Liverpool FC Forum

by **76-1115222408** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:09 pm

No, this isnt a joking matter though St.Mick, it really isnt!!!! A completly innocent man was MURDERED, and they are trying to cover it up, we were feed misinformation from the get go, and it sickens me, because it happens all the time, but people fail to realise it!!! However, I DO!!!

by **Ciggy** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:11 pm

I find all this really strange cause when I was watching SKY news on that day, witnesses where saying he was legging it and even rolled off someones car whilst the police where chasing him?
Even them interviewed from the train said he was running, and had a big overcoat on in the middle of summer

by **76-1115222408** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:12 pm

BarryBelfast wrote:
LIVERPOOLANYTIME wrote:To whoever asked why wasnt he stopped from going in the station - It was because the person watching the house went for a p.iss and was unable to get a picture of him!!!

Also I stated on the day it happened - if they knew he was a terrorist, why let him get on a bus (which we all now due to 7/7 was a target of choice) and then ALSO go in the station, to me this was just TOO suspect, but as I said above, everybody thought i was a crackpot for thinking in such a way!!!

Maybe people will think before slating someones opinion, I knew it was blatantly a mistake from the get go!!! But I am not here to gloat, why should I, there is a dead man more important that needs to be considered!!!!

Ok give urself a pat on the back!! And the cop who was watching the flat did not state he was takin a leak!! In his report he said he was relieving himself!!
Wan-ing maybe???

Can you not read, I said 'I am not here to gloat', but to inform!!
TBH if people dont listen thats THEIR problem, NOT MINE!!!

'Pat on the back', what a joke please, I dont need to pat my own back Barry, there are more important issues at hand here ie; A DEAD MAN!!!

by **stmichael** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:14 pm

LIVERPOOLANYTIME wrote:No, this isnt a joking matter though St.Mick, it really isnt!!!!

who's laughing?

stop acting like some kind of victim because people disagreed with you. everyone is entitled to their opinion.

by **Ciggy** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:14 pm

LIVERPOOLANYTIME wrote:No, this isnt a joking matter though St.Mick, it really isnt!!!! A completly innocent man was MURDERED, and they are trying to cover it up, we were feed misinformation from the get go, and it sickens me, because it happens all the time, but people fail to realise it!!! However, I DO!!!

So where all them people who got killed in the terrorist attacks in London innocent, the country was on a high state of alert, what if he would have had a bomb? just what if it wasnt mistaken identity?
everyone would call the police sh*tbags for not stopping him.

by **76-1115222408** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:16 pm

cisses_gona_get_ya wrote:I find all this really strange cause when I was watching SKY news on that day, witnesses where saying he was legging it and even rolled off someones car whilst the police where chasing him?
Even them interviewed from the train said he was running, and had a big overcoat on in the middle of summer

The word you are looking for Lynds is 'Patsie', do you really believe that those 'who were on the train' or 'in the station' were really there!!!! PLEASE!!! Those that were there have completly contradicted EVERYTHING we were originally told!!

:no

by **Ciggy** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:23 pm

LIVERPOOLANYTIME wrote:
cisses_gona_get_ya wrote:The word you are looking for Lynds is 'Patsie', do you really believe that those 'who were on the train' or 'in the station' were really there!!!! PLEASE!!! Those that were there have completly contradicted EVERYTHING we were originally told!!

Me names not Patsie, anyway they where there they where coming out the station they where all being interviewed I seen it with my own eyes, and I do not believe they where lying why should they?

by **stmichael** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:26 pm

put it this way. i think these orders came from nearer parliament. i can't see how a policeman at such a high level could be so incompetent.

it's horrifying to say this but i fear it may be true.

i feel we should have the army on the streets and i stand by this view.

by **76-1115222408** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:28 pm

stmichael wrote:i feel we should have the army on the streets and i stand by this view.

You see, we have people already talking about having Martial Law...........I dont believe this!!!!!

This is EXACTLY what they want you to think, the propoganda is so obvious, yet people still fall for it!!

Army on the streets, what next??

:veryangry

by **stmichael** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:40 pm

LIVERPOOLANYTIME wrote:
stmichael wrote:i feel we should have the army on the streets and i stand by this view.

You see, we have people already talking about having Martial Law...........I dont believe this!!!!!

This is EXACTLY what they want you to think, the propoganda is so obvious, yet people still fall for it!!

Army on the streets, what next??

the police aren't properly equipped. it may not be their fault but it's a fact. the army have more experience to deal with terrorism and they also have more knowledge and more training to deal with such situations.

by **neilE** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:45 pm

point taken St Mick, but do you think the army would shoot FEWER people?

by **Ciggy** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:46 pm

Look if the terrorist attacks had not taken place a few days before then that man would still be alive now, wouldnt he?
So even though the police shot him it was due to the terrorist attacks end of story.

by **stmichael** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:50 pm

he was shot after he was arrested, end of story. :angry:

by **Woollyback** » Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:02 am

cisses_gona_get_ya wrote:Look if the terrorist attacks had not taken place a few days before then that man would still be alive now, wouldnt he?
So even though the police shot him it was due to the terrorist attacks end of story.

CORRECT. The blood of Jean Charles de Menezes lies solely on the hands of the terrorists. FULL STOP.

by **Ciggy** » Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:06 am

Woollyback wrote:
cisses_gona_get_ya wrote:Look if the terrorist attacks had not taken place a few days before then that man would still be alive now, wouldnt he?
So even though the police shot him it was due to the terrorist attacks end of story.

CORRECT. The blood of Jean Charles de Menezes lies solely on the hands of the terrorists. FULL STOP.

Would there or would there not have been armed police swarming all over Londons tube stations had it not been for the attacks a few days earlier?
No there wouldnt have been and he would have just got on that train like he probably did every day, before that happened. He would still be alive had there not have been attacks, i dont care what anyone says, when these people put the fear of god into people using there name TERROR ist thats what they do is terrorise people and the whole country was in fear at that particular time.

Liverpool FC Forum

This brazilian guy who was shot - What a joke

Who is online