.   now arsenal have up sticks to more across the road.  their new ground is more or less what the old highbury was in capacity.   

do we really need 70,000?  remember in the mid 80s when attendances were low?  and you could stand on the kop for two pound.  but it was the seats that suffered rather than the kop.  and if i remember right, main stand seats were about a pound fifty more expensive than the kop enterance.  wasn't there a crowd of 10,500 at one time? have to check the old programmes for that one.  i remember the european cup tie against oulun palloseera sept 1981, hardly anyone in the kemlyn stands, and the other game i went to against cska sofia march 1981, most of the kemlyn was empty.  lots of matches in the mid 80's were like this, and if i also remember right, some matches in 1995 were half full centenary.  could lay down and stretch legs out on the lower tier.

if the demand for tickets as they have always been exceeded as usual, and if 10,000 people are waiting for 2 years for season tickets, what happens when another 10,000 in 5 years time come onto the scene after the 60,000 stadium gets built?  how many postal applications get declined every home match?  it'll be never ending

42,000 home supporters at present.  say 5,000 postal applications get turned down.  does 5,000 justify 60,000 or 63,000? and like it has been said, with a bigger stadium can actually result in a decrease in season tickets to become a pick and choose which games they go to situation.  the only solution to fill the 60,000 will be 42,000 plus the 5,000 who can't get tickets, 3,000 for the visting supporters, put the 10,000 waiting for season tickets straight in, and an extra 3,000 tickets available onto credit credit/debit card sales.


i remember paying a pound to stand on the kop. then it went uo to one pound ten.. in 1988-89, you could stand on the kop for £3.50, £4 in 1989-90.

1994 it was £14 for a seat on the kopgrandstand, and if i remember right, LFC said they won't be putting up price.  and if there were, they'd be minimal..

today prices have literally shot through the roof..  for a seat, i'd have to pay approx 20% of income for a seat.  if i was taking home £400, then a seat will be 10%.. do you know many who take home £400 a week?  in 1994,  a kopgrandstand seat was 10% of pay.  1989, kop enterance was about 3% of income.   if seats went up a pound a year since 1994, kopgrandstand would be now £28 a match for this season.

if u were unemployed in the early 80's, you could go and watch a match, a pound or two pound still equated to around 5% of income. and many people did.  i doubt very much if someone who is unemployed these days can afford a seat at todays prices on £60.50 a week jsa, which makes that around 66% of income.

not only unemployed are affected, part time and low incomes get hammered.  even someone on a part time wage is affected, take home £100 its 40%. take home £200 and its around 20% of income.

it'll be very interesting what the projected ticket prices will be for the new stadium.  we shall wait and see
johnsouthwales
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 3:00 am
Location: southwales

Postby J*o*n*D*o*e » Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:44 pm

Liverpool confirm new stadium delays to continue

The current financial climate is continuing to delay work on Liverpool’s proposed new 60,000 seater stadium, the club’s managing director Christian Purslow confirmed today.

The club’s co-owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett have faced heavy criticism after promising work would start straight away following their takeover of the club in February 2007.

But almost a decade after plans were first announced to build the new stadium on Stanley Park, just yards from the current Anfield stadium, there is yet a “spade in the ground”.

“Construction on the stadium will begin when the current contraction in the banking industry ends and the global financial markets re-establish their equilibrium,” said Purslow.

“The centerpiece is to deliver a world-class football ground that everyone can be proud of, a new home for the club with a stadium of at least 60,000 seats, giving the best possible match experience.

Liverpool risk being left behind financially from the revenue made by rival clubs due to their higher capacity stadiums.

Manchester United can now hold over 76,000 fans in Old Trafford whilst Arsenal’s Emirates Stadium holds 60,000 supporters.


http://www.thisisanfield.com/2009....ontinue

The only good thing about not having the stadium go ahead is the fact them 2 tw@ts will make nothing unless they do build it.
Image
ImageImage
User avatar
J*o*n*D*o*e
 
Posts: 2355
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:20 pm
Location: Liverpool

Postby Reg » Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:18 am

This is untenable, its a disaster.

See it from a different angle... Gerrard, Carra, Torres will never play in the New Anfield, Rafa wont probably be around to lead the team out on that first saturday either. Dont you think THEY feel betrayed, dont you think they were signing contract extensions because of the promises of glory, the new stadium, money for signings.... and now?

I feel to some extent all the players are just taking the money now, the owners wont go, we wont get our stadium, we wont have a proper transfer budget and we'll be forever paying off this impossible debt.

The soul of the club is at stake.
Last edited by Reg on Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Reg
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13722
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 12:24 am
Location: Singapore

Postby Madmax » Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:28 am

These two clowns p.iss me off.. Finacially we will always have problems with them and i could see us selling players in order to fund for more in the future.. Could see macha being the next player going next season.. His warmed up to barca so anything is possible.
User avatar
Madmax
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 5:51 pm
Location: uk

Postby Woollyback » Sun Sep 06, 2009 8:48 pm

it's a complete shambles at the moment, although to be fair the timing wasn't the yanks fault - the credit crunch has meant that the funding they need to build it will cost them a whole lot more in interest than anybody could've forecast, and be a lot harder to come by as well. it's sad but it's gonna be a couple of years i reckon until any work even STARTS, so maybe another 5 until it's finished. but one thing's for sure we NEED more capacity - if old trafford holds just over 30,000 more than anfield, let's say on average £30 a ticket, united are gonna be bringing in around a million quid more than us in revenue for every single home game on gate receipts alone, plus there's 30,000 more people buying pies/shirts/posters/programmes etc etc

19 home league games, plus god knows how many cup games every season - i reckon they're bringing in at least £40m more than us every season just on matchday revenue alone     :(
b*ll*c*ks and s*i*e
User avatar
Woollyback
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12400
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 3:11 pm
Location: Manchester

Postby Penguins » Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:47 am

Please, the Credit Crunch now another excuse the next year.

The yanks can always blame something else. Now it is a recession so we can't build then when that ends the prices of raw materials will be too high and we will have to wait for the prices to go down. And so on and so on.

What is worse we will have ignorant supporters demanding Rafa's head for not winning after spending absolutley zero next summer again.

So what if we don't bring in half of what manure does on matchday?

We are LFC, we should win regardless. Sack the manager and the team. ZZZZZ....

We are really in the :censored: and only some stupid moron willing to pump up a fortune for 49 % of the club getting no actual say, because Hicks would never allow it, could save us.

But if nothing change then we will be on the outside the top 4 looking in and most supporters will only realiaze when it is way too late that we are in real trouble.

The facts are simple. Do we want to be a top team and continue to be a team competing for honours having world class players we must have a new stadium, no exceptions.
Penguins
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 2597
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 4:25 am

Postby Owzat » Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:35 pm

KennyisGod....still wrote:
boodiddy1 wrote:i wonder if the yanks have thought of selling bricks to fans for the new stadium? This would generate a hellof a lot of money if they were to sell bricks at £50 each with yuor name engraved on it which you would the see when you travelled to the new stadium.

I reckon they could generate circa 30 million.

Cuz knowin my luck my brick'd be so high up i'd need the hubble telescope to read the fecker!!!!!!!

Just go to a Millwall match, especially vs West Ham, and have one or more thrown at you gratis. They say there's a brick with your name on it
Never buy from PC World, product quality is poor and their 'customer service' is even poorer
User avatar
Owzat
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7487
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 8:55 am
Location: England

Postby Reg » Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:27 am

Tom Hicks hopes £100m Middle East investment drive will help fund Liverpool's new stadium

17th September 2009

Tom Hicks hopes to take a step nearer to funding a new stadium for Liverpool by raising around £100million from an investment drive in the Middle East.

The day after the announcement of an £80million four-year shirt sponsorship deal with Standard Chartered, the co-owner and his advisers are believed to be sounding out potential backers over buying a stake in the club, although this would not affect his and fellow owner fellow-owner George Gillett’s standing as major shareholders

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport....K4oHkMG
++

This could be just filling space in the sports pages.
User avatar
Reg
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13722
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 12:24 am
Location: Singapore

Postby boodiddy1 » Thu Nov 26, 2009 10:28 am

We have no money, for either stadium or players and everton are the same.

We are always going on about the yanks and rightly so. But, no-one could of predicted the world downturn was to be so bad. I'm glad DIC never took over us looking at how Dubai is really struggling and is now looking to Abu-Dhabi to bail it out.

Now, Everton have had there planning permission turned down. Is it really beyonds the realms of reality that we could groundshare.

Financially, it would be easier, costs halved and probably more because the council and local agencies would put in more money. We could then concentrate on improving the team.

Inter and AC do it. So lazio and roma and them two for me are more fanatical than our support in terms of extremism.  Bayern and 1860 also do it.

The answer really is why not? We can still make it our home, you do loads of things to keep it ours. Like i've sadi before Bayern change the Allianz stadium to red when they play. Also, have an area for the diehards, ie: singing element. We'd have a much bigger trophy cabinet, probably but theirs off them. Not like they need it. :D :D

We cant keep moaning and wailing at hard luck, both clubs and the city need to progress. And, the way things are just now, maybe this is the only alternative. The world cup would be nailed on, think of all the money coming in. We could have summer gigs at the stadium and get more money for it.

Also, we'd be able to stage major european finals. Imagine, us playing the UCL final at our stadium? the manc beaten in our back yard. Number six won at home. Magic
Image
User avatar
boodiddy1
 
Posts: 540
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: bolton

Postby Paul C » Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:05 pm

Are you having a f"ucking laugh! :angry:
User avatar
Paul C
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 6893
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 12:44 pm

Postby Ciggy » Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:20 pm

boodiddy1 wrote:We have no money, for either stadium or players and everton are the same.

We are always going on about the yanks and rightly so. But, no-one could of predicted the world downturn was to be so bad. I'm glad DIC never took over us looking at how Dubai is really struggling and is now looking to Abu-Dhabi to bail it out.

Now, Everton have had there planning permission turned down. Is it really beyonds the realms of reality that we could groundshare.

Financially, it would be easier, costs halved and probably more because the council and local agencies would put in more money. We could then concentrate on improving the team.

Inter and AC do it. So lazio and roma and them two for me are more fanatical than our support in terms of extremism.  Bayern and 1860 also do it.

The answer really is why not? We can still make it our home, you do loads of things to keep it ours. Like i've sadi before Bayern change the Allianz stadium to red when they play. Also, have an area for the diehards, ie: singing element. We'd have a much bigger trophy cabinet, probably but theirs off them. Not like they need it. :D :D

We cant keep moaning and wailing at hard luck, both clubs and the city need to progress. And, the way things are just now, maybe this is the only alternative. The world cup would be nailed on, think of all the money coming in. We could have summer gigs at the stadium and get more money for it.

Also, we'd be able to stage major european finals. Imagine, us playing the UCL final at our stadium? the manc beaten in our back yard. Number six won at home. Magic

No offence but fuck off !!!
There is no-one anywhere in the world at any stage who is any bigger or any better than this football club.

Kenny Dalglish 1/2/2011

REST IN PEACE PHIL, YOU WILL NEVER BE FORGOTTEN.
User avatar
Ciggy
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 26826
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:36 pm

Postby heimdall » Thu Nov 26, 2009 2:00 pm

boodiddy1 wrote:We have no money, for either stadium or players and everton are the same.

We are always going on about the yanks and rightly so. But, no-one could of predicted the world downturn was to be so bad. I'm glad DIC never took over us looking at how Dubai is really struggling and is now looking to Abu-Dhabi to bail it out.

Now, Everton have had there planning permission turned down. Is it really beyonds the realms of reality that we could groundshare.

Financially, it would be easier, costs halved and probably more because the council and local agencies would put in more money. We could then concentrate on improving the team.

Inter and AC do it. So lazio and roma and them two for me are more fanatical than our support in terms of extremism.  Bayern and 1860 also do it.

The answer really is why not? We can still make it our home, you do loads of things to keep it ours. Like i've sadi before Bayern change the Allianz stadium to red when they play. Also, have an area for the diehards, ie: singing element. We'd have a much bigger trophy cabinet, probably but theirs off them. Not like they need it. :D :D

We cant keep moaning and wailing at hard luck, both clubs and the city need to progress. And, the way things are just now, maybe this is the only alternative. The world cup would be nailed on, think of all the money coming in. We could have summer gigs at the stadium and get more money for it.

Also, we'd be able to stage major european finals. Imagine, us playing the UCL final at our stadium? the manc beaten in our back yard. Number six won at home. Magic

I think you have a very good point mate but like many others have said F off.  :D  :wwww
User avatar
heimdall
 
Posts: 4971
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:51 pm
Location: London

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 77 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e