Lee J wrote:Freedom of speech?
1. Post Liverpool FC topics and discussions in the Liverpool FC Discussion section.
2. Post general ramblings and stuff not really footie related in General chat.
easy as that.
Maybe we could have a Flaming section where we can go to abuse each other??
babu wrote:Returning to the original topic of this thread.
I was wondering how much the 'view latest post' button at the top of the page helps contribute to the spam.
IMO, its a onestop pathway to posting, no need to navigate and explore the other sections. and therefore a lesser understanding for the proper place for a certain type of post. eg discussing chelski, in the premiership section etc.
Don't get me wrong i love that button, but I only discovered about 2 months after i joined. I hate to think how much i would have posted in the wrong place if i had used that button from the start.
As for the other topic of discussion in this thread. I am new to forums as a whole and therefore have no baseline for judgement. all i can say is that I enjoy this forum very much. I joined not so much to contribute to LFC football discussion, but to learn and expand my knowledge from a source other than newspaper's, TV etc.
Ok that's it.
[The extension has been deactivated and can no longer be displayed.]
peewee wrote:oooooooo it seems the dummy is coming out of the pram from all directions here.
now as i will respond as a mature educated person who enjoys having a laugh. JBG this should never be aired in public no matter what your reasons are. if you have a problem and judge has continued after repeated warnings then you still keep it in private and just ban him.
a public 'outing' of something that may or may not have happened is not the way to deal with something and as a mod you should either understand that or dont be a mod. what you have done today is abused your position and i think you should apologise to judge. even if you are 100% certain that he has caused these indecretions you have no real right to make them public.
i say 'even if' for a reason, thats because there are too many people on here living in cloud cukoo land and wouldnt know the truth if it hit them on the back of a head with a shovel. you also need to be aware that someone can alter pms just as they can alter posts so again i ask you are you 100% certain with what you are saying.
i know people are annoyed with some of the cr@p on here at the moment but like i said in another post 'one mans spam is another mans cavier'. if you think the post is rubbish then dont read it, or are the mods now mindreaders and can decide what is interesting for other readers.
thats my tuppence thrown into the equation, everyone calm down and deal with things in a more proficient manner.
thank you
JBG wrote:Looks like I've incurred the wrath of the General Chat face party.
For a start peewee, I have no problems with you whatsoever, in fact I like you as I think you're funny and erudite and I like reading your posts.
However, you telling me to apologise to Judge for having a public go at him is hypocritical. You have been having a go at Zara on the forums for the past few months. I know what happened but thats between the two of you. Fair enough if you've got a problem with Zara, but how can you ask me to apologise to Judge when you've been washing your own dirty laundry in public?
As for public airing, what have I said about Judge in public? Judge left last December after a serious indiscretion and he asked me not to say anything about it on the public forums. I said to him that I wouldn't, so where have I posted it in public?
I lambasted Judge in public before for making borderline dodgy anti-muslim comments. I have no regrets in doing that.
I've also been told by 2 members that they left this forum because of the anti-gay comments made recently in General Chat.
I stand by my comments about Judge. In my view he either starts contributing to the forum and loses the sleaze or else he should go.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests