COME ON DOWN!!







peewee wrote:is stu learns to post without abusing people then he can post here, its quite simple, but the fact is he cant even perform that simple task.
it is possible for him to discuss without the abuse, he knew what would happen if he was even slightly abusive but he still chose to be abusive, blaming the mods here is wrong, i suggest you blame the one man who could have prevented his ban



I think Stu's record(history) has a lot to do with the low level of tolarance he was shown. He was warned about his future behaviour when he was allowed back. Stu is a very good poster but would be a lot better if he concentrated on commenting on peoples opinions, rather than their parentage or their sexual proclivaties.
dawson99 wrote:smeg. f'ck off tw@t. that enough for a warning now? do gooding emo's...
on here, its just a bit silly bolloc*ing Stu and not every other member, because everyone has a go at someone else at some point. 
, what the fk do you know about anything. If you knew anything at all you would know that what you just said is the biggest load of
seen on this site. Get a clue lad!!
me at all, but I won't take any of his points on board until he does the same, its common courtesy.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests