god_bless_john_houlding wrote:look at the fella who mocked my theory the most...badbob...look who's wanted out most...badbob...now i see why he wasn't keen on the idea of democracy.
look at the canadians who've had anything to do with merseyside...radzinski (everton) iain hume (tranmere) badbob (liverpool) i wouldn't p!ss on any of them if truth be told.
Bad Bob wrote:god_bless_john_houlding wrote:look at the fella who mocked my theory the most...badbob...look who's wanted out most...badbob...now i see why he wasn't keen on the idea of democracy.
look at the canadians who've had anything to do with merseyside...radzinski (everton) iain hume (tranmere) badbob (liverpool) i wouldn't p!ss on any of them if truth be told.![]()
Sound--I'd prefer to remain p!ss free, ta.![]()
And, I'm not sure 4 votes against constitutes a non-confidence motion at this stage. Let's wait to hear from the other 790 members!
god_bless_john_houlding wrote:Bad Bob wrote:god_bless_john_houlding wrote:look at the fella who mocked my theory the most...badbob...look who's wanted out most...badbob...now i see why he wasn't keen on the idea of democracy.
look at the canadians who've had anything to do with merseyside...radzinski (everton) iain hume (tranmere) badbob (liverpool) i wouldn't p!ss on any of them if truth be told.![]()
Sound--I'd prefer to remain p!ss free, ta.![]()
And, I'm not sure 4 votes against constitutes a non-confidence motion at this stage. Let's wait to hear from the other 790 members!
7 votes 5 don't want you as a moderator anymore. My theory was give 2/3 voting days. This has nearly a fornight, therefore the majority should be taken and you should be removed as a moderator and make people very happy
s@int wrote:god_bless_john_houlding wrote:Bad Bob wrote:god_bless_john_houlding wrote:look at the fella who mocked my theory the most...badbob...look who's wanted out most...badbob...now i see why he wasn't keen on the idea of democracy.
look at the canadians who've had anything to do with merseyside...radzinski (everton) iain hume (tranmere) badbob (liverpool) i wouldn't p!ss on any of them if truth be told.![]()
Sound--I'd prefer to remain p!ss free, ta.![]()
And, I'm not sure 4 votes against constitutes a non-confidence motion at this stage. Let's wait to hear from the other 790 members!
7 votes 5 don't want you as a moderator anymore. My theory was give 2/3 voting days. This has nearly a fornight, therefore the majority should be taken and you should be removed as a moderator and make people very happy
I think the majority are the ones like me who couldn't be bothered voting John. Maybe if there had been an option to keep all the mods it would have attracted the most votes?
Bob is a good Mod, and like the other Mods is helpful and puts up with a lot of cr@p.
Maybe if we got 200 voting for him it would be worth discussing, but FIVE is just laughable mate.
I am pretty sure most of us would get a lot more than 5 votes against us in a poll and thats without us being mods.
god_bless_john_houlding wrote:Judge wrote:just so its fair and that democracy works![]()
![]()
felt sorry for GBJH
look at the fella who mocked my theory the most...badbob...look who's wanted out most...badbob...now i see why he wasn't keen on the idea of democracy.
look at the canadians who've had anything to do with merseyside...radzinski (everton) iain hume (tranmere) badbob (liverpool) i wouldn't p!ss on any of them if truth be told.
s@int wrote:god_bless_john_houlding wrote:Bad Bob wrote:god_bless_john_houlding wrote:look at the fella who mocked my theory the most...badbob...look who's wanted out most...badbob...now i see why he wasn't keen on the idea of democracy.
look at the canadians who've had anything to do with merseyside...radzinski (everton) iain hume (tranmere) badbob (liverpool) i wouldn't p!ss on any of them if truth be told.![]()
Sound--I'd prefer to remain p!ss free, ta.![]()
And, I'm not sure 4 votes against constitutes a non-confidence motion at this stage. Let's wait to hear from the other 790 members!
7 votes 5 don't want you as a moderator anymore. My theory was give 2/3 voting days. This has nearly a fornight, therefore the majority should be taken and you should be removed as a moderator and make people very happy
I think the majority are the ones like me who couldn't be bothered voting John. Maybe if there had been an option to keep all the mods it would have attracted the most votes?
Bob is a good Mod, and like the other Mods is helpful and puts up with a lot of cr@p.
Maybe if we got 200 voting for him it would be worth discussing, but FIVE is just laughable mate.
I am pretty sure most of us would get a lot more than 5 votes against us in a poll and thats without us being mods.
Return to Non Football Related Polls
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests