Liverpool FC Forum

by **slickrick** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:15 am

hopefully those who had crouch as their second choice striker will change their mind after tonight, the chap is useless, for a lad who's wha 6'5? - 6'6? he can't head the :censored:

ball, he can't tackle, he can't run, he's weak, he's :censored:

,
people need to cop on now and realise that crouch is :censored:

, he was never good enough to play for us and never will be, at least kuyt and voronin will work there bollox off for us, crouch is a lazy and jus plain :censored:

by **Smeg** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:00 am

He's

is Crouch...

:censored:

,

he is

...

absoloute

...

Can't :censored:

, can't

, just plain and utter :censored:

...

by **The_Rock** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 4:59 am

Like i said....i only rated torres and gerrard as strikers in our current team........

Rafa seems to only buy workhorse strikers......Do you think fowler, rush and owen would have played under rafa

by **Smeg** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:08 am

The_Rock wrote:Like i said....i only rated torres and gerrard as strikers in our current team........

Rafa seems to only buy workhorse strikers......Do you think fowler, rush and owen would have played under rafa

Robbie didn't play.

Kuyt was better than Robbie anyway...

People actually believed that... :laugh:

by **112-1077774096** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 6:14 am

Smeg wrote:Kuyt was better than Robbie anyway...

stu get to bed, you are speaking in tongues now

i know your joking, unless you mean kuyt is better than robbie earl, and even then thats debatable

by **Owzat** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 8:11 am

slickrick wrote:hopefully those who had crouch as their second choice striker will change their mind after tonight, the chap is useless, for a lad who's wha 6'5? - 6'6? he can't head the ball, he can't tackle, he can't run, he's weak, he's ,
people need to cop on now and realise that crouch is , he was never good enough to play for us and never will be, at least kuyt and voronin will work there bollox off for us, crouch is a lazy and jus plain

The worst thing about Crouch isn't actually entirely his fault - the way we play when he is in the team

2006/7

With Crouch - P6 W2 D3 L1 F6 A2 (Crouch has one goal)
Without Crouch - P6 W5 L1 L0 F16 A4

Coincidence? Given even when he's a sub it's as unlikely he will change the game and gain a win as it is equally unlikely he will come on and Liverpool dramatically lose, then those stats say it all

by **Dutchsky** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 8:14 am

Voronin, Crouch and Leto weren't very good.

I don't understand why Rafa didn't start with his best team.
Underestimating OM? Hoping home advantage would make up for the rotation-system?
Or has Rafa just given up on the CL and is going for the premiership as major goal?

by **Bammo** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 9:43 pm

Dutchsky wrote:Voronin, Crouch and Leto weren't very good.

I don't understand why Rafa didn't start with his best team.
Underestimating OM? Hoping home advantage would make up for the rotation-system?
Or has Rafa just given up on the CL and is going for the premiership as major goal?

It's probably a combination of Rafa underestimating OM and the main players for us playing :censored:

. Once again, the team that started should have been good enough to win. The players don't seem to be playing with confidence and it needs either a few lucky wins or a severe kick up the :censored:

to change things.

Liverpool FC Forum

Rate our strikers in your opinion and then in.....

Who is online